Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T15:20:34.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Collaboration and diverse stakeholder participation in food system planning: a case study from Central New York

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2018

Evan Weissman  and
Matthew Potteiger
Evan Weissman*
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health, Food Studies and Nutrition, Syracuse University, 540 White Hall, Syracuse, New York13244, USA
Matthew Potteiger
Affiliation:
Department of Landscape Architecture, State University of New York, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, New York, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Evan Weissman, Tel: 315.443.4295 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Onondaga County Agriculture Council was created in 2012 to promote and support the county's farms, improve the connections between the county's urban core of Syracuse and the surrounding agricultural areas, and to develop policy to support agricultural production and food system development. In short, the purpose of the Council is to strengthen the Onondaga County food system. This goal, however, is ambiguous and Council members recognized a limited understanding of the current structure and function of the Central New York (CNY) food system. As such, the Council provided support for FoodPlanCNY, a project designed to identify food system assets and opportunities to strengthen the economic opportunities, public health outcomes and environmental sustainability of the CNY food system. This paper reports preliminary findings from this initial effort to engage participatory food system planning in CNY.

Keywords

Asset-based approachdiverse stakeholdersfood assessmentfood planninggovernance
Type
From the Field
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , April 2020 , pp. 115 - 119
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, E and Clark, R (2011) How It's Done: An Invitation to Social Research, 4th Edn. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Barrett, C (2010) Measuring food insecurity. Science 327, 825–828.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Born, B and Purcell, M (2006) Avoiding the local trap: scale and food systems in planning research. Journal of Planning Education and Research 26, 195–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, F and Kendall, S (2013) Making sense of assets: what can an assets based approach offer public health? Critical Public Health 23, 127–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burawoy, M (2005) For public sociology. American Sociological Review 70, 4–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, M and Barrett, C (2006) The economics of poverty traps and persistent poverty: an asset-based approach. The Journal of Development Studies 42, 178–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creswell, J (2003) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2016) Food for the cities programme. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i5502e.pdf.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) & Resource Centres on Urban Agriculture and Food Security (RUAF) (2015) City region food systems. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4789e.pdf.Google Scholar
Hale, C (ed) (2008) Engaging Contradictions: Theory, Politics and Methods of Activist Scholarship. Berkeley, CA: The University of California Press, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
Hamm, M and Bellows, A (2003) Community food security and nutrition educators. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior 35, 37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jargowsky, P (2015) Architecture of Segregation: Civil Unrest, the Concentration or Poverty, and Public Policy. Report: Race and Inequality. Washington, DC: The Century Foundation (https://tcf.org/content/report/architecture-of-segregation/).Google Scholar
Kretzmann, J and McKnight, J (1993) Building Communities from the Inside Out: A Path toward Finding and Mobilizing a Community's Assets. Chicago, IL: ACTA Publications.Google Scholar
Kurtz, H (2003) Scale frames and counter-scale frames: constructing the problem of environmental justice. Political Geography 22, 887–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemke, S and Bellows, A (2012) Qualitative and mixed methods approaches to explore social dimensions of food and nutrition security. In Albala, K (ed), Routledge International Handbook of Food Studies. London: Routledge, pp. 318–328.Google Scholar
Mathie, A and Cunningham, G (2005) Who is driving development? Reflections on the transformative potential of asset-based community development. Canadian Journal of Development Studies 26, 175–186. doi: 10.1080/02255189.2005.9669031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyden, P, Figert, A, Shibley, M and Burrows, D (1997) Building Community: Social Science in Action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
Peters, CJ, Clancy, K, Hinrichs, CC and Goetz, S (2017) Introduction to the EFSNE project collection of papers. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development 7, 159–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pothukuchi, K and Kaufman, J (2000) The food system: a stranger to the planning field. Journal of the American Planning Association 66, 113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potteiger, M (2013) Eating places: food systems, narratives, networks, and spaces. Landscape Journal 32, 261–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raja, S, Morgan, K and Hall, E (2017) Planning for equitable urban and regional food systems. Built Environment 43, 309–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, K and Cohen, N (2016) Beyond the Kale: Urban Agriculture and Social Justice Activism in New York City. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Smith, N (1992) Geography, difference and the politics of scale. In Doherty, J, Graham, E and Malek, M (eds), Postmodernism and the Social Sciences. London: Macmillan, pp. 57–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C and Kurtz, H (2003) Community gardens and politics of scale in New York City. Geographical Review 93, 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vatsa, K (2004) Risk, vulnerability, and asset-based approach to disaster risk management. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 24, 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weissman, E et al. (2018) Forthcoming. Making Mistakes in the Practice of Activist-Scholarship. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies: www.acme-journal.org.Google Scholar