Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T11:14:35.567Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A cultural system to reduce weed interference in organic soybean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2014

Randy L. Anderson
Randy L. Anderson*
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Brookings, South Dakota 57006, USA
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Organic producers are seeking alternative tactics for weed control, so that they can reduce their need for tillage. In this study, we examined cultural strategies for controlling weeds during the transition from a cool-season crop to soybean. The study was arranged as a two-way factorial, with factors being choice of cool-season crop and tillage treatments. The cool-season crops were either spring wheat harvested for grain or an oat–pea mixture harvested for forage. Five tillage treatments, ranging from intensive tillage to no-till, were established following each cool-season crop. Two tillage treatments included the cover crops, oat plus oilseed radish. Soybean was planted the following growing season. Each soybean plot was split into two subplots: weed-free and weed-infested. A cultural system comprising oat/pea as a preceding crop with no-till and cover crops reduced weed biomass in soybean 63% compared to intensive tillage. Reduced weed biomass resulted because of delayed weed emergence and lower weed community density. Consequently, soybean yielded 14% more in this treatment than with the intensive tillage treatment when weeds were present. Weed community composition also differed between the two systems; horseweed and field dandelion were prominent in no-till, whereas common lambsquarters, redroot pigweed and buffalobur were prevalent in the tillage control. Other treatments did not control weeds better than intensive tillage. A cultural system approach may minimize the need for tillage during the interval between cool-season crops and soybean.

Keywords

cover cropscultural tacticsrotation designweed biomass
Type
Research Papers
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , August 2015 , pp. 392 - 398
Creative Commons
This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States.
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Sooby, J., Landeck, J., and Lipson, M. 2007. National Organic Research Agenda. Organic Farming Research Foundation, Santa Cruz, CA. Available at Web site ofrf.org (accessed April 2, 2013).Google Scholar
2 Triplett, G.B. Jr and Dick, W.A. 2008. No-tillage crop production: A revolution in agriculture! Agronomy Journal 100(Supplement):S-153–S-165.Google Scholar
3 Hobbs, P.R. 2007. Conservation agriculture: What is it and why is it important for future sustainable food production? Journal of Agricultural Science 145:127–137.Google Scholar
4 Peigne, J., Ball, B.C., Roger-Estrade, J., and David, C. 2007. Is conservation tillage suitable for organic farming? A review. Soil Use and Management 23:129–144.Google Scholar
5 Maeder, P. and Berner, A. 2011. Development of reduced tillage systems in organic farming in Europe. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 27:7–11.Google Scholar
6 Brainard, D.C., Haramoto, E., Williams, M.M. II, and Mirsky, S. 2013. Towards a no-till no-spray future? Introduction to a symposium on nonchemical weed management for reduced-tillage cropping systems. Weed Technology 27:190–192.Google Scholar
7 Gruber, S. and Claupein, W. 2009. Effect of tillage intensity on weed infestation in organic farming. Soil & Tillage Research 105:104–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 Carr, P.M., Maeder, P., Creamer, N.G., and Beeby, J.S. 2011. Editorial: Overview and comparison of conservation tillage practices and organic farming in Europe and North America. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 27:2–6.Google Scholar
9 Anderson, R.L. 2005. A multi-tactic approach to manage weed population dynamics in crop rotations. Agronomy Journal 97:1579–1583.Google Scholar
10 Anderson, R.L. 2010. A rotation design to reduce weed density in organic farming. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 25:189–195.Google Scholar
11 Anderson, R.L. 2009. A 2-year small grain interval reduces need for herbicides in no-till soybean. Weed Technology 23:398–403.Google Scholar
12 Froud-Williams, R.J. 1988. Changes in weed flora with different tillage and agronomic management systems. In Altieri, M.A. and Liebman, M. (eds). Weed Management in Agroecosystems: Ecological Approaches. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. p. 213–236.Google Scholar
13 Mohler, C.L. 2006. Weed life histories: Identifying vulnerabilities. In Liebman, M., Mohler, C.L., and Staver, C.P. (eds). Ecological Management of Agricultural Weeds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. p. 40–98.Google Scholar
14 Wicks, G.S., Crutchfield, D.A., and Burnside, O.C. 1994. Influence of wheat (Triticum aestivum) straw mulch and metolachlor on corn (Zea mays) growth and yield. Weed Science 42:141–147.Google Scholar
15 Teasdale, J.R., Brandsaeter, L.O., Calegari, A., and Skora Neto, F. 2007. Cover crops and weed management. In Upadhyaya, M.K. and Blackshaw, R.E. (eds). Non-Chemical Weed Management. CABI Publishing Company, Cambridge, MA. p. 49–64.Google Scholar
16 Peachey, R.E., Williams, R.D., and Mallory-Smith, C. 2004. Effect of no-till or conventional planting and cover crop residues on weed emergence in vegetable row crops. Weed Technology 18:1023–1030.Google Scholar
17 Lawley, Y.E., Weil, R.R., and Teasdale, J.R. 2011. Forage radish cover crop suppresses winter annual weeds in fall and before corn planting. Agronomy Journal 103:137–144.Google Scholar
18 Westerman, P.R., Liebman, M., Menalled, F.D., Heggenstaller, A.H., Hartzler, R.G., and Dixon, P.M. 2005. Are many little hammers effective? Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) population dynamics in two- and four-year crop rotation systems. Weed Science 53:382–392.Google Scholar
19 Stevenson, F.C. and van Kessel, C. 1996. The nitrogen and non-nitrogen rotation benefits of pea to succeeding crops. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 76:735–745.Google Scholar
20 Przednowek, D.W., Entz, M.H., Irvine, B., Flaten, D.N., and Thiessen-Martens, J.R. 2004. Rotational yield and apparent N benefits of grain legumes in southern Manitoba. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 84:1093–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21 Mohr, R.M., Entz, M.H., Janzen, H.H., and Bullied, W.J. 1999. Plant-available nitrogen supply as affected by method and timing of alfalfa termination. Agronomy Journal 91:622–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22 Mohler, C.L. 1993. A model of the effects of tillage on emergence of weed seedlings. Ecological Applications 3:53–73.Google Scholar
23 Mohler, C.L. and Teasdale, J.R. 1993. Response of weed emergence to rate of Vicia villosa Roth and Secale cereale L. residue. Weed Research 33:487–499.Google Scholar
24 Kruidhoff, H.M., Bastiaans, L., and Kropff, M.J. 2008. Ecological weed management by cover cropping: Effects on weed growth in autumn and weed establishment in spring. Weed Research 48:492–502.Google Scholar
25 Teasdale, J.R. and Mohler, C.L. 1993. Light transmittance, soil temperature, and soil moisture under residue of hairy vetch and rye. Agronomy Journal 85:673–680.Google Scholar
26 DeFelice, M.S., Carter, P.R., and Michell, S.B. 2006. Influence of tillage on corn and soybean yield in the United States and Canada. Crop Management doi:10.1094/CM-2006-0626-01-RS.Google Scholar
27 Carr, P.M., Anderson, R.L., Lawley, Y.E., and Miller, P.R. 2011. Organic zero-till in the northern US great plains region: Opportunities and obstacles. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 27:12–20.Google Scholar
28 Weaver, S.E. 2001. The biology of Canadian weeds. 115. Conyza canadensis . Canadian Journal of Plant Science 81:867–875.Google Scholar
29 Nandula, V.K., Eubank, T.W., Poston, D.H., Koger, C.H., and Reddy, K.N. 2006. Factors affecting germination of horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Science 54:898–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30 Donald, W.W. 2006. Mowing for weed management. In Singh, H.P., Batish, D.R., and Kohli, R.K. (eds). Handbook of Sustainable Weed Management. Food Products Press, New York. p. 329–372.Google Scholar
31 Forcella, F. 2012. Air-propelled abrasive grit for postemergence weed control in field corn. Weed Technology 26:161–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32 Melander, B., Rasmussen, I.A., and Barberi, P. 2005. Integrating physical and cultural methods of weed control—examples from European research. Weed Science 53:369–381.Google Scholar
33 Harder, D.B., Sprague, C.L., and Renner, K.A. 2007. Effect of soybean row width and population on weeds, crop yield, and economic return. Weed Technology 21:744–752.Google Scholar
34 Kornecki, T.S., Price, A.J., Raper, R.L., and Arriaga, F.J. 2009. New roller crimper concepts for mechanical termination of cover crops in conservation agriculture. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 24:165–173.Google Scholar
35 Mischler, R.A., Curran, W.S., Duiker, S.W., and Hyde, J.A. 2010. Use of a rolled-rye cover crop for weed suppression in no-till soybeans. Weed Technology 24:253–261.Google Scholar
36 Teasdale, J.R., Mangum, R.W., Radhakrishnan, J., and Cavigelli, M.A. 2004. Weed seedbank dynamics in three organic farming crop rotations. Agronomy Journal 96:1429–1435.Google Scholar