Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T13:25:46.955Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conservation tillage for organic agriculture: Evolution toward hybrid systems in the western USA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2012

John M. Luna ,
Jeffrey P. Mitchell  and
Anil Shrestha
John M. Luna*
Affiliation:
Luna and Associates, Agro-Ecological Consulting, 24663 Ervin Road, Philomath, OR 97370, USA.
Jeffrey P. Mitchell
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Anil Shrestha
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Science, California State University, Fresno, CA 93740, USA.
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Organic farming has been historically dependent on conventional tillage operations to convert perennial pasture leys to annual crop rotations, incorporate crop residues, compost and cover crops, as well as to mechanically kill existing vegetation. Conventional tillage, however, has long been known to lead to soil degradation and erosion. A recently developed no-till organic production system that uses a roller–crimper technology to mechanically kill cover crops was evaluated in two states in the western United States. In Washington, pumpkins (Cucurbita spp.) grown in a no-till roller–crimper (NT-RC) system produced yields 80% of conventional tillage, but with fewer weeds. However, in California on-farm research trials in organic cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.), tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.), eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.), the no-till system produced virtual crop failure, or yields less than 20% of the standard production method. The major problems associated with rolled cover crops in California included reduced crop seedling emergence, planter impediment with excessive residue, lack of moisture and delay in transplanting of vegetable crops due to continued growth of cover crops, in-season crop competition from cover crop regrowth and impracticability of using cultivators. Further, excessive dry residue during summer in California can present the risk of fire. In both California and Oregon, considerable success has been demonstrated with zone tillage (strip tillage) in conventionally produced field and vegetable crops. In a replicated Oregon trial, the organic strip tillage treatment produced 85% of the broccoli (Brassica oleracea L.) yield compared to a conventional tillage treatment. Our studies suggest that the zone tillage concept may offer opportunities to overcome many of the agronomic challenges facing no-till.

Keywords

no-tillstrip-tillzone tillageconservation tillageroller crimperorganic weed managementcover cropsSecale cereale L.Phacelia tanacetifolia Benth
Type
Preliminary Report
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 27 , Issue 1: Special Issue: Conservation Tillage Strategies in Organic Management Systems , March 2012 , pp. 21 - 30
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1USDA National Organic Program. 2011. Available at Web site http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/nop (accessed December 14, 2011).Google Scholar
2IFOAM. 2002. IFOAM basic standards for organic production and processing. International Federation of Organic Farming Movements, Germany. p. 13–40.Google Scholar
3Grandy, A.S., Robertson, G.P., and Thelen, K.D. 2006. Do productivity and environmental trade-offs justify periodically cultivating no-till cropping systems? Agronomy Journal 98:1377–1383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Morris, D.R., Gilbert, R.A., Reicosky, D.C., and Gesch, R.W. 2004. Oxidation potentials of soil organic matter in histosols under different tillage methods. Soil Science Society of America Journal 68:817–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Mitchell, J.P., Klonsky, K.M., Miyao, E.M., and Hembree, K.J. 2009. Conservation tillage tomato production in California's San Joaquin Valley. Publication 8330. University of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Baker, J.B., Southard, R.J., and Mitchell, J.P. 2005. Agricultural dust production in standard and conservation tillage systems in the San Joaquin Valley. Journal of Environmental Quality 34:1260–1269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Blevins, R.L., Smith, M.S., and Frye, W.W. 1983. Changes in soil properties after 10 years of no-tillage and conventional tilled corn. Soil and Tillage Research 3:135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Lal, R., Griffin, M., Apt, J., Lave, L., and Morgan, M.G. 2004. Managing soil carbon. Science 304–393.Google ScholarPubMed
9Mahboubi, A.A., Lal, R., and Faussey, N.R. 1993. Twenty-eight years of tillage effects on two soils in Ohio. Soil Science Society of America Journal 57:506–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Dick, W.A., McCoy, E.L., Edwards, W.M., and Lal, R. 1991. Continuous application of no-tillage to Ohio soils. Agronomy Journal 83:65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Grandy, A.S., Loecke, T.D., Parr, S., and Robertson, G.P. 2005. Long-term trends in nitrous oxide emissions, soil nitrogen, and crop yields of till and no-till cropping systems. Journal of Environmental Quality 35:1487–1495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Vyn, T.J. and Raimbault, B.A. 1993. Long-term effect of five tillage systems on corn response and soil structure. Agronomy Journal 85:1074–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Trewavas, A. 2004. A critical assessment of organic farming-and-food assertions with particular respect to the UK and the potential environmental benefits of no-till agriculture. Crop Protection 23:757–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Kornecki, T.S., Price, A.J., Raper, R.L., and Arriaga, F.J. 2009. New roller crimper concepts for mechanical termination of cover crops in conservation agriculture. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 24:165–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2002. The knife roller (crimper): an alternative kill method for cover crops. Technical Note No. 13. September 2002.Google Scholar
16Ashford, D.L. and Reeves, D.W. 2003. Use of a mechanical roller-crimper as an alternative kill method for cover crops. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 18:37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Smith, A.N., Reberg-Horton, S.C., Place, G.T., Meijer, A.D., Arellano, C., and Mueller, J.P. 2011. Rolled rye mulch for weed suppression in organic no-tillage soybeans. Weed Science 59:224–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Davis, A.S. 2010. Cover-crop roller–crimper contributes to weed management in no-till soybean. Weed Science 58:300–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Curren, W., Mirsky, S. and Mason, W. 2011. The evolution, status, and future of organic no-till in the northeast US webinar. [Updated March 31, 2011; cited 2011 October 24, 2011]. Available at Web site http://www.extension.org/pages/33063/the-evolution-status-and-future-of-organic-no-till-in-the-northeast-us-webinar (accessed December 14, 2011).Google Scholar
20Collins, D.P., Corbin, A., Benedict, C., Cogger, C., Bary, A., Burrows, C., and Miles, C. 2011. Reducing tillage with cover crops in western Washington organic vegetable production: early research progress and future direction. Tilth Producers Quarterly 21:15–19.Google Scholar
21Creamer, N.G., Bennett, M.A., Stinner, B.R., Cardina, J., and Regnier, E.E. 1996. Mechanisms of weed suppression in cover crop-based production systems. HortScience 31:410–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22McLenaghen, R.D., Cameron, K.C., Lampkin, N.H., Daly, M.L., and Deo, B. 1996. Nitrate leaching from ploughed pasture and the effectiveness of winter catch crops in reducing leaching losses. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 39:413–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Ryan, M.R., Curran, W.S., Grantham, A.M., Hunsberger, L.K., Mirsky, S.B., Mortensen, D.A., Nord, E.A., and Wilson, D.O. 2011. Effects of seeding rate and poultry litter on weed suppression from a rolled cereal rye cover crop. Weed Science 59:438–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Mirsky, S.B., Curran, W.S., Mortensen, D.A., Ryan, M., and Shumway, D.L. 2009. Control of cereal rye with a roller/crimper as influenced by cover crop phenology. Agronomy Journal 101:1589–1596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Barnes, J.P. and Putnam, A.R. 1983. Rye residues contribute weed suppression in no-tillage cropping systems. Journal of Chemical Ecology 9:1045–1057.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26Barnes, J.P. and Putnam, A.R. 1986. Evidence for allelopathy by residues and aqueous extracts of rye (Secale cereale). Weed Science 34:384–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27Perez, F.J. and Ormeno-Nunez, J. 1993. Weed growth interference from temperate cereals: the effect of a hydroxamic-acids-exuding rye (Secale cereale L.) cultivar. Weed Research 33:115–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28Teasdale, J.R. and Mohler, C.L. 1993. Light transmittance, soil temperature, and soil moisture under residue of hairy vetch and rye. Agronomy Journal 85:673–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29Wells, M.S., Reberg-Horton, S.C., and Smith, A.N. 2010. Nitrogen immobilization in a rye (Secale cereale L.) roll-killed system. In Proceedings of the International Annual Meetings of the ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Long Beach, CA. Paper 60014. Available at Web site http://a-c-s.confex.com/crops/2010am/webprogram/Paper60044.html (accessed December 14, 2011).Google Scholar
30Angustia, S.N. 1995. Impact of cover crops on weed abundance and nitrogen contribution in broccoli, Brassica oleracea var italica, production systems in the Maritime Pacific Northwest. MS Thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR. 92 p.Google Scholar
31Sullivan, P.G., Parrish, D.J., and Luna, J.M. 1991. Cover crop contributions to N supply and water conservation in corn production. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 6:106–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32Sainju, U.M., Whitehead, W.F., and Singh, B.P. 2005. Biculture legume-cereal cover crops for enhanced biomass yield and carbon and nitrogen. Agronomy Journal 97:1403–1412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33Mischler, R., Duiker, S.W., Curran, W.S., and Wilson, D. 2010. Hairy vetch management for no-till organic corn production. Agronomy Journal 102:355–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34Mitchell, J.P., Pettygrove, G.S., Upadhyaya, S., Shrestha, A., Fry, R., Roy, R., Hogan, P., Vargas, R., and Hembree, K. 2009. Classification of conservation tillage practices in California irrigated row crop systems. Publication 8364. University of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Davis, CA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35Krzic, M., Fortin, M., and Bomke, A.A. 2001. Sweet corn tillage-planting systems in a humid maritime climate of British Columbia. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 19:25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36Ingels, C.A., Scow, K.M., Whisson, D.A., and Drenovsky, R.E. 2005. Effects of cover crops on grapevines, yield, juice composition, soil microbial ecology, and gopher activity. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 56:1:19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37Smallwood, K.S. 1996. Managing vertebrates in cover crops: a first study. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 11:155–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38Luna, J.M. and Staben, M.L. 2002. Strip tillage for sweet corn production: yield and economic return. HortScience 37:1040–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39Mitchell, J., Shrestha, A., Campbell-Mathews, M., Giacomazzi, D., Goyal, S., Bryant, D., and Herrera, I. 2009. Strip-tillage in California's Central Valley. Publication 8361. University of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Davis, CA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40Janovicek, K.J., Deen, W., and Vyn, T.J. 2006. Soybean response to zone tillage, twin-row planting, and row spacing. Agronomy Journal 98:800–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41Madden, N.M., Southard, R.J., and Mitchell, J.P. 2009. Conservation tillage reduces PM10 emissions in dairy forage rotations. Atmospheric Environment 42:3795–3808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42Nail, E.L., Young, D.L., and Schillinger, W.F. 2007. Diesel and glyphosate price changes benefit the economics of conservation tillage versus traditional tillage. Soil and Tillage Research 94:321–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43Weersink, A., Walker, M., Swanton, C., and Shaw, J.E. 1992. Costs of conventional and conservation tillage systems. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 47:328–334.Google Scholar
44Luna, J.M. 2003. Conservation tillage systems for organic vegetable production. Organic Farming Research Foundation Information Bulletin 12:14–16.Google Scholar
45Luna, J.M. and Staben, M.L. 2003. Strip tillage vegetable production systems for western Oregon. No. EM 8824. Oregon State University Extension Publication, Corvallis, OR, 12 p.Google Scholar
46Merfield, C. 2011. Physical Weeding. Available at Web site http://www.physicalweeding.com/index.htm (accessed December 14, 2011).Google Scholar
47Peigné, J., Ball, B.C., Roger-Estrade, J., and David, C. 2007. Is conservation tillage suitable for organic farming? A review. Soil Use and Management 23:129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48Berner, A., Hildermann, I., Fliessbach, A., Pfiffner, L., Niggli, U., and Mäder, P. 2008. Crop yield and soil quality response to reduced tillage under organic management. Soil and Tillage Research 101:89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar