Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T13:35:23.093Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improving resource-use-efficiency with no-till and crop diversity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2016

Randy L. Anderson
Randy L. Anderson*
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Brookings South Dakota, South Dakota 57006, USA.
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recently, we conducted a case study that showed a no-till, diverse cropping system increasing corn yields in a semiarid climate compared with a tilled, corn–soybean rotation. Further analysis showed that the no-till system improved resource-use-efficiency of corn; inputs were reduced 42% averaged across five resources. The largest reduction with inputs involved nitrogen fertilizer and fuel. Reduced fertilizer input was attributed to greater soil microbial activity. A surprising trend was that cost of weed management in corn was 45% lower in the no-till system, due to resistant weeds being present only in the tilled, corn–soybean system. Crop diversity in the no-till system suppressed development of weed resistance. Integrating a diversity of crops with no-till can improve efficient use of resources.

Keywords

farming systems designreduced inputssoil microbial communityweed resistance
Type
Commentary
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , April 2017 , pp. 105 - 108
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, R.L. 2008. Diversity and no-till: Keys for pest management in the U.S. Great Plains. Weed Science 56:141–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R.L. 2009. A 2-year small grain interval reduces need for herbicides in no-till soybean. Weed Technology 23:398–403.Google Scholar
Anderson, R.L. 2015. Integrating a complex rotation with no-till improves weed management in organic farming. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Agriculture 35:967–974.Google Scholar
Anderson, R.L. 2016. Increasing corn yield with no-till cropping systems: A case study in South Dakota. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems. doi: 10.1017/S1742170515000435.Google Scholar
Bender, S.F. and van der Heijden, M.G. 2015. Soil biota enhance agricultural sustainability by improving crop yield, nutrient uptake and reducing nitrogen leaching losses. Journal of Applied Ecology 52:228–239.Google Scholar
Cordell, D., Drangert, J., and White, S. 2009. The story of phosphorus: Global food security and food for thought. Global Environmental Change 19:292–305.Google Scholar
Dura, M., Therond, O., Martin, G., Martin-Clouaire, R., Magne, M.A., Justes, E., Journet, E.P., Aubertot, J.N., Savary, S., Bergez, J.E., and Sarthou, J.P. 2015. How to implement biodiversity-based agriculture to enhance ecosystem services: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 35:1259–1281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO. 2016. What is Conservation Agriculture? Food and Agriculture Organization CA. Available at Web site http://www.fao.org/ag/ca/1a.thml (verified 10 December 2015).Google Scholar
Gerwing, J., and Gelderman, R. 2005. Fertilizer recommendation guide. South Dakota State University Extension Bulletin EC750. p. 27.Google Scholar
Gregory, M.M., Shea, K.L., and Bakko, E.B. 2015. Comparing agroecosystems: Effects of cropping and tillage patterns on soil, water, energy use, and productivity. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 20:81–90.Google Scholar
Haney, R.L., Jin, V.L., Johnson, M.V., Haney, E.B., Harmel, R.D., Arnold, J.G., and White, M.J. 2015. Analysis methods for the determination of anthropogenic additions of P to agricultural soils. Open Journal of Soil Science 5:59–68.Google Scholar
Harmel, R.D. and Haney, R.L. 2013. Initial evaluation of the agro-economic effects of determining nitrogen fertilizer rates with a recently-developed soil test methodology. Open Journal of Soil Science 3:91–99.Google Scholar
Heap, I. 2015. The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. Available at Web site http://www.weedscience.org (verified 6 November 2015).Google Scholar
Hobbs, P.R. 2007. Conservation agriculture: What it is and why it is important for future sustainable food production. Journal of Agriculture Science 145:127–137.Google Scholar
Khan, S.A., Mulvaney, R.L., Ellsworth, T.R., and Boast, C.W. 2007. The myth of nitrogen fertilization for soil carbon sequestration. Journal of Environmental Quality 36:1821–1832.Google Scholar
Kirschenmann, F.L. 2007. Potential for a new generation of biodiversity in agroecosystems of the future. Agronomy Journal 99:373–376.Google Scholar
Kohl, L., Oehl, F., and van der Heijden, M. 2014. Agricultural practices indirectly influence plant productivity and ecosystem services through effects on soil biota. Ecological Applications 24:1842–1853.Google Scholar
Liebig, M.A., Tanaka, D.L., and Wienhold, B.J. 2004. Tillage and cropping effects on soil quality indicators in the northern Great Plains. Soil and Tillage Research 78:131–141.Google Scholar
Montgomery, D.R. and Bikle, A. 2015. The Hidden Half of Nature: The Microbial Roots of Life and Health. W.W. Norton and Company, New York. p. 312.Google Scholar
Richardson, A.E., and Simpson, R.J. 2011. Soil microorganisms mediating phosphorus availability. Plant Physiology 156:989–996.Google Scholar
Ryan, M.R., Mortensen, D.A., Bastiaans, L., Teasdale, J.R., Mirsky, S.B., Curran, W.S., Seidel, R., Wilson, D.O., and Hepperly, P.R. 2010. Elucidating the apparent maize tolerance to weed competition in long-term organic managed systems. Weed Research 50:25–36.Google Scholar
Senseman, S.A. and Grey, T.L. 2014. The future of herbicides and genetic technology: Ramifications for environmental stewardship. Weed Science 62:382–384.Google Scholar
Shaner, D.L. 2014. Lessons learned from the history of herbicide resistance. Weed Science 62:427–431.Google Scholar
Struik, P.C., Kuyper, T.W., Brussard, L., and Leeuwis, C. 2014. Deconstructing and unpacking scientific controversies in intensification and sustainability: Why the tensions in concepts and values? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 8:80–88.Google Scholar
Triplett, G.B. Jr and Dick, W.A. 2008. No-tillage crop production: A revolution in agriculture! Agronomy Journal 100(Suppl.): S-153–S-165.Google Scholar
Wezel, A., Casagrande, M., Celette, F., Vian, J., Ferrer, A., and Peigne, J. 2014. Agroecological practices for sustainable agriculture. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 34:1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamoah, C.F., Varvel, G.E., Francis, C.A., and Waltman, W.J. 1998. Weather and management impact on crop yield variability in rotations. Journal of Production Agriculture 11:219–225.Google Scholar