Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:59:46.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exit of youths and feminization of smallholder livestock production–a field study in India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2013

M. Jothilakshmi ,
D. Thirunavukkarasu  and
N. K. Sudeepkumar
M. Jothilakshmi
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary and Animal Husbandry Extension, Veterinary College and Research Institute, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu, India, 637002.
D. Thirunavukkarasu*
Affiliation:
Veterinary University Training and Research Centre, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India, 636001.
N. K. Sudeepkumar
Affiliation:
University Publication Division, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, 600051.
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studies in India from the early to late 1990s found that rural youths and women played a predominant role in livestock farming. Even though many studies differ in the extent and nature of the contribution of youths and women in livestock farming, all acknowledge their roles and contribution. Livestock farming acts as a source of supplementary income to youths and women and provides increased nutritional security. New economic policies of the1990s have brought changes to the livestock farming community. This paper attempts to understand and describe the role of women and youths in livestock farming. The research methodology employed for the present study is ex post facto design, and includes semi-structured open-ended interviews, observation and conversations with key informants. The study has found that a change in the roles of women and the participation of youths in livestock farming has occurred, which could be detrimental to the well-being of rural family farmers.

Keywords

smallholder livestock farmingwithdrawal of youthsglobalization and women
Type
From the Field
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , June 2014 , pp. 146 - 150
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Vishwanathan. 1989. Women in livestock in India. A desk study of FAO regional office for Asia and Pacific, Bangkok, Thailand.Google Scholar
2World Bank. 1991. A World Bank Country Report: Gender and Poverty in India. World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
3Government of India, Planning Commission. Report of the Working Group on Animal Husbandry and Dairying for the Eleventh Five Year Plan (2007–2012). Available at Web site http://planningcommission.nic.in/aboutus/committee/wrkgrp11/wg11_rpanim.pdf (accessed 26 January 2013).Google Scholar
4Sharma, S.D., Tripathy, S., and Gurung, P. 1997. Gender dimensions in biodiversity management: India. Report submitted to FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok, Thailand.Google Scholar
5Rangnekar, S. and Rangnekar, D.V. 1999. Developing traditional family poultry production in tribal belt of western India. Available at Web site http://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/themes/en/infpd/documents/econf_scope/add_paper5.html (accessed 26 January 2013).Google Scholar
6Sheokand, R.S., Singh, N., Sheoran, O.P., and Pannu, R.S. 1999. Farm women and animal husbandry practices in paddy belt of Haryana. Journal of Dairying, Foods and Home Science 18(2):85–91.Google Scholar
7Lal, R.C., Singh, J., Sharma, A., Ogra, M., and Sharma, R. 2002. Women labour employment in goat rearing. A case study of revine area of Mathura district. Journal of Dairying, Foods and Home Sciences 21(2):56–59.Google Scholar
8Vellamayil, C. and Maheswari, R. 1997. Role of women in poultry farming. Journal of Extension Education 8(3):1759–1762.Google Scholar
9Hossain, M.M. and Mishra, S.N. 2002. Studies on involvement of women in agriculture and allied activities in Kalahandi district of Orissa. MANAGE Extension Research Review 3:88–96.Google Scholar
10Someswar, D. and Prabhat, K.P. 2004. Role of women in livestock farming. Kurukshetra 52(9):25–29.Google Scholar
11Raut, K.C. 2004. Estimation of women labour in animal husbandry activities. Journal of the Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics 57 (Special Volume):171–177.Google Scholar
12Devaki, K. 1999. Information Need Perception of Farmwomen. MVSc. thesis, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai.Google Scholar
13Narmatha, N. 2001. Entrepreneurial Behaviour of Farm Women in Livestock Enterprise. PhD thesis, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai.Google Scholar
14Palmurugan, M. 2002. Prospects of Empowering Farm Women in Integrated Farming System. PhD thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore.Google Scholar
15Government of India, Planning Commission, Crop Husbandry, Agricultural Inputs, Demand and Supply Projections and Agricultural Statistics for the Twelfth Five Year Plan (2012–2017). Available at Web site http://planningcommission.nic.in/aboutus/committee/index.php?about=12strindx.htm (accessed 26 January 2013).Google Scholar
16Arjun, S.K. 2009. National Commission on for Enterprise in Unorganized Sector. Government of India, New Delhi.Google Scholar
17World Bank. 2008. A World Bank Report: Agriculture. World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
18Rao, S.V.N., Ramkumar, S., and Waldie, K. 2002. Dairy farming by landless women in Southern states ofIndia. In Morrenhof, J., Ahuja, V., and Tripathy, A. (eds). Papers, Proceedings and Presentations of the International Workshop Livestock Services and the Poor, Bhubaneswar, India. p. 73–86.Google Scholar
19Ramkumar, S., Rao, S.V.N., and Waldie, K, 2004. Dairy cattle rearing by landless rural women in Pondicherry: a path to empowerment. Indian Journal of Gender Studies 11(2):205–222.Google Scholar
20Ravikumar, S., Reddy, K.V.R., and Sudhakar Rao, B. 2007. Farmers' choice for cost recovery of veterinary services in different livestock holding systems—A case study of India. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 19, Article #66. Available at Web site http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd19/5/kuma19066.htm (accessed 27 May 2012).Google Scholar
21Manikandan, S. and Thirunavukkarasu, S. 2010. Tamil Nadu powerloom industry issues and challenges—a critical study. International Research Journal 1(10):74–76.Google Scholar
22Jothilakshmi, M., Thirunavukkarasu, D., and Sudeepkumar, N.K. 2011. Structural changes in livestock service delivery system: a case study of India. Asian Journal of Agricultural Research 5:98–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Mahendra, D. 2011. A note on trends in public investment in India. IGIDR Proceedings/Projects series PP-069-SMD2. Indira Gandhi Institute for Development Research, Mumbai. Available at Web site http://www.igidr.ac.in/newspdf/srijit/PP-069-SMD2.pdf (accessed 26 January 2013).Google Scholar
24Harish, M., Balachandran, G., and Pandit, V.N. 2011. Public investment in Agricultural and GDP growth: Another look at the inter sectoral linkages and policy implications. Centre for Developmental Economics, Department of Economics, Delhi School of Economics. Available at Web site http://www.cdedse.org/pdf/work201.pdf (accessed 26 January 2013).Google Scholar
25Bhaskar, G. 2007. Can Indian Dairy Cooperatives Survive in the New Economic Order?. In WTO public forum ‘How Can the WTO Help Harness Globalization?’ 4–5 October, Geneva. WTO, Geneva. Available at Web site http://www.wto.org/english/forums_e/public_forum2007_e/session11_goswami_e.pdf (accessed 26 January 2013).Google Scholar
26Gura, S. (2008). Industrial livestock production and its impact on smallholders in developing countries. Consultancy Report to the League for Pastoral Peoples and Endogenous Livestock Development, Germany.Google Scholar
27Wright, I.A., Tarawali, S., Blummel, M., Gerard, B., Teufel, N., and Herrero, M. 2012. Integrating crops and livestock in subtropical agricultural systems. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 92(5):1010–1015.Google Scholar