Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T18:54:32.480Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of cover crops and soil amendments on okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) production and soil nematodes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2007

Qingren Wang ,
Yuncong Li ,
Waldemar Klassen  and
Zafar Handoo
Qingren Wang
Affiliation:
Tropical Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Homestead, FL 33031, USA.
Yuncong Li*
Affiliation:
Tropical Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Homestead, FL 33031, USA.
Waldemar Klassen
Affiliation:
Tropical Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Homestead, FL 33031, USA.
Zafar Handoo
Affiliation:
Nematology Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A pot experiment to determine the effects of summer cover crops and soil amendments on okra yields and population densities of various soil nematode taxa was conducted in two consecutive growing seasons in a subtropical region. Two cover crops, sunn hemp (Crotalaria juncea) and sorghum sudangrass (Sorghum bicolor×S. bicolor var. sudanense), were grown and returned to the soil with fallow as a control. As soon as these cover crops were harvested, they were soil-incorporated together with one of several organic amendments. These organic amendments were biosolids, N-Viro soil (a 1:1 mixture of coal ash and biosolids), coal ash, co-compost (a 3:7 mixture of biosolids and yard wastes), and yard waste compost compared with a control (no additional amendment). Other treatments were fumigation with MC-33 (a mixture of 33% of methyl bromide and 67% of chloropicrin) and cover crop removal (harvested and removed cover crops and their residues from the soil). A nematode-susceptible vegetable crop, okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.), was grown under these treatments. Among organic amendments, the application of biosolids produced the highest okra yield and biomass, and greatly suppressed root-knot nematodes, Meloidogyne incognita, in the soil. Between these two cover crops, sunn hemp was superior to sorghum sudangrass in improving okra production and in suppressing root-knot nematodes. The result indicates that growing sunn hemp as a cover crop and applying certain organic amendments can improve okra production and suppress root-knot nematodes, which are very damaging to okra plants. Such combined practices show a significant potential for application in organic farming and sustainable agriculture systems in a tropical or subtropical region.

Keywords

amendmentsbiosolidscompostscoal ashcover cropnematodeokra
Type
Research Article
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , March 2007 , pp. 41 - 53
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Li, Y. 1998. What are mineralization rates of compost in south Florida? Vegetarian 98(8):1.Google Scholar
2 Li, Y., Stoffella, P.J., and Bryan, H.H. 2000. Management of organic amendments in vegetable crop production systems in Florida. Proceedings of Soil and Crop Science Society of Florida 59:17–21.Google Scholar
3 Wang, Q., Klassen, W., Li, Y., Handoo, Z., Olczyk, T., and Codallo, M. 2005. Influence of cover crops in rotation on improving okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) yield and suppressing parasitic nematodes. Proceedings of Florida State Horticulture Society 118:177–183.Google Scholar
4 Cameron, E., How, N., Saggar, S., and Ross, C. 2004. The Cost-Benefits of Applying Biosolids Composts for Vegetable, Fruit, and Maize/Sweetcorn Production Systems in New Zealand. Landcare Research Science Series, No. 27. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln, Canterbury, New Zealand. p. 1–32.Google Scholar
5 Eriksen, G.N., Coale, F.J., and Bollero, G.A. 1999. Soil nitrogen dynamics and maize production in municipal solid waste amended soil. Agronomy Journal 91:1009–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Li, Y., Zhang, M., Stoffella, P.J., He, Z., and Bryan, H.H. 2003. Influence of coal ash/organic waste on distribution of trace metals in soil, plant, and water. In Sajwan, K.S., Alva, A.K., and Keefer, P.F. (eds). Chemistry of Trace Elements in Fly Ash. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York. p. 251–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Stoffella, P.J., Calvert, D.V., Li, Y., and Hubbell, D.H. 1996. Municipal solid waste compost (MSW) influence on citrus leaf nutrition, yield and fruit quality. Proceedings of Interamerican Society of Tropical Horticulture 40:157–160.Google Scholar
8 Roe, N.E., Stoffella, P.J., and Graetz, D.A. 1997. Composts from various municipal feedstocks affect vegetable crops. II. Growth, yields, and fruit quality. Journal of American Society of Horticulture Science 122:433–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Ozores-Hampton, M., Schaffer, B., Bryan, H.H., and Hanlon, E.A. 1994. Nutrient concentrations, growth, and yield of tomato and squash in municipal solid waste amended soil. HortScience 29:785–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10 Goldstein, N. 1997. The state of garbage in America. Biocycle 38:60–67.Google Scholar
11 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1994. Composting of yard trimmings and municipal solid waste. USEPA Report 530R940031. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA. p. 1–20.Google Scholar
12 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1993. Summary of markets for compost. USEPA Report 530SW90073B. National Service Center for Environmental Publications, Cincinnati, OH. p. 1–30.Google Scholar
13 Slivka, D.C., McClure, T.A., Buhr, A., and Albrecht, R.A. 1992. Potential U.S. application for compost. Solid Waste Composting Council, Arlington, VA. p. 1–35.Google Scholar
14 Cortellini, L., Toderi, G., Balsoni, G., and Nassissi, A. 1996. Effects on the content of organic matter, nitrogen, phosphorus and heavy metals in soil and plants after application of compost and sewage sludge. In De Bertoldi, M., Sequi, P., Lemmes, B., and Papi, T. (eds). The Science of Composting. Blackie Academic and Professional, Chapman & Hall, London. p. 457–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15 Maynard, A.A. 1995. Increasing tomato yields with MSW compost. Biocycle 36:104–106.Google Scholar
16 Paino, V., Peillex, P., Montlahuc, O., Cambon, A., and Bianchini, J.P. 1996. Municipal tropical compost: effects on crops and soil properties. Compost Science and Utilization 4:62–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17 Turner, M.S., Clark, G.A., Stanley, C.D., and Smajstrla, A.G. 1994. Physical characteristics of sandy soil amended with municipal solid waste compost. Proceedings of Soil and Crop Science Society of Florida 53:24–26.Google Scholar
18 Serria-Wittling, C., Houot, S., and Barriuso, E. 1996. Modification of soil water retention and biological properties by municipal solid waste compost. Compost Science and Utilization 4:44–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19 Rothwell, D.F. and Hortenstine, C.C. 1969. Composted municipal refuse: Its effects on carbon dioxide, nitrate, fungi, and bacteria in Arredondo fine sand. Agronomy Journal 61:837–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20 Clark, G.A., Stanley, C.D., and Maynard, D.N. 1995. Municipal solid waste compost in irrigated vegetable production. Proceedings of Soil and Crop Science Society of Florida 54:49–53.Google Scholar
21 Duggan, J.C. 1973. Utilization of municipal refuse compost: I. Field-scale compost demonstrations. Compost Science and Utilization 14:24–25.Google Scholar
22 Beloso, M.C., Villar, M.C., Cabaneiro, A., Carballas, N.M., Gonzalez-Prieto, S.J., and Carballas, T. 1993. Carbon and nitrogen mineralization in an acid soil fertilized with composted urban refuses. Bioresource Technology 45:123–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23 Barker, K.R., Hussey, R.S., Krusberg, L.R., Bird, G.W., Dunn, R.A., Ferris, H., Ferris, V.R., Freckman, D.W., Gabriel, C.J., Grewal, P.S., MacGuidwin, A.E., Riddle, D.L., Roberts, P.A., and Schmitt, D.P. 1994. Plant and soil nematodes: societal impact and focus for the future. Journal of Nematology 26:127–137.Google ScholarPubMed
24 Wang, Q., Bryan, H., Klassen, W., Li, Y., Codallo, M., and Abdul-Baki, A. 2002. Improved tomato production with summer cover crops and reduced irrigation rates. Proceedings of Florida State Horticulture Society 115:202–207.Google Scholar
25 Wang, Q., Li, Y., and Klassen, W. 2003. Effects of soil amendments at a heavy loading rate associated with cover crops as green manures on the leaching of nutrients and heavy metals from a calcareous soil. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B 38:865–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26 Barker, K.R. and Koenning, S.R. 1998. Developing sustainable systems for nematode management. Annual Review of Phytopathology 36:165–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27 McSorley, R. 1998. Alternative practices for managing plant-parasitic nematodes. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 13:98–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28 Noe, J.P. 1998. Crop and nematode-management systems. In Barker, K.R., Pederson, G.A., and Windham (, G.L.eds. Plant and Nematode Interactions. American Society of Agriculture, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI. p. 159–171.Google Scholar
29 Wang, Q., Klassen, W., Handoo, Z., Abdul-Baki, A., Bryan, H., and Li, Y. 2003. Influence of summer cover crops on soil nematodes in a tomato field. Proceedings of Soil and Crop Science Society of Florida 62:86–91.Google Scholar
30 Chellemi, D.O., Mitchell, D.J., and Barkdol, A.W. 1992. Effect of composted organic amendments on the incidence of bacterial wilt to tomato. Proceedings of Florida State Horticulture Society 105:364–366.Google Scholar
31 Mannion, C.M., Schaffer, B., Ozores-Hampton, M., Bryan, H.H., and McSorley, R. 1994. Nematode population dynamics in municipal solid waste amended soil during tomato and squash cultivation. Nematropica 24:17–24.Google Scholar
32 Bryan, H.H., Ramo, J., Codallo, M., and Scott, J.W. 1997. Effects of soil fumigation, compost, and non-fumigation on the yield, fruit quality, disease incidence, and other variables of tomato cultivars. Proceedings of Florida State Horticulture Society 110:269–272.Google Scholar
33 Ritzinger, C.H., McSorley, R., and Gallaher, R.N. 1997. Effect of organic amendment placement and inoculum density of Meloidogyne arenaria on okra seedlings. Proceedings of Soil and Crop Science Society of Florida 56:28–31.Google Scholar
34 Stoffella, P.J. and Li, Y. 2001. Organic waste compost utilization in vegetable crop production systems. Proceedings of Interamerican Society of Tropical Horticulture 43:30–32.Google Scholar
35 Cobb, N.A. 1918. Estimating the nema population of the soil. Agriculture Technique Circulation Bulletin, Plant Industry, United States Department of Agriculture 1:48.Google Scholar
36 Hooper, D.J. 1986. Extraction of free-living stages from soil. In Southey, J.F. (ed.). Laboratory Methods for Work with Plant and Soil Nematodes. 6th ed. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London. p. 5–30.Google Scholar
37 Seinhorst, J.W. 1959. A rapid method for the transfer of nematodes from fixative to anhydrous glycerine. Nematologica 4:67–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38 Handoo, Z.A. and Golden, A.M. 1992. A key and diagnostic compendium to the species of genus Pratylenchus Filipjev, 1936 (Lesion nematodes). Journal of Nematology 21:202–218.Google Scholar
39 Mai, W.F., Mullin, P.G., Lyon, H.H., and Loeffler, K. 1996. Plant-Parasitic Nematodes. A Pictorial Key to Genera. 5th ed. Comstock Publishing Associates, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY. p. 276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40 Maqbool, M.A. 1982. Description of Quinisulcius solani n. sp. (Nematode: Tylenchorhynchidae) with a key to the species and data on Scutylenchus koreanus from Pakistan. Journal of Nematology 14:221–225.Google Scholar
41 Robinson, A.F., Inserra, R.N., Caswell-Chen, E.P., Vovlas, N., and Troccoli, A. 1997. Rotylenchulus reniformis: identification, distribution, host-ranges, and crop plant resistance. Nematropica 27:127–180.Google Scholar
42 Sher, S.A. 1966. Revision of the Hoplolaiminae (Nematoda). VI. Helicotylenchus Steiner, 1945. Nematologica 1:56.Google Scholar
43 Taylor, A.L. and Sasser, J.N. 1978. Biology, identification, and control of root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne species). North Carolina State University Graphics, Raleigh, NC.Google Scholar
44 SAS Institute. 1999. SAS. Version 8.1. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
45 Warman, P.R. 1998. Results of the long-term vegetable crop production trials: conventional vs. compost amended soils. In Szmidt, R.A.K. (ed.) Proceedings of International Symposium. Composting and Use of Composted Materials for Horticulture. Acta Horticulturae 469: p 333–341.Google Scholar
46 Logsdon, G. 1993. Beneficial biosolids. Biocycle 34:42–44.Google Scholar
47 Hormann, C.M., Clapp, C.E., Dowdy, R.H., Larson, W.E., Duncomb, D.R., Halbach, T.R., and Polta, R.C. 1994. Effect of lime-cake municipal sewage sludge on corn yield, nutrient uptake, and soil analysis. In Clapp, C.E., Larson, W.E., and Dowdy (, R.H.eds. Sewage Sludge: Land Utilization and the Environment. American Society of Agriculture, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI. p. 173–181.Google Scholar
48 Schreeg, T.M. and Jarrett, D.L. III. 1996. Biosolids cut fertilizer costs by $200 an acre. Biocycle 37:69–71.Google Scholar
49 Zhang, M., Heaney, D., Solberg, E., and Heriquez, B. 2000. The effect of MSW compost on metal uptake and yield of wheat, barley and canola in less productive faring soils of Alberta. Compost Science and Utilization 8:224–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
50 Rich, J.R., Rahi, G.S., Opperman, C.H., and Davis, E.L. 1989. Influence of castor bean (Ricinus communis) lectin (ricin) on mortality of Meloidogyne incognita. Nematropica 19:99–103.Google Scholar
51 McSorley, R., Dickson, D.W., and de Brito, J.A. 1994. Host status of selected tropical rotation crops to four populations of root-knot nematodes. Nematropica 24:45–53.Google Scholar
52 Bridge, J. 1996. Nematode management in sustainable and subsistence agriculture. Annual Review of Phytopathology 34:201–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
53 Kloepper, J.W., Rodriguez-Kabana, R., McInroy, J.A., and Collins, D.J. 1991. Analysis of populations and physiological characterization of microorganisms in rhizospheres of plants with antagonistic properties to phytopathogenic nematodes. Plant and Soil 136:95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54 Lear, B. 1959. Application of castor pomace and cropping of caster beans to soil to reduce nematode populations. Plant Disease Report 43:459–460.Google Scholar
55 Klink, J.W. and Barker, K.R. 1968. Effect of Aphelenchus avenae on the survival and pathogenic activity of root-rotting fungi. Phytopathology 58:228–232.Google Scholar
56 Meyer, G.A. 2000. Interactive effects of oils fertility and herbivory on Brassica nigra. Oikos 22:433–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
57 Altiere, M.A. and Nicholls, C.I. 2003. Soil fertility management and insect pests: harmonizing soil and plant health in agroecosystems. Soil and Tillage Research 72:203–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
58 Javed, N., Khan, H.U., Hussain, Z., and Ashfaq, M. 2002. Effect of temperature, soil pH, agitation intervals and soil types on the spore attachment of Pasteuria penetrans to root-knot nematodes, Meloidogyne javanica. Pakistan Journal of Plant Pathology 1:66–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
59 Wang, K.H., Sipes, B.S. and Schmitt, D.P. 2002. Crotalaria as a cover crop for nematode management: a review. Nematropica 32:35–57.Google Scholar
60 Zasada, I.A. and Tenuta, M. 2004. Chemical-mediated toxicity of N-Viro soil to Heterodera glycines and Meloidogyne incognita. Journal of Nematology 36:297–302.Google ScholarPubMed
61 Zasada, I.A. 2005. Factors affecting the suppression of Heterodera glycines by N-Viro soil. Journal of Nematology 37:220–225.Google ScholarPubMed