Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T16:21:23.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Business opportunity assessment in Slovene organic spelt processing: application of real options model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Karmen Pažek  and
Črtomir Rozman
Karmen Pažek*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Maribor, Pivola 10, 2311 Hoče, Slovenia.
Črtomir Rozman
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Maribor, Pivola 10, 2311 Hoče, Slovenia.
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Decision making in organic farming is related to risk and uncertainty, and options must be evaluated in the decision-making process. This paper presents the methodology of an integrated deterministic simulation system (KARSIM 1.0) application for decision-making support on organic farms in northeastern Slovenia. An emphasis to modify the net present value (NPVt) criterion by incorporating the real options approach was made. Its application is shown in organic spelt (Triticum aestivum ssp. spelta McKey) production and processing using two real options approaches, the Black–Scholes and binomial models. The NPVt indicates that the decision to process spelt for animal fodder is financially unfeasible, while the real options approach differentiates the results by organic spelt grain and flour production for human nutrition. It may be concluded that the real options approach can be useful when assessing projects with uncertainty, sunk costs and irreversibility, and it can provide for examining agricultural investment decisions.

Keywords

farm decision makingbinomial modelBlack–Scholes modelnet present valueorganic spelt
Type
Preliminary Report
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , September 2011 , pp. 179 - 184
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Pažek, K. 2006. Integrated computer simulation model KARSIM 1.0. Internal database, University of Maribor, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Slovenia.Google Scholar
Pažek, K., Rozman, Č., Borec, A., Turk, J., Majkovič, D., Bavec, M., and Bavec, F. 2006. The use of multi criteria models for decision support on organic farms. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 24(1):73–89.Google Scholar
Amram, M. and Kulatilaka, N. 1999. Real Options: Managing Strategic Investment in an Uncertain World. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA. p. 246.Google Scholar
Collins, R. and Hanf, C.H. 1998. Evaluation of farm investments: biases in net present value estimates from using quasi-deterministic models in an uncertain world. Agricultural Finance Review 58:81–91.Google Scholar
Dixit, A. and Pindyck, R. 1994. Investment under Uncertainty. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. p. 468.Google Scholar
Tegene, A., Wiebe, K., and Kuhn, B. 1999. Irreversible investment under uncertainty: conservation easements and the option to develop agricultural land. Journal of Agricultural Economics 50(2):203–219.Google Scholar
Turk, J. and Rozman, Č. 2002. A feasibility study of fruit brandy production. Agricultura 1(1):28–33.Google Scholar
Brennan, M. and Schwartz, E. 1985. Evaluating natural resource investments. Business 58:135–157.Google Scholar
Dalila-Fontes, B.M.M. 2008. Fixed versus flexible production systems: a real options analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 188:169–184.Google Scholar
Nishihara, M. and Fukushima, M. 2008. Evaluation of firm's loss due to incomplete information in real investment decision. European Journal of Operational Research 188:569–585.Google Scholar
Pandza, K., Horsburgh, S., Gorton, K., and Polajnar, A. 2003. A real options approach to managing resources and capabilities. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 23(9):1010–1032.Google Scholar
Hadelan, L., Njavro, M., and Par, V. 2008. Option models in investment appraisal. In 43rd Croatian and 3rd International Symposium on Agriculture. Book of Abstracts. p. 47–48.Google Scholar
Khanna, M., Isik, M., and Winter–Nelson, A. 2000. Investment in site-specific crop management under uncertainty: implications for nitrogen pollution control and environmental policy. Agriculture Economics 24:9–21.Google Scholar
Musshoff, O. and Odening, M. 2005. Adoption of Organic Farming. Real Options, Theory Meets Practice, 9th Annual International Conference, Paris, France, June 22–25.Google Scholar
Kuminoff, N. and Wossink, A. 2010. Why isn't more US farmland organic? Journal of Agricultural Economics 61(2):240–258.Google Scholar
Tzouramani, I. and Mattas, K. 2009. Evaluating economic incentives for Greek organic agriculture: a real options approach. In Rezitis, A. (ed.). E-Book Series, Research Topics in Agricultural and Applied Economics. Volume 1. Benthan Science Publishers, p. 23–35.Google Scholar
Musshoff, O. and Hirschhauet, N. 2008. Adoption of organic farming in Germany and Austria: an integrative dynamic investment perspective. Agricultural Economics 39: 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
http://www.zveza-ekokmet.si/ekoloko-kmetijstvo/analiza-stanja-ekolokega-kmetijstva (accessed December 6, 2010).Google Scholar
Csaki, C. 1985. Simulation and System Analysis in Agriculture. Elsevier, Amsterdam. p. 262.Google Scholar
Rozman, Č., Tojnko, S., Turk, J., Par, V., and Pavlovič, M. 2002. Die Anwendung eines Computersimulationsmodells zur Optimierung der Erweiterung einer Apfelplantage unter den Bedingungen der Republik Slowenien. Berichte über Landwirtscahft 80(4):632–642.Google Scholar
Kljajić, M., Bernik, I., and Škraba, A. 2000. Simulation approach to decision assessment in enterprises. Simulation 75(4):199–210.Google Scholar
Morgan, D.G., Abdallah, S.B., and Lasserre, P. 2007. A real options approach to forest-management decision making to protect Caribou under the threat of extinction. Ecology and Society 13(1):27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, F., and Scholes, M. 1973. The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy 81(5–6):637–654.Google Scholar
Cox, J.C. and Rubinstein, M. 1979. Option pricing: a simplified approach. Financial Economy 7:229–263 (Reprinted in The Handbook of Financial Engineering, Harper Business Publishers, 1990).Google Scholar
Rozman, Č., Pažek, K., Bavec, M., Bavec, F., Turk, J., and Majkovič, D. 2006. The multi-criteria analysis of spelt food processing alternatives on small organic farms. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 28:159–179.Google Scholar
Winter, N.A. and Amegbeto, K. 1998. Option values to conservation and agricultural price policy: Application to terrace construction in Kenya. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80:409–418.Google Scholar