Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T11:16:42.425Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic impact of organic agriculture hotspots in the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2018

I. Julia Marasteanu  and
Edward C. Jaenicke
I. Julia Marasteanu*
Affiliation:
Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA
Edward C. Jaenicke
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University, 201 Old Main, University Park, PA, USA
*
Author for correspondence: I. Julia Marasteanu, E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, we assess whether or not organic agriculture has a positive impact on local economies. We first identify organic agriculture hotspots (clusters of counties with positively correlated high numbers of organic operations) using spatial statistics. Then, we estimate a treatment effects model that classifies a county's membership in an organic hotspot as an endogenous treatment variable. By modeling what a hotspot county's economic indicators would have been had the county not been part of a hotspot, this model captures the effect of being in a hotspot on a county's economic indicators. We perform the same analysis for general agricultural farm hotspots to confirm that the benefits associated with organic production hotspots are, in fact, due to the organic component. Our results show that organic hotspot membership leads to a lower county-level poverty rate and a higher median household income. A similar result is not found when investigating the impact of general agriculture hotspots. On the other hand, our result is robust to alternative hotspot definitions based on type of organic operations to alternative methods of estimating average treatment effects on the treated. These results provide strong motivation for considering hotspots of organic handling operations, which refers to middlemen such as processors, wholesalers and brokers, and hotspots of organic production to be local economic development tools, and may be of interest to policymakers whose objective is to promote rural development. Our results may incentivize policymakers to specifically focus on organic development, rather than the more general development of agriculture, as a means to promote economic growth in rural areas, and may further point them in the direction of not only encouraging the presence of organic operations, but of fostering the development of clusters or hotspots of these operations.

Keywords

Hotspotsorganic agriculturerural/regional developmentspatial autocorrelationtreatment effect
Type
Research Paper
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 34 , Issue 6 , December 2019 , pp. 501 - 522
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anselin, L (1995) Local indicators of spatial association—LISA. Geographical Analysis 27, 93–115.Google Scholar
Anselin, L (1999) Spatial econometrics. Available at http://www.csiss.org/learning_resources/content/papers/baltchap.pdf (Accessed 10 August 2012).Google Scholar
Argilés-Bosch, JM and Brown, ND (2007) A comparison of the economic and environmental performances of conventional and organic farming: evidence from financial statements. IEB Working Paper 2007/08.Google Scholar
Banks, J and Marsden, T (2001) The nature of rural development: the organic potential. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 3, 103–121.Google Scholar
Barkley, D and Henry, M (1997) Rural industrial development: to cluster or not to cluster. Review of Agricultural Economics 19(2), 308–325.10.2307/1349744Google Scholar
Becker, SO and Ichino, A (2002) Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. The Stata Journal 2(4), 358–377.Google Scholar
Brown, JP, Goetz, SJ and Fleming, DA (2012) Multifunctional Agriculture and Farm Viability in the United States. Presented at Agricultural and Applied Economics Association 2012 Annual Meeting, 12–14 August 2012, Seattle, Washington.Google Scholar
Cainelli, G (2008) Spatial agglomeration, technological innovations, and firm productivity: evidence from Italian Business Districts. Growth and Change 39, 414–435.10.1111/j.1468-2257.2008.00432.xGoogle Scholar
Cameron, AC and Trivedi, PK (2005) Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511811241Google Scholar
Chevassus-Lozza, E and Galliano, D (2003) Local spillovers, firm organization and export behaviour: evidence from the French food industry. Regional Studies 37(2), 147–158.Google Scholar
Crowder, DW, Northfield, TD, Strand, MR and Snyder, WE (2010) Organic agriculture promotes evenness and natural pest control. Nature 466, 109–113.Google Scholar
Darnhofer, I (2005) Organic farming and rural development: some evidence from Austria. Sociologia Ruralis 45(4), 308–323.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2005.00307.xGoogle Scholar
Davis, DE and Schluter, GE (2005) Labor-force heterogeneity as a source of agglomeration economies in an empirical analysis of county-level. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 30(3), 480–501.Google Scholar
Delgado, M, Porter, ME and Stern, S (2012) Clusters, Convergence, and Economic Performance. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series. Available at http://www.nber.org/papers/w18250.10.3386/w18250Google Scholar
Deller, SC, Tsai, TH, Marcouiller, DW and English, DB (2001) The role of amenities and quality of life in rural economic growth. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83(2), 352–365.10.1111/0002-9092.00161Google Scholar
Dimitri, C and Lohr, L (2007) The US Consumer Perspective on Organic Foods. Organic Food. New York: Springer, pp. 157–167.Google Scholar
Dimitri, C and Oberholzer, L. (2009) Marketing U.S. organic foods: recent trends from farms to customers. USDA/ERS Economic Information Bulletin No. (EIB-58) 36 pp. Available at http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/eib-economic-information-bulletin/eib58.aspx (Accessed 26 September 2012).Google Scholar
Donald, B and Blay-Palmer, A (2006) The urban creative-food economy: producing food for the urban elite or social inclusion opportunity? Environment and Planning A 38(10), 1901.10.1068/a37262Google Scholar
Duranton, G and Puga, D (2004) Microfoundations of Urban Agglomeration Economies. In Handbook of regional and urban economics (Vol. 4, pp. 2063–2117). Elsevier.Google Scholar
Ellison, G, Glaeser, EL and Kerr, W (2010) What Causes Industry Agglomeration? Evidence from Coagglomeration Patterns. American Economic Review, 100(3), 195–1213.Google Scholar
Feldman, MP and Audretsch, DB (1999) Innovation in cities: science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition. European Economic Review 43(2), 409–429.10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00047-6Google Scholar
Feser, E, Renski, H and Goldstein, H (2008) Clusters and economic development outcomes: an analysis of the link between clustering and industry growth. Economic Development Quarterly 22, 324–344.Google Scholar
Florida, R, Mellander, C and Stolarick, K (2008) Inside the black box of regional development—human capital, the creative class and tolerance. Journal of Economic Geography 8(5), 615–649.10.1093/jeg/lbn023Google Scholar
Gabe, T (2009) Impact of Agglomerations on the Economy. Targeting Regional Economic Development, 84.Google Scholar
Gabe, TM (2004) Industry agglomeration and investment in rural businesses. Review of Agricultural Economics 27(1), 89–103.Google Scholar
GeoDa Center. Available at https://geodacenter.asu.edu/ (Accessed 8 May 2013).Google Scholar
Gibbs, RM and Bernat, GA (1997) Rural industry clusters raise local earnings. Rural Development Perspectives 12(3), 18–25.Google Scholar
Glaeser, EL, Kallal, HD, Scheinkman, JA and Shleifer, A (1992) Growth in cities. The Journal of Political Economy 100(6), Centennial Issue, 1126–1152.10.1086/261856Google Scholar
Goetz, S (1997) State and county-level determinants of food manufacturing establishment growth: 1987–93. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79(3), 838–850.Google Scholar
Goetz, SJ, Han, Y, Findeis, JL and Brasier, KJ (2010) US commuting networks and economic growth: measurement and implications for spatial policy. Growth and Change 41(2), 276–302.10.1111/j.1468-2257.2010.00527.xGoogle Scholar
Graham, DJ and Kim, HY (2008) An empirical analytical framework for agglomeration economies. Annals of Regional Science 42, 267–289.Google Scholar
Greene, C (2013) Growth patterns in the US organic industry. Amber Waves, p. 1D.Google Scholar
Greenstone, M, Hornbeck, R and Moretti, E (2010) Identifying agglomeration spillovers: evidence from winners and losers of large plant openings. Journal of Political Economy 118(3), 536–598.10.1086/653714Google Scholar
Grilli, L and Rampichini, C (2011) Propensity scores for the estimation of average treatment effects in observational studies. Paper presented at the Training Sessions on Causal Inference, Bristol, 28–29 June 2011.Google Scholar
Henderson, V (1997) Externalities and industrial development. Journal of Urban Economics 42(3), 449–470.10.1006/juec.1997.2036Google Scholar
Ilbery, BW (1991) Farm diversification as an adjustment strategy on the urban fringe of the West Midlands. Journal of Rural Studies 7(3), 207–218. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/handle/49205 (accessed 18 September 2012).10.1016/0743-0167(91)90085-7Google Scholar
Jaenicke, EC, Goetz, SJ, Wu, P-C and Dimitri, C (2009) Identifying and measuring the effect of firm clusters among certified organic processors and handlers. Presented at Agricultural and Applied Economics Association 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26–28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Kamath, S, Agrawal, J and Chase, K (2012) Explaining geographic cluster success—the GEMS model. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 71, 184–214. doi: 10.1111/j.1536-7150.2011.00819.x.Google Scholar
Klonsky, K and Tourte, L (1998) Organic agricultural production in the United States: debates and directions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80(5), Proceedings Issue, 1119–1124.Google Scholar
Lesage, JP (1998) Spatial econometrics. Available at http://www.spatial-econometrics.com/html/wbook.pdf (Accessed 10 August 2012).Google Scholar
Leuven, E (2003) University of Oslo. PSTEST. Available at http://fmwww.bc.edu/repec/bocode/p/pstest.adoGoogle Scholar
Leuven, E and Sianesi, B (2003) PSMATCH2: stata module to perform full Mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing. Available at http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s432001.html.Google Scholar
Linden, A (2016) covbal: stata module for generating covariate balance statistics. Available at http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s458188.html.Google Scholar
Lobley, M, Butler, A and Reed, M (2009) The contribution of organic farming to rural development: an exploration of the socio-economic linkages of organic and non-organic farms in England. Land Use Policy 26, 723–735.10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.09.007Google Scholar
Lockeretz, W (1989) Comparative local economic benefits of conventional and alternative cropping systems. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 4, 75–83.Google Scholar
Lyson, TA and Welsh, R (2005) Agricultural industrialization, anticorporate farming laws, and rural community welfare. Environment and Planning A 37(8), 1479–1491.Google Scholar
Lyson, TA, Torres, RJ and Welsh, R (2001) Scale of agricultural production, civic engagement, and community welfare. Social Forces 80(1), 311–327.10.1353/sof.2001.0079Google Scholar
Mäder, P, Fliebbach, A, Dubois, D, Gunst, L, Fried, P and Niggli, U (2002) Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming. Science 296, 1694–1697.Google Scholar
Marasteanu, IJ and Jaenicke, EC (2016) The role of US organic certifiers in organic hotspot formation. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 31(3), 230–245.Google Scholar
Marasteanu, IJ and Jaenicke, EC (2016) Hot spots and spatial autocorrelation in certified organic operations in the United States. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 45(3), 485–521.Google Scholar
Markusen, A, Wassall, GH, DeNatale, D and Cohen, R, et al. (2008) Defining the creative economy: industry and occupational approaches. Economic Development Quarterly 22(1), 24–45.10.1177/0891242407311862Google Scholar
Mishra, AK and Goodwin, BK (1997) Farm income variability and the supply of off-farm labor. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79(3), 880–887.Google Scholar
Mishra, AK, El-Osta, HS and Sandretto, CL (2004) Factors affecting farm enterprise diversification. Agricultural Finance Review 64(2), 151–166.10.1108/00214660480001160Google Scholar
Morrison Paul, CJ and Seigel, DS (1999) Scale economies and industry agglomeration externalities: a dynamic cost function approach. The American Economic Review 89(1), 272–290.10.1257/aer.89.1.272Google Scholar
Naik, G and Nagadevara, V (2010) Spatial clusters in organic farming—a case study of pulses cultivation in Karnataka. IIM Bangalore Research Paper No. 316. Available at SSRN http://ssrn.com/abstract=2124370.10.2139/ssrn.2124370Google Scholar
National Organic Program (2012) Available at http://apps.ams.usda.gov/nop/ (Accessed 29 September 2012).Google Scholar
National Organic Program (2016) Available at https://www.ams.usda.gov/about-ams/programs-offices/national-organic-program (Accessed 12 April 2016).Google Scholar
Pimentel, D, Hepperly, P, Hanson, J, Douds, D and Seidel, R, et al. (2005) Environmental, energetic, and economic comparisons of organic and conventional farming systems. BioScience 55(7), 573–582.10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0573:EEAECO]2.0.CO;2Google Scholar
Politico. 2012. Available at http://www.politico.com/2000-election/results/map/#/President/2000/ (Accessed January 2012).Google Scholar
Pugliese, P (2001) Organic farming and sustainable rural development: a multifaceted and promising convergence. Sociologia Ruralis 41, 112–130.10.1111/1467-9523.00172Google Scholar
Rocha, HO and Sternberg, R (2005) Entrepreneurship: the role of clusters theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence from Germany. Small Business Economics 24, 267–292.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, PR and Rubin, DB (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1), 41–55.Google Scholar
Schmidtner, E, Lippert, C, Engler, B, Haring, AM, Aurbacher, J and Dabbert, S (2012) Spatial distribution of organic farming in Germany: does neighbourhood matter? European Review of Agricultural Economics 39(4), 1–23.10.1093/erae/jbr047Google Scholar
Seufert, V, Ramankutty, N and Foley, JA (2012) Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture. Nature 485, 229–234.Google Scholar
Terluin, IJ (2003) Differences in economic development in rural regions of advanced countries: an overview and critical analysis of theories. Journal of Rural Studies 19(3), 327–344.10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00071-2Google Scholar
United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. Available at http://www.bls.gov/ (Accessed 21 October 2012).Google Scholar
United States Census. Available at http://www.census.gov/ (Accessed 21 October 2012).Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture's ARMS data. Available at https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/arms-farm-financial-and-crop-production-practices/arms-data/ (Accessed 21 October 2012).Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture's Census of Agriculture. 2008. Available at http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2007/Online_Highlights/Organics/index.php (Accessed 21 October 2012).Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture's Economic Research Service. 2003. Urban Influence Codes. Available at https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/urban-influence-codes.aspx (Accessed 29 September 2012).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1980. Report and recommendations on organic farming. Prepared by USDA Study Team on Organic Farming. Available at http://pubs.nal.usda.gov/report-and-recommendations-organic-farming-usda-1980.Google Scholar
Van der Ploeg, JD, Renting, H, Brunori, G, Knickel, K, Mannion, J, Marsden, T, De Roest, K, Sevilla-Guzmán, E and Ventura, F (2000) Rural development: from practices and policies towards theory. Sociologia Ruralis 40(4), 391–408.Google Scholar