Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T11:45:11.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conservation agriculture in Laos: Diffusion and determinants for adoption of direct seeding mulch-based cropping systems in smallholder agriculture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 December 2011

Guillaume Lestrelin ,
Hoa Tran Quoc ,
Frédéric Jullien ,
Bounmy Rattanatray ,
Chantasone Khamxaykhay  and
Florent Tivet
Guillaume Lestrelin*
Affiliation:
Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, UMR 220 GRED (IRD UPV Montpellier 3), Montpellier, France.
Hoa Tran Quoc
Affiliation:
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (CIRAD), Montpellier, France.
Frédéric Jullien
Affiliation:
Programme de Capitalisation en Appui aux Politiques de Développement Rural (PCADR), Vientiane, Lao PDR.
Bounmy Rattanatray
Affiliation:
Programme de Capitalisation en Appui aux Politiques de Développement Rural (PCADR), Vientiane, Lao PDR. Provincial Agriculture and Forestry Office (PAFO), Sayaboury, Lao PDR.
Chantasone Khamxaykhay
Affiliation:
National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute (NAFRI), Vientiane, Lao PDR.
Florent Tivet
Affiliation:
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (CIRAD), Montpellier, France.
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Over the past half-century, major efforts have been made worldwide to develop sustainable alternatives to agricultural tillage. In line with these efforts, two main research development initiatives have supported the experimentation and dissemination of conservation agriculture (CA) in Laos. Here we present the results of a 4-year monitoring and evaluation study conducted in 21 villages targeted for dissemination. In a context of rapid transition to intensive commercial agriculture in Laos, CA has become an important constituent of agricultural landscapes. However, there are significant variations in adoption rates across the study region. Statistical and qualitative evidence suggests that experimentation and adoption are not contingent upon farm-level variables such as capital, labor, age and education. While access to land helps shape local decision-making, the land tenure threshold under which farmers are not willing to experiment with alternative cropping systems is relatively low and highly variable in both space and time. Rather, experience and awareness of land degradation, production costs, social cohesion and leadership appear to be key factors in explaining most variations in local adoption rates. These results indicate that the practice of CA is not necessarily incompatible with smallholder farming. However, while complex crop associations and rotations are necessary for integrated weed control and reduced chemical use, their diffusion would require a broader transformation of the agricultural industry and the current market demand.

Keywords

smallholdersagricultural innovationconservation agriculturedirect seeding mulch-based cropping systemsadoptionSouth-East Asia
Type
Research Papers
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 27 , Issue 1: Special Issue: Conservation Tillage Strategies in Organic Management Systems , March 2012 , pp. 81 - 92
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Bolliger, A., Magid, J., Amado, T.J.C., Neto, F.S., Ribeiro, M.F.S., Calegari, A., Ralisch, R., and De Neergaard, A. 2006. Taking stock of the Brazilian ‘zero-till revolution’: A review of landmark research and farmers' practice. Advances in Agronomy 91:47–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Séguy, L., Bouzinac, S., Trentini, A., and Cortez, N.A. 1996. Brazilian agriculture in new immigration zones. Agriculture Development 12:2–61.Google Scholar
3Séguy, L. and Bouzinac, S. 2008. La symphonie inachevée du semis direct dans le Brésil central. Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement, Montpellier, France.Google Scholar
4AFD and FFEM. 2007. Direct Seeding Mulch-Based Cropping System (DMC): An Alternative to Conventional Cropping Systems in Developing Countries. Agence Française de Développement and Fond Français pour l'Environnement Mondial, Paris, France.Google Scholar
5Balarabé, O., Abou Abba, A., Olivier, D., and Naudin, K. 2008. Structured or spontaneous extension of DMC techniques in small scale cotton based agriculture? The northern Cameroon case study. In Chanphengxay, M., Khamhung, A., Panyasiri, K., Chabanne, A., Tran Quoc, H., Jullien, F., Lienhard, P., and Tivet, F. (eds). Proceedings of the Regional Workshop on Conservation Agriculture, Investing in Sustainable Agriculture: The case of Conservation Agriculture and Direct Seeding Mulch-Based Cropping Systems. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Vientiane, Laos. p. 224–233.Google Scholar
6Boulakia, S., Kou, P., San, S., and Chit, K. 2008. Five years of adaptive research for upland DMC-based cropping systems creation in Cambodia. In Chanphengxay, M., Khamhung, A., Panyasiri, K., Chabanne, A., Tran Quoc, H., Jullien, F., Lienhard, P., and Tivet, F. (eds). Proceedings of the Regional Workshop on Conservation Agriculture, Investing in Sustainable Agriculture: The case of Conservation Agriculture and Direct Seeding Mulch-Based Cropping Systems. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Vientiane, Laos. p. 37–49.Google Scholar
7Chabiersky, S., Penot, E., Husson, O., Dabat, M.H., Andriamalala, H., and Domas, R. 2008. Determinants of DMC technologies adoption among smallholders in thelake Alaotra area, Madagascar. In Chanphengxay, M., Khamhung, A., Panyasiri, K., Chabanne, A., Tran Quoc, H., Jullien, F., Lienhard, P., and Tivet, F. (eds). Proceedings of the Regional Workshop on Conservation Agriculture, Investing in Sustainable Agriculture: The case of Conservation Agriculture and Direct Seeding Mulch-Based Cropping Systems. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Vientiane, Laos. p. 177–194.Google Scholar
8Jullien, F., Tivet, F., Lestrelin, G., Tran Quoc, H., Lienhard, P., Chabanne, A., Khamhung, A., Panyasiri, K., Rattanatray, B., Julien, P., and Séguy, L. 2008. A farmer-group based approach linking research and development for the promotion of Conservation Agriculture in the Lao PDR. In Chanphengxay, M., Khamhung, A., Panyasiri, K., Chabanne, A., Tran Quoc, H., Jullien, F., Lienhard, P., and Tivet, F. (eds). Proceedings of the Regional Workshop on Investing in Sustainable Agriculture: The case of Conservation Agriculture and Direct Seeding Mulch-Based Cropping Systems. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Vientiane, Laos. p. 196–207.Google Scholar
9FAO. 2007. Conservation Agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. Available at Web site http://www.fao.org/ag/ca/ (accessed 15 June, 2009).Google Scholar
10Derpsch, R. and Friedrich, T. 2009. global overview of conservation agriculture adoption. In Indian Council of Agricultural Research (eds). Proceedings of the Fourth World Congress on Conservation Agriculture, 4–7 February 2009, New Delhi, India, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi. p. 429–438.Google Scholar
11FAO. 2008. Investing in Sustainable Agricultural Intensification: The role of Conservation Agriculture (A Framework for Action). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
12Erenstein, O. 2003. Smallholder conservation farming in the tropics and sub-tropics: A guide to the development and dissemination of mulching with crop residues and cover crops. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 100:17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Affholder, F., Jourdain, D., Quang, D.D., Tuong, T.P., Morize, M., and Ricome, A. 2009. Constraints to farmers' adoption of direct-seeding mulch-based cropping systems: A farm scale modeling approach applied to the mountainous slopes of Vietnam. Agricultural Systems 103:51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Giller, K.E., Witter, E., Corbeels, M., and Tittonell, P. 2009. Conservation agriculture and smallholder farming in Africa: The heretics' view. Field Crops Research 114:23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Castella, J.C., Chantharat, B., Thirasack, S., and Trébuil, G. 1993. Le cotonnier au Laos: les enseignements d'une expérience de recherche-développement-formation. Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement, Montpellier, France.Google Scholar
16Slaats, J. and Lestrelin, G. 2009. Improving Cropping Systems by Introducing Conservation Agriculture: Taking Stock of the Results and Methodology of Research-Development in Southern Sayaboury Province, Lao PDR. Programme de Capitalisation en Appui à la Politique de Développement Rural, Vientiane, Laos.Google Scholar
17Laffort, J.-R. 1998. Des Tracteurs Dans les Vallées. Comité de Coopération avec le Laos, Paris, France.Google Scholar
18Ducourtieux, O., Laffort, J.-R., and Sacklokham, S. 2005. Land policy and farming practices in Laos. Development and Change 36:499–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Tran Quoc, H., Khamxaykhay, C., Tivet, F., Chantharath, B., and Panaysiri, K. 2005. Impact of technologies and market access on natural resources and farming systems, southern Xayabury. In Tivet, F., Tran Quoc, H., Lienhard, P., Chabanne, A., and Panyasiri, K. (eds). Development and Implementation of Direct Seeding Mulch-Based Cropping Systems in South-East Asia. Programme National Agro-Ecologie, Vientiane, Laos. p. 33–44.Google Scholar
20Saioudom, L. 2008. Risques Sanitaires Liés aux Pesticides chez les Agriculteurs, Province de Sayaboury, Laos. Institut de la Francophonie pour la Médecine Tropicale, Vientiane, Laos.Google Scholar
21Montgomery, D.R. 2007. Soil erosion and agricultural sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104:13268–13272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Triplett, G.B. and Dick, W.A. 2008. No-tillage crop production: A revolution in agriculture. Agronomy Journal 100:153–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Rhoton, F.E. 2000. Influence of time on soil response to no-till practices. Soil Sciences Society of America Journal 64:700–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Chivenge, P.P., Murwira, H.K., Giller, K.E., Mapfumo, P., and Six, J. 2007. Long-term impact of reduced tillage and residue management on soil carbon stabilization: Implications for conservation agriculture on contrasting soils. Soil and Tillage Research 94:328–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Govaerts, B., Sayre, K.D., Goudeseune, B., De Corte, P., Lichter, K., Dendooven, L., and Deckers, J. 2009. Conservation agriculture as a sustainable option for the central Mexican highlands. Soil and Tillage Research 103:222–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Knowler, D. and Bradshaw, B. 2007. Farmers' adoption of conservation agriculture: A review and synthesis of recent research. Food Policy 32:25–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27Swinton, S.M. 2000. More Social Capital, Less Erosion: Evidence From Peru's Antiplano. Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, USA.Google Scholar
28Buhler, D.D. 2002. Challenges and opportunities for integrated weed management. Weed Science 50:273–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29Dabney, S.M., Delgado, J.A., and Reeves, D.W. 2001. Using winter cover crops to improve soil and water quality. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 32:1221–1250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar