Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T15:16:44.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Attitudes of dining customers towards sustainability-related food values at a public University campus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2019

Erin Silva ,
Jenna Klink ,
Emily McKinney ,
Jessica Price ,
Philip Deming ,
Hannah Rivedal  and
Jed Colquhoun
Erin Silva*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1630 Linden Drive, Madison, WI53706, USA
Jenna Klink
Affiliation:
Environmental Resources Center, University of Wisconsin-Extension, 445 Henry Mall, Madison, WI53706, USA
Emily McKinney
Affiliation:
Environmental Resources Center, University of Wisconsin-Extension, 445 Henry Mall, Madison, WI53706, USA
Jessica Price
Affiliation:
Environmental Resources Center, University of Wisconsin-Extension, 445 Henry Mall, Madison, WI53706, USA
Philip Deming
Affiliation:
Environmental Resources Center, University of Wisconsin-Extension, 445 Henry Mall, Madison, WI53706, USA
Hannah Rivedal
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, 2082 Cordley Hall, Corvallis, OR97331, USA
Jed Colquhoun
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1575 Linden Drive, Madison, WI53706, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Erin Silva, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The plethora of alternative food labels emerging in the marketplace reflects consumer interest in informed and sustainable purchasing. However, consumers’ preferences vary with respect to the sustainability metrics represented by labeling programs. The goal of this project was to characterize public university students’ perceptions of product parameters commonly represented by food labels for produce (e.g., cost, taste, certified organic, locally grown). A consumer survey (n = 338) was conducted at two university dining halls, located in close proximity to major residence hall communities which house approximately 2600 students. Culinary, health and cost attributes (taste, nutritional value, price and appearance) were ranked as more influential in determining purchasing decisions than sustainability attributes related to production and sourcing. While sustainability values were not as influential in driving purchasing behaviors as compared with product attributes, they were important to approximately 50% of the survey respondents. By identifying the sustainability values of students and their willingness to pay more for specific types of sustainable food, results from this study can inform efforts to align priorities of campus dining services with the values of their student patrons, as well as identify educational opportunities around agriculture and food production.

Keywords

Food labelsfood systemsfood valuesstudent food surveysustainable purchasinguniversity dining halls
Type
From the Field
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , June 2020 , pp. 221 - 226
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Present address: Extension Office of Program Support Services, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 432 N Lake St, Madison, WI 53706, USA.

References

Babich, R and Smith, S (2010) “Cradle to grave”: an analysis of sustainable food systems in a university setting. Journal of Culinary Science & Technology 8, 180–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banterle, A, Fritz, M and Cereda, E (2010) Labelling and environmental sustainability in food supply networks: an empirical analysis in Italy and Germany, Proceedings of the 119th EAAE Seminar, Capri, Italy, June 30–July 1, 2010.Google Scholar
Barham, E (2002) Towards a theory of values-based labeling. Agriculture and Human Values 19, 349–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlett, PF (2011) Campus sustainable food projects: critique and engagement. American Anthropologist 113, 101–115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartels, J and Onwezen, MC (2014) Consumers’ willingness to buy products with environmental and ethical claims: the roles of social representations and social identity. International Journal of Consumer Studies 38, 82–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bezbatchenko, AW (2010) Sustainability in colleges and universities: toward institutional culture shifts. Journal of Student Affairs at New York University 6, 1–11.Google Scholar
Blanco-Portela, N, Benayas, J, Pertierra, LR and Lozano, R (2017) Towards the integration of sustainability in Higher Education Institutions: a review of drivers of and barriers to organisational change and their comparison against those found of companies. Journal of Cleaner Production 166, 563–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpio, C and Isengildina-Massa, O (2009) Consumer willingness to pay for locally grown products: the case of South Carolina. Agribusiness 25, 412–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrigan, M and Attalla, A (2001) The myth of the ethical consumer – do ethics matter in purchase behaviour? Journal of Consumer Marketing 18, 560–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, K, Bernard, J and Pesek, J (2013) Consumer preferences for tomatoes: the influence of local, organic, and state program promotions by purchasing venue. Journal of Agricultural Resource Economics 38, 379–396.Google Scholar
Connolly, C and Klaiber, H (2014) Does organic command a premium when the food is already local? American. Journal of Agricultural Economics 96, 1102–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connors, M, Bisogni, CA, Sobal, J and Devine, CM (2001) Managing values in personal food systems. Appetite 36, 189–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Constanigro, M, Thilmany, DM, Kroll, S and Nurse, G (2011) An In-Store Valuation of Local and Organic Apples: The Role of Social Desirability. Agrobuisness 27, 465–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costanigro, M, Deselnicu, O and McFadden, DT (2016) Product differentiation via corporate social responsibility: consumer priorities and the mediating role of food labels. Agriculture and Human Values 33, 597–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahm, MJ, Samonte, A and Shows, AR (2009) Organic foods: do eco-friendly attitudes predict eco-friendly behaviors? Journal of American College Health 58, 195–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denver, S and Jensen, J (2014) Consumer preferences for organically and locally produced apples. Food Quality and Preference 31, 129–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feenstra, G, Allen, P, Hardesty, S, Ohmart, J and Perez, J (2011) Using a supply chain analysis to assess the sustainability of farm-to-institution programs. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development 1, 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hand, M (2009) Local food systems: Emerging research and policy issues. USDA conference, June 26, 2009.Google Scholar
Hazenzade, V, Osburg, V-S and Toporowski, W (2018) Selecting decision-relevant ethical product attributes for grocery shopping. Management Decision 56, 584–602.Google Scholar
Howard, PH and Allen, P (2006) Beyond organic: consumer interest in new labeling schemes in the central coast of California. International Journal of Consumer Studies 30, 439–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janßen, D and Langen, N (2017) The bunch of sustainability labels - do consumers differentiate? Journal of Cleaner Production 143, 1233–1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langen, N, Roidl, V and Hartmann, M (2010) How important are Fair Trade, organic production and Cause-related Marketing for the product choice - the use of the Information Display Matrix to uncover the information search process. Paper Presented at the 11th Biennial ISEE Conference ‘Advancing Sustainability in a Time of Crisis’, August 22-25, 2010, Oldenburg and Bremen, Germany.Google Scholar
Lockie, S, Lyons, K, Lawrence, G and Grice, J (2004) Choosing organics: a path analysis of factors underlying the selection of organic food among Australian consumers. Appetite 43, 135–146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lusk, JL and Briggeman, BC (2009) Food values. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 91, 184–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdiarmid, JI, Kyle, J, Horgan, GW, Loe, J, Fyfe, C, Johnstone, A and McNeill, G (2012) Sustainable diets for the future: can we contribute to reducing greenhouse gas emissions by eating a healthy diet? American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 96, 632–639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manning, S, Boons, F, von Hagen, O and Reinecke, J (2012) National contexts matter: the co-evolution of sustainability standards in global value chains. Ecological Economics 83, 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marquis, M (2005) Exploring convenience orientation as a food motivation for college students living in residence halls. International Journal of Consumer Studies 29, 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naderi, I and Van Steenburg, E (2018) Me first, then the environment: young millennials as green consumers. Young Consumers 19, 280–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelletier, JE, Laska, MN, Neumark-Sztainer, D and Story, M (2013) Positive attitudes toward organic, local, and sustainable foods are associated with higher dietary quality among young adults. Journal of the Academy of Nutritionists and Dieticians 113, 127–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Porter, J, Conner, D, Kolodinsky, J and Trubek, A (2017) Get real: an analysis of student preference for real food. Agriculture and Human Values 34, 921–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ralph, M and Stubbs, W (2014) Integrating environmental sustainability into universities. Higher Education 67, 71–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ray, C (1998) Culture, intellectual property, and territorial rural development. Sociologia Rural 38, 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raynolds, LT (2002) Consumer/producer links in fair trade coffee networks. Sociologia Rural 42, 404–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Real Food Challenge (2018) Accessed at https://www.realfoodchallenge.org/.Google Scholar
Robinson, R and Smith, C (2002) Psychosocial and demographic variables associated with consumer intention to purchase sustainably produced foods as defined by the Midwest Food Alliance. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior 34, 316–325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sebastiani, R, Montagnini, F and Dalli, D (2013) Ethical consumption and new business models in the food industry: evidence from the Eataly case. Journal of Business Ethics 114, 473–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seyfrang, G (2006) Ecological citizenship and sustainable consumption: examining local organic food networks. Journal of Rural Studies 22, 383–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shreck, A (2005) Resistance, redistribution and power in the fair trade banana initiative. Agriculture and Human Values 22, 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrum, LJ, McCarty, JA and Lowrey, TM (1995) Buyer characteristics of the green consumer and their implications for advertising strategy. Journal of Advertising 24, 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smola, KW and Sutton, CD (2002) Generational differences: revisiting generational work values for the new millennium. Journal of Organizational Behavior 23, 363–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spain, CV, Freund, D, Mohan-Gibbons, H, Meadow, RG and Beacham, L (2018) Are they buying it? United States consumers’ changing attitudes toward more humanely raised meat, eggs, and dairy. Animals 8, 128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tang, E, Fryxell, GE and Chow, CSF (2004) Visual and verbal communication in the design of eco-label for green consumer products. Journal of International Consumer Marketing. 16, 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeir, I and Verbeke, W (2008) Sustainable food consumption among young adults in Belgium: theory of planned behaviour and the role of confidence and values. Ecological Economics 64, 542–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zander, K and Hamm, U (2010) Consumer preferences for additional ethical attributes of organic food. Food Quality Preferences 21, 495–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar