Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T01:35:39.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Energy efficiency in small-scale biointensive organic onion production in Pennsylvania, USA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2010

Stephen R. Moore*
Affiliation:
The Center for Environmental Farming Systems, Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

Modern agriculture relies heavily on fossil energy for food production. Reducing fossil energy and replacing that energy with renewable energy is critical in attaining a sustainable food system. Hand-scale intensive food production offers a reduction in fossil energy and an increased use of renewable human-based energy. Using biointensive production techniques, onions (Allium cepa) were grown in Pennsylvania, USA. A life-cycle analysis was performed to monitor energy utilization. Individual human labor tasks were evaluated using the factor method. This method accounts for the type and duration of physical activity. The average yield of eight onion varieties utilizing biointensive production in standard-sized beds (9.3 m2;100 ft2) was 160.2 kg. The US average for mechanical onion production is 46.1 kg/9.3 m2 (100 ft2). The energy efficiency ratio, specific energy and energy productivity were 51.5, 0.03 MJ kg−1 and 32.2 kg MJ−1 (MJ=megajoule), respectively. When defined within common boundaries, these three relationships: energy input, energy output and yield productivity allow researchers, farmers and policy-makers to select production systems and/or practices that better manage fossil and renewable energy for food production. Current mechanized agriculture has an energy efficiency ratio of 0.9. With most energy being supplied by fossil fuels. The energy efficiency for biointensive production of onions in our study was over 50 times higher than this value (51.5) and 83% of the total energy required is renewable energy. Biointensive production offers a viable energy use alternative to current production practices and may contribute to a more sustainable food system.

Type
Preliminary Report
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Khan, S., Khan, M.A., Hanjra, M.A., and Mu, J. 2009. Pathways to reduce the environmental footprints of water and energy inputs in food production. Food Policy 34:141149.Google Scholar
2Mushtaq, S., Maraseni, T., Maroulis, J., and Hafeez, M. 2009. Energy and water tradeoffs in enhancing food security: a selective international assessment. Energy Policy 37:36353644.Google Scholar
3Kizilaslan, H. 2009. Input–output energy analysis of cherries production in Tokat Province of Turkey. Applied Energy 86:13541358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Pimentel, D., Pleasant, A., Barron, J., Gaudioso, J., Pollock, N., Chae, E., Kim, Y., Lassiter, A., Schiavoni, C., Jackson, A., Lee, M., and Eaton, A. 2002. U.S. Energy Conservation and Efficiency: Benefits and Costs. College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
5Leach, G. 1975. Energy and food production. Food Policy Nov.:6268.Google Scholar
6Pathak, B.S. and Singh, D. 1980. Effect of post-harvest processing on energy returns in agriculture, with special reference to developing countries. Energy 5:6974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Jeavons, J.C. 2001. Biointensive sustainable mini-farming. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 19(2):49–106.Google Scholar
8Jeavons, J.C. 2006. How to Grow More Vegetables. 7th ed.Ten Speed Press, Berkley, CA.Google Scholar
9Glenn, E., Clement, C., Brannon, P., and Leigh, L. 1990. Sustainable food production for a complete diet. HortScience 25(12):15071512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Holt, B.F. and Smith, I.K. 1998. Small-scale, intensive cultivation methods: the effects of deep hand tillage on the productivity of bush beans and red beets. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 3(1):2839.Google Scholar
11Barrett, C.B. 1993. On price risk and the inverse farm size-productivity relationship. University of Wisconsin-Madison Department of Agriculture Economics Staff Paper Series No. 369.Google Scholar
12Stone, D.A. 1982. The effects of subsoil loosening and deep incorporation of nutrients on yield of broad beans, cabbage, leek, potatoes and red beet. Journal of Agricultural Science 98:297306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Schahczenski, J.J. 1984. Energetics and traditional agricultural systems: a review. Agricultural Systems 14:3143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14USDA. NRCS Soil Survey of York County, Pennsylvania [Online] [cited 1 October 2009]. Available at Web site http://www.soildatamart.nrcs.usda.gov/Manuscripts/PA133/0/PA_York.pdfGoogle Scholar
15Tharion, W.J., Lieberma, H.R., Montain, S.J., Young, A.J., Baker-Fulco, C.J., DeLany, J.P., and Hoyt, R.W. 2005. Energy requirements of military personnel. Appetite 64:4765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Duhon, D. 1985. One Circle. Ecology Action, Willits, CA.Google Scholar
17Subcommittee of the Food and Nutrition Board. 1989. Recommended Dietary Allowances, 10th ed.Commission on Life Sciences, National Research Council, National Academy of Science, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
18Canakci, M. and Akinci, I. 2006. Energy use pattern analysis of greenhouse vegetable production. Energy 31:12431256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Bowyer, J.L. 2004. Environmental benefits of wood as a building material. In Evans, J., Burley, J., and Youngquist, J. (eds). Encyclopedia of Forest Sciences. Elsevier Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
20Boustead, I. and Hancock, G.F. 1979. Handbook of Industrial Energy Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
21Hessel, Z.R. 1992. Energy and alternatives for fertilizer and pesticide use. In Flick, R.C. (ed.). Energy in World Agriculture, Volume 6. Elsevier Science Publishing, New York, NY. p. 177201.Google Scholar
22Bayramoglu, Z. and Gundogmus, E. 2009. The effect of EurepGAP standards on energy input use: a comparative analysis between certified and uncertified greenhouse tomato producers in Turkey. Energy Conservation and Management 50:5256.Google Scholar
23Liu, Y., Hǿgh-Jensen, H., Egelyng, H., and Langer, V. 2010. Energy efficiency for organic pear production in greenhouses in China. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 25:000–000.Google Scholar
24Mohammadi, A., Tabatabaeefar, A., Shahin, S., Rafiee, S., and Keyhani, A. 2008. Energy use and economical analysis of potato production in Iran a case study: Ardabil Province. Energy Conservation and Management 49:35663570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Norman, M.J.T. 1978. Energy inputs and outputs of subsistence cropping systems in the tropics. Agro-Ecosystems 4:356368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Brinton, , 2008. What is your compost energy index? Biocycle, February.Google Scholar
27US Department of Agriculture. 2005. Agricultural Statistics. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
28Glenn, E. 2001. Biosphere II sustainable soil fertility test. In Proceedings from the Soil, Food and People Conference: A Biointenisve Model for the Next Century. Ecology Action, Willits, CA. p. 110115.Google Scholar
29Onstad, D. 1996. Whole Foods Companion. Chelsea Green Publishing, White River Junction, VT. p. 528.Google Scholar
30Cervinka, V., Chancellor, R.J., Curley, R.G., and Dobie, J.B. 1974. Energy requirements for agriculture in California. California Department of Food and Agriculture, Sacramento, CA.Google Scholar
31Pimentel, D. and Burgess, M. 1980. Energy inputs in corn production. In Pimentel, D. (ed.). Handbook of Energy Utilization in Agriculture. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. p. 475.Google Scholar
32Pimentel, D. and Pimentel, M. 1996. Food, Energy and Society. University Press of Colorado, Niwot, CO.Google Scholar
33Fluck, R.C. 1979. Energy productivity: a measure of energy utilization in agricultural systems. Agricultural Systems 4:2937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar