Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:32:03.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conversion of rural abattoir wastes to an organic fertilizer and its application in the field cultivation of tomato in India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2015

Malancha Roy ,
Rimi Das ,
Anupam Debsarcar ,
Pradip Kumar Sen  and
Joydeep Mukherjee
Malancha Roy
Affiliation:
School of Environmental Studies, Jadavpur University, Kolkata 700 032, India
Rimi Das
Affiliation:
School of Environmental Studies, Jadavpur University, Kolkata 700 032, India
Anupam Debsarcar
Affiliation:
Environmental Engineering Division, Department of Civil Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata 700 032, India
Pradip Kumar Sen
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Jadavpur University, Kolkata 700 032, India
Joydeep Mukherjee*
Affiliation:
School of Environmental Studies, Jadavpur University, Kolkata 700 032, India
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sophisticated capital intensive waste-recycling technologies are unviable in small rural abattoirs in India due to low volume of wastes (principally blood and rumen digesta) generated and lack of infrastructural facilities. We report recycling of slaughterhouse wastes as an organic fertilizer, ‘bovine-blood-rumen-digesta-mixture’ (BBRDM). Bovine blood and rumen digesta were mixed in 3:1 ratio in a metallic container, boiled and stirred continuously till the mixture was largely free of water. The mass was sun-dried for 3 days to obtain the final product. BBRDM was applied for field cultivation of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L., local variety ‘Patharkuchi’) in West Bengal state (India) during 2012–13 and 2013–14. We compared tomato yields obtained with BBRDM (N:P2O5:K2O 30.36:1:5.75) and conventional inorganic fertilizers [diammonium phosphate (DAP), N:P2O5:K2O 18:46:0 + potash, N:P2O5:K2O 0:0:44]. BBRDM was applied at a higher rate compared with DAP + potash to meet the farmers’ desire for enhanced yields. 75 kg ha−1 was applied at the 2nd week while 150 kg ha−1 was applied at the 8th week after transplantation. Yields (total fruit weight) obtained from BBRDM-treated plants were higher in comparison with DAP + potash-fertilized plants by 46–48% as the former supplied 2.5 times more nitrogen (N) than the latter. The partial factor productivity of DAP + potash was 73–76% higher than BBRDM. Conversely, as BBRDM was produced through local entrepreneurship from slaughterhouse wastes, the cost of this organic product would be expected to be much lower than the commercial inorganic fertilizer. Furthermore, application of BBRDM negates the environmental cost of treating slaughterhouse effluent. Considering the same cost of applying 225 kg fertilizer ha−1, higher yield with BBRDM should result in greater potential revenue for the farmer compared with yields with DAP + potash. The C/N ratio of BBRDM is 4.8, having relatively high N content. Accordingly, rapid release of plant-available N was observed in BBRDM-fertilized soils. The temporal increase in soil NH4+may be attributed to lack of soil N immobilization. Local farmers are willing to accept the new fertilizer as a substitute for currently used chemical fertilizers.

Keywords

wasteslaughterhouseorganic fertilizertomatorecycling
Type
Research Papers
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , August 2016 , pp. 350 - 360
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adeyemi, N.I.G. and Adeyemo, O.K. 2007. Waste management practices at the Bodija abattoir. International Journal of Environmental Studies 64:71–82. doi: 10.1080/00207230601124989.Google Scholar
Agele, S.O., Iremiren, G.O., and Ojeniyi, S.O. 1999. Effects of plant density and mulching on the performance of late-season tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) in southern Nigeria (Article). Journal of Agricultural Science 133:397–402. doi: 10.1017/S0021859699006942.Google Scholar
Alburquerque, J.A., de la Fuente, C., and Bernal, M.P. 2012. Chemical properties of anaerobic digestates affecting C and N dynamics in amended soils. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 160:15–22. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2011.03.007.Google Scholar
Angst, T.E., Six, J., Reay, D.S., and Sohi, S.P. 2014. Impact of pine chip biochar on trace greenhouse gas emissions and soil nutrient dynamics in an annual ryegrass system in California. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 191:17–26. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2014.03.009.Google Scholar
APEDA AGRIXCHANGE. Indian Production of Tomato (HSCODE-07020000) National Horticulture Board (NHB) Year: 2012–13. APEDA AGRIXCHANGE. Available at Web site http://agriexchange.apeda.gov.in/India%20Production/India_Productions.aspx?hscode=07020000 (verified 18 March 2015).Google Scholar
ASTM International, Active standard ASTM D2216. Standard test methods for laboratory determination of water (moisture) content of soil and rock by mass. ASTM International, Active standard ASTM D2216. Available at Web site http://www.astm.org/Standards/D2216.htm (verified 18 March 2015).Google Scholar
ASTM International, Active standard ASTM D4318. Standard test methods for liquid limit, plastic limit and plasticity index of soils. ASTM International, Active standard ASTM D4318. Available at Web site http://www.astm.org/Standards/D4318.htm (verified 16 March 2015).Google Scholar
ASTM International, Active standard ASTM D7263. Standard test methods for laboratory determination of density (unit weight) of soil specimens. ASTM International, Active standard ASTM D7263. Available at Web site http://www.astm.org/Standards/D7263.htm (verified 16 March 2015).Google Scholar
Awodun, M.A. 2008. Effect of nitrogen released from rumen digesta and cowdung on soil and leaf nutrient content of Gboma (Solanum macrocarpon L.). Journal of Applied Biosciences 7:202–206. ISSN 1997–5902: http://www.biosciences.elewa.org (verified 18 March 2015).Google Scholar
Badgley, C., Moghtader, J., Quintero, E., Zakem, E., Chappell, M.J., Avilés-Vázquez, K., Samulon, A., and Perfecto, I. 2007. Organic agriculture and the global food supply. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 22:86–108. doi: 10.1017/S1742170507001640.Google Scholar
Balemi, T. 2008. Response of tomato cultivars differing in growth habit to nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers and spacing on vertisol in Ethiopia. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica 91:103–119. doi: 10.2478/v10014-008-0011-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bechini, L. and Marino, P. 2009. Short-term nitrogen fertilizing value of liquid dairy manures is mainly due to ammonium. Soil Science Society of America Journal 73:2159–2169. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2008.0217.Google Scholar
Bulluck, L.R. III and Ristaino, J.B. 2002. Effect of synthetic and organic soil fertility amendments on southern blight, soil microbial communities, and yield of processing tomatoes. Phytopathology 92:181–189. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2002.92.2.181.Google Scholar
Bustamante, M.A., Pérez-Murcia, M.D., Paredes, C., Moral, R., Pérez-Espinosa, A., and Moreno-Caselles, J. 2007. Short-term carbon and nitrogen mineralisation in soil amended with winery and distillery organic wastes. Bioresource Technology 98:3269–3277. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.07.013.Google Scholar
Campanelli, G. and Canali, S. 2012. Crop production and environmental effects in conventional and organic vegetable farming systems: The case of a long-term experiment in Mediterranean conditions (Central Italy). Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 36:599–619. doi: 10.1080/10440046.2011.646351.Google Scholar
Chantigny, M.H., Rochette, P., and Angers, D.A. 2001. Short-term C and N dynamics in a soil amended with pig slurry and barley straw: A field experiment. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 81:131–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colla, G., Mitchell, J.P., Poudel, D.D., and Temple, S.R. 2002. Changes of tomato yield and fruit elemental composition in conventional low input and organic systems. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 20:53–67. doi: 10.1300/J064v20n02_07.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng, F., Wang, L., Ren, W.-J., and Mei, X.-F. 2014. Enhancing nitrogen utilization and soil nitrogen balance in paddy fields by optimizing nitrogen management and using polyaspartic acid urea. Field Crops Research 169:30–38. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.08.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Sustainable Natural Resources. Soil Survey Standard Test Method Particle Size Analysis. Department of Sustainable Natural Resources. Available at Web site http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/resources/soils/testmethods/psa.pdf (verified 18 March 2015).Google Scholar
Ekunseitan, D.A., Balogun, O.O., Sogunle, O.M., Yusuf, A.O., Ayoola, A.A., Ebgeyale, L.T., Adeyemi, O.A., Allison, I.B., and Iyanda, A.I. 2013. Health status of birds fed diets containing three differently processed discarded vegetable-bovine blood-rumen content mixtures. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 16:325–331. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2013.325.331.Google Scholar
Envis Newsletter. 2009. ENVIS/PPCC/NL-14. Vol- 4. No. 4. Available at Web site http://dste.puducherry.gov.in/envisnew/fourteenth-NL-JAN-MARCH-2009.pdf (verified 18 March 2015).Google Scholar
FAOSTAT. Food and Agricultural Organizations of United Nations. Available at Web site http://faostat.fao.org/site/339/default.aspx (verified 16 March 2015).Google Scholar
Food and Agricultural Organizations of United Nations. 2012. Current World Fertilizer Trends and Outlook to 2016. Food and Agricultural Organizations of United Nations, Rome. Available at Web site ftp://ftp.fao.org/ag/agp/docs/cwfto16.pdf (verified 16 March 2015).Google Scholar
Galvez, A., Sinicco, T., Cayuela, M.L., Mingorance, M.D., Fornasier, F., and Mondini, C. 2012. Short term effects of bioenergy by-products on soil C and N dynamics, nutrient availability and biochemical properties. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 160:3–14. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2011.06.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentile, R., Vanlauwe, B., Chivenge, P., and Six, J. 2011. Trade-offs between the short- and long-term effects of residue quality on soil C and N dynamics. Plant and Soil 338:159–169. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2011.06.015.Google Scholar
Gupta, A. and Shukla, V. 1977. Response of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum mill.) to plant spacing, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilization. Indian Journal of Horticulture 34:270–276.Google Scholar
Hartz, T.K. and Johnstone, P.R. 2006. Nitrogen availability from high-nitrogen containing organic fertilizers. HortTechnology 16:39–42. Available at Web site http://www.ucanr.org/sites/nm/files/76755.pdf (verified 16 March 2015).Google Scholar
Hartz, T.K., Smith, R., and Gaskell, M. 2010. Nitrogen availability from liquid organic fertilizers. HortTechnology 20:169–172.Google Scholar
Hinman, T., Baier, A., and Riesselman, L. 2012. Organic tomato production. National Sustainable Agriculture Information Service. A project of the National Center for Appropriate Technology. 1-800-346-9140. Available at Web site http://www.attra.ncat.org (verified 16 March 2015).Google Scholar
Hiranandani, A., McCall, R.M., and Shaheen, S. 2010. India's Holy Cash Cow. New Internationalist Issue 434. Available at Web site http://newint.org/columns/currents/2010/07/01/india-leather-cows/ (verified 16 March 2015).Google Scholar
Huang, B., Sun, W., Zhao, Y., Zhu, J., Yang, R., Zou, Z., Ding, F., and Su, J. 2007. Temporal and spatial variability of soil organic matter and total nitrogen in an agricultural ecosystem as affected by farming practices. Geoderma 139:336–345. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.02.012.Google Scholar
Indocert. Available at Web site http://www.indocert.org/index.php/en/ (verified 16 March 2015).Google Scholar
Javaria, S. and Khan, M.Q. 2011. Impact of integrated nutrient management on tomato yield quality and soil environment. Journal of Plant Nutrition 34:140–149. doi: 10.1080/01904167.2011.531605.Google Scholar
Killi, D. and Kavdir, Y. 2013. Effects of olive solid waste and olive solid waste compost application on soil properties and growth of Solanum lycopersicum . International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation 82:157–165. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.03.004.Google Scholar
Law-Ogbomo, K.E. and Egharevba, R.K.A. 2009. Effects of planting density and NPK fertilizer application on yield and yield components of tomato (Lycospersicon esculentum mill) in forest location. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences 5:152–158. Available at Web site http://www.idosi.org/wjas/wjas5(2)/4.pdf (verified 18 March 2015).Google Scholar
Livestock and Poultry: World Markets and Trade. United States Department of Agriculture Foreign Agricultural Service Approved by the World Agricultural Outlook Board/USDA November 2013. Available at Web site http://www.thepigsite.com/reports/?id=985 (verified 16 March 2015).Google Scholar
Manual on Municipal Solid Waste Management. 2000. Available at Web site http://www.indiawaterportal.org/sites/indiawaterportal.org/files/Manual%20on%20municipal%20solid%20waste%20management_%20MoUD_GOI_2000.pdf (verified 18 March 2015).Google Scholar
Marinari, S., Lagomarsino, A., Moscatelli, M.C., Di Tizio, A., and Campiglia, E. 2010. Soil carbon and nitrogen mineralization kinetics in organic and conventional three-year cropping systems. Soil and Tillage Research 109:161–168. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2010.06.002.Google Scholar
Martín-Olmedo, P. and Rees, R.M. 1999. Short-term N availability in response to dissolved-organic-carbon from poultry manure, alone or in combination with cellulose. Biology and Fertility of Soils 29:386–393.Google Scholar
Meat Sector – DSIR. Available at Web site http://www.dsir.gov.in/reports/ittp_tedo/agro/AF_Animals_Meat_Intro.pdf (verified 18 March 2015).Google Scholar
Mittal, G.S. 2006. Treatment of wastewater from abattoirs before land application – a review. Bioresource Technology 97:1119–1135. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2004.11.021.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murthy, V.N.S. 1992. A Textbook of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering - Third revised and enlarged edition. Kripa Technical Consultants, Bangalore.Google Scholar
Nyberg, G., Ekblad, A., Buresh, R., and Högberg, P. 2002. Short-term patterns of carbon and nitrogen mineralization in a fallow field amended with green manures from agroforestry trees. Biology and Fertility of Soils 36:18–25. doi: 10.1007/s00374-002-0484-2.Google Scholar
Pagans, E., Barrena, R., Font, X., and Sánchez, A. 2006. Ammonia emissions from the composting of different organic wastes. Dependency on process temperature. Chemosphere 62:1534–1542. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.06.044.Google Scholar
Peigné, J., Casagrande, M., Payet, V., David, C., Sans, F.X., Blanco-Moreno, J.M., Cooper, J., Gascoyne, K., Antichi, D., Bàrberi, P., Bigongiali, F., Surböck, A., Kranzler, A., Beeckman, A., Willekens, K., Luik, A., Darja, M., Grosse, M., Heß, J., Clerc, M., Dierauer, H., and Mäder, P. 2014. How organic farmers practice conservation agriculture in Europe. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 1–14. doi: 10.1017/S1742170514000477.Google Scholar
Petróczki, F. 2004. Effect of sewage sludge and slaughterhouse waste compost on plant growth. Acta Agronomica Hungarica 52:253–261. doi: 10.1556/AAgr.52.2004.3.7.Google Scholar
Radin, A.M. and Warman, P.R. 2011. Effect of municipal solid waste compost and compost tea as fertility amendments on growth and tissue element concentration in container-grown tomato. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 42:1349–1362. doi: 10.1080/00103624.2011.571742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragályi, P. and Kádár, I. 2012. Effect of organic fertilizers made from slaughterhouse wastes on yield of crops. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 58(sup 1):S122–S126. doi: 10.1080/03650340.2012.695863.Google Scholar
Riahi, A., Hdider, C., Sanaa, M., Tarchoun, N., Ben Kheder, M., and Guezal, I. 2009. The influence of different organic fertilizers on yield and physico-chemical properties of organically grown tomato. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 33:658–673. doi: 10.1080/10440040903073800.Google Scholar
Rinaldi, M., Convertini, G., and Elia, A. 2007. Organic and mineral nitrogen fertilization for processing tomato in southern Italy. Acta Horticulturae 758:241–248.Google Scholar
Roy, M., Karmakar, S., Debsarcar, A., Sen, P.K., and Mukherjee, J. 2013. Application of rural slaughterhouse waste as an organic fertilizer for pot cultivation of solanaceous vegetables in India. International Journal of Recycling Organic Waste in Agriculture 2:1–11. doi: 10.1186/2251-7715-2-6.Google Scholar
Sapkota, A.R., Lefferts, L.Y., McKenzie, S., and Walker, P. 2007. What do we feed to food-production animals? A review of animal feed ingredients and their potential impacts on human health. Environmental Health Perspectives 115:663–670.Google Scholar
Satyanarayan, S., Ramakant, , and Vanerkar, A.P. 2005. Conventional approach for abattoir wastewater treatment. Environmental Technology 26:441–447. doi: 10.1080/09593332608618554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, D., Chhonkar, P.K., and Pandey, R.N. 1999. Soil, Plant and Water Analysis - A Method Manual. IARI, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Slaughter House Waste and Dead Animals. Available at Web site http://localbodies.up.nic.in/swm/chap5.pdf (verified 16 March 2015).Google Scholar
Smil, V. 2011. Nitrogen cycle and world food production. World Agriculture 2:9–1. Available at Web site http://www.vaclavsmil.com/wp-content/uploads/docs/smil-article-worldagriculture.pdf (verified 18 March 2015).Google Scholar
Sortino, O., Dipasquale, M., Montoneri, E., Tomasso, L., Perrone, D.G., Vindrola, D., Negre, M., and Piccone, G. 2012. Refuse derived soluble bio-organics enhancing tomato plant growth and productivity. Waste Management 32:1792–1801. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.04.020.Google Scholar
Subbiah, B.V. and Asija, G.L. 1956. A rapid procedure for determination of available nitrogen in soils. Current Science 25:259–260.Google Scholar
Taiwo, L.B., Adediran, J.A., and Sonubi, O.A. 2007. Yield and quality of tomato grown with organic and synthetic fertilizers. International Journal of Vegetable Science 13:5–19. doi: 10.1300/J512v13n02_02.Google Scholar
Thampi, C.J. and Mukhopadhyay, A.K. 1975. Studies on the structural stability of some soils of West Bengal. Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy - Part B: Biological Sciences 41:47–53.Google Scholar
Torrent, J. and Barron, V. 1993. Laboratory measurement of soil color: Theory and Practice. Available at Web site http://www.uco.es/organiza/departamentos/decraf/pdf-edaf/Soil%20Colour1993.pdf (verified 16 March 2015).Google Scholar
Tu, C., Ristaino, J.B., and Hu, S. 2006. Soil microbial biomass and activity in organic tomato farming systems: Effects of organic inputs and straw mulching. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 38:247–255. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.05.002.Google Scholar
Villar, M.C., Petrikova, V., Díaz-Raviña, M., and Carballas, T. 2004. Recycling of organic wastes in burnt soils: Combined application of poultry manure and plant cultivation. Waste Management 24:365–370. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2003.09.004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vončina, A. and Mihelič, R. 2013. Sheep wool and leather waste as fertilizers in organic production of asparagus (Asparagus officinalis L.). Acta Agriculturae Slovenica 101:191–200. doi: 10.2478/acas-2013-0015.Google Scholar
Walworth, J.L. 2010–2011. Soil Sampling and Analysis AZ1412. Arizona Cooperative Extension. College of Agriculture and Life Sciences. The University of Arizona. Available at Web site http://extension.arizona.edu/sites/extension.arizona.edu/files/pubs/az1412.pdf (verified 16 March 2015).Google Scholar
Zeng, X., Han, B., Xu, F., Huang, J., Cai, H., and Shi, L. 2012. Effects of modified fertilization technology on the grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of midseason rice. Field Crops Research 137:203–212. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.08.012.Google Scholar
Zhan, X., Healy, M.G., and Li, J. 2009. Nitrogen removal from slaughterhouse wastewater in a sequencing batch reactor under controlled low DO conditions. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering 32:607–614. doi: 10.1007/s00449-008-0283-8.Google Scholar
Zhang, A., Luo, W., Sun, J., Xiao, H., and Liu, W. 2015. Distribution and uptake pathways of organochlorine pesticides in greenhouse and conventional vegetables. Science of the Total Environment 505:1142–1147. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.11.023.Google Scholar
Zhu, Z., Zhang, F., Wang, C., Ran, W., and Shen, Q. 2013. Treating fermentative residues as liquid fertilizer and its efficacy on the tomato growth. Scientia Horticulturae 164:492–498. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2013.10.008.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Roy supplementary material S1

Supplementary Figure

Download Roy supplementary material S1(File)
File 2.1 MB