Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:55:03.374Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Shakespeare's Pacifism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Steven Marx
Steven Marx*
Affiliation:
California Polytechnic State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Like Youth and Age or Reason and Passion, War and Peace was one of those polarities that Renaissance writers persistently thought about as well as with. Reflection upon war and peace was at the heart of the Humanist movement, just as the conduct of war and peace was at the foundation of the European state system during the early modern period. This concern with war and peace arose from Humanism's defining traits: its exaltation of fame, its fascination with the military cultures of Greece and Rome, its emphasis on human dignity and freedom, its pursuit of secular knowledge in history and psychology, and its political commitment to improving the quality of institutional and personal life.’

Type
Studies
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , Spring 1992 , pp. 49 - 95
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Robert P. The Better Part of Valor: More Erasmus, Colet and Vives on Humanism, War and Peace, 1496-1535. Seattle, 1962.Google Scholar
Adelman, Janet. “ ‘Anger's My Meat’: Feeding, Dependency and Aggression in Coriolanus .” In Representing Shakespeare: New Psychoanalytic Essays, ed. Murray Schwartz and Coppelia Kahn, 129-50. Baltimore, 1980.Google Scholar
Aho, James A. Religious Mythology and the Art of War: Comparative Religious Symbolisms of Military Violence. Westport, CT, 1981.Google Scholar
Ashley, Maurice. England in the Seventeeth Century. Harmondsworth, 1975.Google Scholar
Baron, Hans. The Crisis of the Early Italian Renaissance. Princeton, NJ, 1966.Google Scholar
Barton, Ann. “Livy, Machiavelli, and Shakespeare's Coriolanus .” In William Shakespeare's Coriolanus, ed. Harold Bloom, 123-47. New York, 1988.Google Scholar
Bataillon, Marcel. Erasmo y Espana [1937]. Trans. Antonio Alatorre. Mexico City, 1983.Google Scholar
Best, Geoffrey. “Editor's Preface.” In War and Society in Renaissance Europe 1450-1620, 7-10. Baltimore, 1985.Google Scholar
Bevington, David. Tudor Drama and Politics. Cambridge, MA, 1968.Google Scholar
Brock, Peter. Pacifism in Europe to 1914. Princeton, NJ, 1972.Google Scholar
Bruckner, D. J., and Seymour, Chwast. Art Against War: Four Centuries of Anti-War Art. New York, 1984.Google Scholar
Cady, Duane. From Warism to Pacifism: A Moral Continuum. Philadelphia, 1989.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lily B. Shakespeare's “Histories“: Mirrors of Elizabethan Policy. San Marino, 1968.Google Scholar
Campbell, Oscar James. Comicall Satyre and Shakespeare's “Troilus and Cressida.” San Marino, 1970.Google Scholar
Chapiro, Jose. Erasmus and Our Struggle for Peace. Boston, 1950.Google Scholar
Council, Norman. When Honour's at the Stake: Ideas of Honour in Shakespeare's Plays. London, 1973.Google Scholar
Council, Norman. “Ben Jonson, Inigo Jones and the Transition of Tudor Chivalry.” English Literary History 472 (Summer 1980): 259-95.Google Scholar
Creel, Bryant. “Don Quixote,” Symbol of a Culture in Crisis. Valencia, 1987.Google Scholar
Crowson, P. S. Tudor Foreign Policy. New York, 1973.Google Scholar
Dollimore, Jonathan, and Alan, Sinfield. “History and Ideology: The Instance of Henry V. ” In Alternative Shakespeares, ed. John Drakakis, 206-27. London, 1985.Google Scholar
Dollimore, Jonathan, Radical Tragedy. 2d ed. London, 1989.Google Scholar
Dust, Phillip. Three Renaissance Pacifists: Essays in the Theories of Erasmus, More and Vives. American University Studies. New York, 1987.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius. The Complaint of Peace (Querela Pacis). In The Essential Erasmus, ed. John P. Dolan, 174–204. New York, 1964.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius. The Education of a Christian Prince. Trans. Lester K. Born. New York, 1965.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius. “Charon.” In The Colloquies of Erasmus, ed. Craig R. Thompson, 113-19. Chicago, 1965.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Arthur B. The Chivalric Tradition in Renaissance England. Washington, DC, 1986.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. Power/Knowledge. Ed. and trans. Colin Gordon. New York, 1980.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Jonathan. James I and the Politics of Literature. Baltimore, 1983.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen. “Invisible Bullets: Renaissance Authority and Its Subversion in Henry IV and Henry V. ” In Political Shakespeare: New Essays in Cultural Materialism, ed. Jonathan Dollimore and Alan Sinfield, 18-47. Ithaca, NY, 1985.Google Scholar
Gurr, Andrew. “Henry V and the Bees’ Commonwealth.” Shakespeare Survey 30 (1977): 61–72.Google Scholar
Hale, J. R. War and Society in Renaissance Europe 1450-1620. Baltimore, 1985.Google Scholar
Hale, J. R. “Sixteenth-Century Explanations of War and Violence.” Past and Present 51 (1971): 3–26.Google Scholar
Hawkes, Terence. That Shakespearian Rag: Essays on a Critical Process. London, 1986.Google Scholar
Hovey, Kenneth Alan. “Holy War and Civil Peace: George Herbert's Jacobean Politics.” Explorations in Renaissance Culture (1985), 112-19.Google Scholar
Howard, Michael. War in European History. Oxford, Eng., 1986.Google Scholar
Howard, Michael. War and the Liberal Conscience. New Brunswick, NJ, 1978.Google Scholar
Hutton, J. H. Themes of Peace in Renaissance Poetry. Ithaca, NY, 1984.Google Scholar
James, I. The Workes of the Most High and Mighty Prince. London, 1616.Google Scholar
Johnson, James Turner. The Quest for Peace: Three Moral Traditions in Western Cultural History. Princeton, NJ, 1987.Google Scholar
Jonson, Ben. Complete Works. Ed. C. H. Herford, Percy Simpson, and Evelyn Simpson. 11 vols. Oxford, Eng., 1925-1952.Google Scholar
Jorgensen, Paul. Shakespeare's Military World. Berkeley, 1956.Google Scholar
Knight, G. Wilson. The Sovereign Flower: On Shakespeare as the Poet of Royalism. London, 1958.Google Scholar
Knight, G. Wilson. This Sceptered Isle: Shakespeare's Message to England at War [1940]. Folcroft, PA, 1959.Google Scholar
Knight, G. Wilson. The Imperial Theme [1931]. London, 1961.Google Scholar
Lee, Miurice. James I and Henri IV: An Essay in English Foreign Policy, 1603-1610. Urbana, 1970.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolò. The Portable Machiavelli. Ed. Peter Bondanella and Mark Musa. New York, 1979.Google Scholar
Mallin, Eric. “The End of Troy: Elizabethan Dissolution in Shakespeare's Troilus and Cressida .” Ph.D. diss., Stanford University, 1986.Google Scholar
Marcus, Leah S. Puzzling Shakespeare: Local Reading and its Discontents. Berkeley, 1989.Google Scholar
Marlowe, Christopher. The Complete Plays. Ed. J. B. Steane. Harmondsworth, 1969.Google Scholar
McElwee, William. The Wisest Fool in Christendom: The Reign of King James I and VI. London, 1958.Google Scholar
Middleton, Thomas. “The Peacemaker.” In The Works of Thomas Middleton, ed. A. H. Bullen, 8: 310-46. London, 1886.Google Scholar
Montrose, Louis Adrian. “The Purpose of Playing: Reflections on a Shakespearean Anthropology.“Helios, n.s. 72(1980): 50-73.Google Scholar
More, Thomas. Utopia. Ed. Robert M. Adams. New York, 1975.Google Scholar
Neale, J. E. Queen Elizabeth I, a Biography. New York, 1934.Google Scholar
Rabkin, Norman. Shakespeare and the Problem of Meaning. Chicago, 1981.Google Scholar
Scarry, Elaine. The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World. New York, 1985.Google Scholar
Schoenbaum, Samuel. “Introduction.” In William Shakespeare, Henry VIII, xxii-xl. New York, 1989.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. As You Like It. Ed. Albert Gilman. New York, 1987.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Coriolanus. Ed. John Dover Wilson. Cambridge, Eng., 1969.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Cymbeline. Ed. James Nosworthy. London, 1972.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Hamlet. Ed. Edward Hubler. New York, 1987.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Henry V. Ed. Gary Taylor. New York, 1984.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Henry VIII. Ed. Stanley Schoenbaum. New York, 1989.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Othello. Ed. Alvin Kernan. New York, 1987.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Troilus and Cressida. Ed. Kenneth Muir. New York, 1984.Google Scholar
Swinne, Axel. Bibliographia Irenica 1500-1970. Hildesheim, 1977.Google Scholar
Taylor, Gary. “Introdurtion.” In William Shakespeare, Henry V, 1-75. New York, 1984.Google Scholar
Tennenhouse, Leonard. “Strategies of State and Political Plays: MND, HIV, HV, HVIII .” In Political Shakespeare, ed. Jonathan Dollimore and Alan Sinfield, 109-30. Ithaca, NY, 1985.Google Scholar
Tracy, James D. The Politics of Erasmus: A Pacifist Intellectual and his Political Milieu. Toronto, 1978.Google Scholar
Walch, Gunter. “ Henry V as Working-House of Ideology.” Shakespeare Survey 40 (1988): 63–69.Google Scholar
Wernham, Richard B. The Making of Elizabethan Foreign Policy, 1558-1603. Berkeley, 1980.Google Scholar
Wilson, Robert. The Cobler's Prophecie. Ed. A. C. Wood. Oxford, 1914.Google Scholar
Woodbridge, Linda. Women and the English Renaissance. Urbana, 1984.Google Scholar
Wright, Louis B. “Propaganda against James I's ‘Appeasement’ of Spain.” Huntington Library Quarterly VI (1942): 149-71.Google Scholar
Yates, Frances. Shakespeare's Last Plays: A New Approach. London. 1975.Google Scholar