Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T19:01:36.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction of floating gardening in the north-eastern wetlands of Bangladesh for nutritional security and sustainable livelihood

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2008

Haseeb Md. Irfanullah ,
Ahana Adrika ,
Abdul Ghani ,
Zakir Ahmed Khan  and
Md. Abdur Rashid
Haseeb Md. Irfanullah*
Affiliation:
The World Conservation Union (IUCN), Bangladesh Country Office, House 11, Road 138, Gulshan 1, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh.
Ahana Adrika
Affiliation:
The World Conservation Union (IUCN), Bangladesh Country Office, House 11, Road 138, Gulshan 1, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh.
Abdul Ghani
Affiliation:
Environment and GIS Unit, SHOUHARDO Program, CARE Bangladesh, Pragati RPR Center, 20-21, Karwan Bazar, Dhaka 1215, Bangladesh.
Zakir Ahmed Khan
Affiliation:
Kishoreganj Regional Office, SHOUHARDO Program, 452 Nilganj Road, Sholakia, Kishoreganj 2300, Bangladesh.
Md. Abdur Rashid
Affiliation:
Environment and GIS Unit, SHOUHARDO Program, CARE Bangladesh, Pragati RPR Center, 20-21, Karwan Bazar, Dhaka 1215, Bangladesh.
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Floating gardening is a form of hydroponics or soil-less culture. It is an age-old practice of crop cultivation in the floodplains of southern Bangladesh, where aquatic plants such as water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) are used to construct floating platforms on which seedlings are raised and vegetables and other crops cultivated in the rainy season. The platform residue is used in the preparation of beds for winter vegetable gardening. Floating gardening was introduced in 2006 on a pilot-scale in the north-east wetlands of the country, as a contribution to food security and as a supplementary income for the marginalized community. The overall experience of floating cultivation in three selected villages was encouraging. Local people became aware of this new farming system and their level of knowledge improved. Communities were mobilized into groups to make floating platforms, and platform residues were later used to establish winter gardens. Cultivation was successful on both types of plot, and vegetables were both consumed by the producers and sold in the market. The input–output analysis revealed floating gardening to be a feasible alternative livelihood option for the wetland dwellers. The method provided targeted landless people with parcels of land in the monsoon, enabling them to grow vegetables. Floating gardening and associated winter gardening appear to have the potential for introduction to other parts of the world where aquatic weed management is a major problem.

Keywords

homestead gardeningfood securitynatural resourcesweed controlwetlands
Type
Preliminary Report
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , June 2008 , pp. 89 - 96
Copyright
© 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 IUCN Bangladesh 2005. Baira: The Floating Gardens for Sustainable Livelihood. IUCN—The World Conservation Union, Bangladesh Country Office, Dhaka, Bangladesh. p. 61.Google Scholar
2 Haq, A.H.M.R., Ashaduzzaman, Md., and Ghosal, T.K. 2002. Soil-less Agriculture in Bangladesh. Grameen Trust, Dhaka, Bangladesh. p. 111.Google Scholar
3 IUCN Bangladesh 2006. Final Report: Floating Gardens (Baira) for Sustainable Livelihood in Selected Haor Areas of Bangladesh. The World Conservation Union (IUCN), Bangladesh Country Office, Dhaka, Bangladesh (unpublished).Google Scholar
4 Ministry of Finance 2007. Bangladesh Economic Review 2006. Available at Website: http://www.mof.gov.bd/economic/Chapter-2_B-2006.pdf (verified 7 February 2007).Google Scholar
5 Howard, G.W. and Matindi, S.W. 2003. Alien Invasive Species in Africas Wetlands: Some Threats and Solutions. IUCN—The World Conservation Union, the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands, and The Global Invasive Species Programme (GISP).Google Scholar
6 Mukhopadhyay, S.K. and Hossain, A. 1990. Management and utilization of water hyacinth vegetation as natural-resource in India for the benefit of agriculture. Indian Journal of Agronomy 35:218–223.Google Scholar
7 Alimi, T. and Akinyemiju, O.A. 1991. Effects of water-hyacinth on water transportation in Nigeria. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 29:109–112.Google Scholar
8 De Groote, H., Ajuonu, O., Attignon, S., Djessou, R., and Neuenschwander, P.Economic impact of biological control of water hyacinth in Southern Benin. Ecological Economics 45:105–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Albright, T.P., Moorhouse, T.G., and McNabb, J. 2004. The rise and fall of water hyacinth in Lake Victoria and the Kagera River Basin, 1989–2001. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 42:73–84.Google Scholar
10 Opande, G.O., Onyango, J.C., and Wagai, S.O. 2004. Lake Victoria: the water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes [Mart.] Solms), its socio-economic effects, control measures and resurgence in the Winam gulf. Limnologica 34:105–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 Williams, A.E., Duthie, H.C., and Hecky, R.E. 2005. Water hyacinth in Lake Victoria: why did it vanish so quickly and will it return? Aquatic Botany 81:300–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12 Hill, M.P. and Cilliers, C.J. 1999. A review of the arthropod natural enemies, and factors that influence their efficacy, in the biological control of water hyacinth, Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms-Laubach (Pontederiaceae), in South Africa. African Entomology 7:103–112.Google Scholar
13 Mbati, G. and Neuenschwander, P. 2005. Biological control of three floating water weeds, Eichhornia crassipes, Pistia stratiotes, and Salvinia molesta in the Republic of Congo. Biocontrol 50:635–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14 Wilson, J.R.U., Rees, M., and Ajuonu, O. 2006. Population regulation of a classical biological control agent: larval density dependence in Neochetina eichhorniae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), a biological control agent of water hyacinth Eichhornia crassipes. Bulletin of Entomological Research 96:145–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15 Ogwang, J.A., and Molo, R. 2004. Threat of water hyacinth resurgence after a successful biological control program. Biocontrol Science and Technology 14:623–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16 Woomer, P.L., Muzira, R., Bwamiki, D., Mutetikka, D., Amoding, A., and Bekunda, M.A. 2000. Biological management of water hyacinth waste in Uganda. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 17:181–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17 Ingole, N.W. and Bhole, A.G. 2002. Utilization of water hyacinth relevant in water treatment and resource recovery with special reference to India. Journal of Water Supply Research and Technology-Aqua 51:283–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18 Sinkala, T., Mwase, E.T., and Mwala, M. 2002. Control of aquatic weeds through pollutant reduction and weed utilization: a weed management approach in the lower Kafue River of Zambia. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 27:983–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19 Gunnarsson, C.C. and Petersen, C.M. 2007. Water hyacinths as a resource in agriculture and energy production: a literature review. Waste Management 27:117–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20 Murugesan, A.G., Vijayalakshmi, G.S., Sukumaran, N., and Mariappan, C. 1995. Utilization of water hyacinth for oyster mushroom cultivation. Bioresource Technology 51:97–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21 Uchida, H. and Ando, K. 1998. Water hyacinth control program through community development approach: a case study in a Bangladesh village. Jarq-Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly 32:181–186.Google Scholar
22 IUCN Bangladesh 2005. Approaches to Sustainable Wetland Resource Management. IUCN—The World Conservation Union, Bangladesh Country Office, Dhaka, Bangladesh. p. 88.Google Scholar