Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:15:21.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Fringes of Center: Disputed Hagiographic Imagery and the Crisis over the Beati moderni in Rome ca. 1600*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Ruth S. Noyes
Ruth S. Noyes*
Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article sets forth, through a small collection of case studies, the extent to which the literal and pictorial figures of the Beati moderni constituted potentially provocative and disputed hermeneutical territory between particular religious constituencies, in this case the Oratorians and the Jesuits, and an increasingly stringent Curia ca. 1600. A reexamination of Beati moderni hagiographic imagery, and curial censorship of such imagery, potentially problematizes scholarly assumptions that these images served the Counter-Reformation Church's demands to control the meaning of religious images and the cult of the saints. Such reassessment calls for the reevaluation of a newly-constituted, uniquely post-Tridentine genre of hagiographic imagery: the Beati moderni devotional altar image and its reproductive printed devotional derivatives.

Type
Research Article
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 64 , Issue 3 , Fall 2011 , pp. 800 - 846
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Please see the online version of this article for color illustrations.

This article is indebted to the guidance and support of the anonymous readers; to Stephen Campbell, who assisted in all stages of writing; to Thomas Izbicki, who generously transcribed and translated Latin; and to Laura Blom, who provided invaluable help with the editing process. All translations are the author's except where otherwise noted; any errors of translation are the author's own.

References

Anfossi, Domenico. De sacrarum Reliquiarum Cultu, Veneratione, Translatione, atque Identitatae Brevis, sed utilis Tractatio, studio, et opera M. R. V. D. D. Dominici Anfossii Patritii Tabiensis, et Canonici Papiensis. Brescia, 1610.Google Scholar
Baglione, Giovanni. Le vite de’ pittori scultori et architetti. Rome, 1642.Google Scholar
Bailey, Gauvin Alexander. Between Renaissance and Baroque: Jesuit Art in Rome, 1565–1610. Toronto, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, B. “Aretino, the Public, and the Censorship of Michelangelo's Last Judgment.” In Suspended License (1997), 59–84.Google Scholar
Barocchi, P. Trattati d'arte del cinquecento . Fra manierismo e controriforma. 3 vols. Bari, 1961.Google Scholar
Beggiao, Diego. La visita pastorale di Clemente VIII (1592–1600): aspetti di riforma post-Tridentina a Roma. Rome, 1978.Google Scholar
Bellarmino, R. Disputationes de controversiis christianae fidei adversus huius temporis haereticos. 3 vols. Ingolstadt, 1586–93.Google Scholar
Bellarmino, R. Memorie autobiografiche (1613). Ed. , Giustiniani, P. Brescia, 1999.Google Scholar
Benedetto, XIV. De servorum Dei beatificatione et beatorum canonizatione. 2 vols. Prato, 1839.Google Scholar
Borromeo, Carlo. Instructionum fabricae et supellectilis ecclesiastica. Trans. , Marinelli, M. Milan, 2000.Google Scholar
Burke, P. “How To Be a Counter-Reformation Saint.” In Religion and Society in Early Modern Europe, 1500–1800, ed. , Greyerz, Kaspar von, 45–55. Boston, 1984.Google Scholar
Bury, M. The Print in Italy. London, 2001.Google Scholar
Celio, G. Memoria delli nomi dell'Artefici delle pitture che sono in alcune Chiese, Facciate, e Palazzi di Roma. Naples, 1638.Google Scholar
Creytens, R. “Le ‘Studium Romanae Curiae’ et le Maître du Sacré Palais.” Archivum Fratrum Praedicatorum 12 (1942): 5–83.Google Scholar
de Maio, R. “L'ideale eroico nei processi di canonizzazione della controriforma.”In de Maio, Riforme e miti nella Chiesa del Cinquecento, 257–78. Naples, 1973.Google Scholar
Ditchfield, Simon. “How Not To Be a Counter-Reformation Saint: The Attempted Canonization of Pope Gregory X, 1622–45.” Papers of the British School at Rome 60 (1992): 379–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ditchfield, Simon. Liturgy, Sanctity and History in Tridentine Italy: Pietro Maria Campi and the Preservation of the Particular. Cambridge, 1995.Google Scholar
Ditchfield, Simon. “Sanctity in Early Modern Italy.” Journal of Ecclesiastical History 47 (1996): 98–112.10.1017/S0022046900018662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ditchfield, Simon. “Tridentine Worship and the Cult of Saints.” In The Cambridge History of Christianity, vol. 6, Reform and Expansion, 1500–1600, ed. , Po-Chia Hsia, R., 201–24. Cambridge, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ditchfield, Simon. “Thinking with the Saints: Sanctity and Society in the Early Modern World.” Critical Inquiry 35.3 (2009): 552–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fragnito, G. “La censura libraria tra Congregazione dell'Indice, Congregazione dell'Inquisione e Maestro del Sacro Palazzo (1571–1596).” In La censura libraria nell'Europa del secolo XVI, ed. , Rozzo, U., 163–75. Udine, 1997.Google Scholar
Gallonio, Antonio. Monumenta. Biblioteca Vallicelliana, H.14.Google Scholar
Garrison, Edward B. Italian Romanesque Panel Painting: An Illustrated Index. Florence, 1949.Google Scholar
Gotor, Miguel. “La fabbrica dei santi: la riforma urbaniana e il modello tridentino.” In Storia d'Italia. Annali 16. Roma. La città del papa. Vita civile e religiosa dal Giubileo di Bonifacio VIII al Giubileo di Papa Wojtyla, ed. , Fiorani, Luigi and , Prosperi, Adriano, 677–727. Torino, 2000.Google Scholar
Gotor, Miguel. I Beati Del Papa: Santità, Inquisizione e Obbedienza in Età Moderna. Florence, 2002.Google Scholar
Hecht, Christian. Katholische Bildertheologie im Zeitalter von Gegenreformation und Barock: Studien zu Traktaten von Johannes Molanus, Gabriele Paleotti und anderen Autoren. Berlin, 1997.Google Scholar
Incisa della Rocchetta, Giovanni, Nello, Vian. Il Primo Processo Per San Filippo Nerinel Codice Vaticano Latino 3798 e in Altri Esemplari Dell'Archivio Dell'Oratorio Di Roma. 3 vols. Città del Vaticano, 1957.Google Scholar
Jedin, H. “Entstehung und Tragweite des trienter Dekrets über die Bilderverehrung.” Tübinger theologische Quartalschrift 116 (1935): 143–88, 404–29.Google Scholar
Kaplan, P. H. D. “Veronese and the Inquisition: The Geopolitical Context.” In Suspended License (1997), 85–124.Google Scholar
König-Nordhoff, Ursula. Ignatius von Lyola: Studien zur Entwicklung einer neuen Heiligen-Ikonographie im Rahem einer Kanonisationskampagne um 1600. Berlin, 1982.Google Scholar
Krüger, Klaus. “Authenticity and Fiction: On the Pictorial Construction of Inner Presence in Early Modern Italy.” In Image and Imagination of the Religious Self in Late Medieval and Early Modern Europe, ed. , Falkenburg, Reindert L., , Melion, Walter S., and , Richardson, Todd M., 37–69. Turnhout, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leuschner, Eckhard. “The Papal Printing Privilege.” Print Quarterly 15.4 (1998): 359–70.Google Scholar
Leuschner, Eckhard. “Censorship and the Market: Antonio Tempesta's ‘New’ Subjects in the Context of Roman Printmaking ca. 1600.” In The Art Market in Italy (15th–17th Centuries), ed. , Fantoni, Marcello and , Matthew, Louisa Chevalier, 65–74. Modena, 2003.Google Scholar
Leuschner, Eckhard. Antonio Tempesta: ein Bahnbrecher des römischen Barock und seine europäische Wirkung. Petersberg, 2005.Google Scholar
Levy, Evonne. Propaganda and the Jesuit Baroque. Berkley, 2004.10.1525/california/9780520233577.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Libro nel quale si notano le grazie et i Miracoli del beato Carlo Borromeo, cardinale di Santa Prassede arcivescovo di Milano, dalli ostiari ossia custodi del duomo di Milano deputati da monsignor vicario generale alla custodia del sepolcro del suddetto beato. In BAM, ms. Q 106. Milan, 1603.Google Scholar
Lincoln, Evylyn. The Invention of the Italian Renaissance Printmaker. New Haven, 2000.Google Scholar
Luchinat, C. Taddeo e Federico Zuccari. Fratelli pittori del Cinquecento. 2 vols. Milano, 1999.Google Scholar
Mancini, G. Considerazioni sulla pittura. Ed. , Marucchi, A. 2 vols. Rome, 1956–57.Google Scholar
Molanus, Jan. Traité des saintes images. Ed. , Christin, O., , Boespflug, F., and , Tassel, B.. Paris, 1996.Google Scholar
Mucanzio, Giovanni. Diarium.BAV, Barb. lat. 2810.Google Scholar
Noyes, Ruth. “‘A me toccano masticcare pillole amare’: Rubens, the Oratorians and the Crisis over the Beati moderni circa 1600: Towards a Revised Geography of the Catholic Reformation.” 2 vols. PhD diss., Johns Hopkins University, 2009.Google Scholar
Orbaan, J. A. F. Documenti sul Barocco in Roma. Rome, 1920.Google Scholar
Paleotti, Gabriele. Discorso intorno alle immagini sacre e profane. Bologna: Alessandro Benacci, 1582.Google Scholar
Paleotti, Gabriele. Discorso intorno alle immagini sacre e profane (1582). Ed. , Della Torre, S. Milan, 2002.Google Scholar
Giovanni, Papa. Le Cause Di Canonizzazione Nel Primo Periodo Della Congregazione Dei Riti: 1588–1634. Rome, 2001.Google Scholar
Papi, G. “Le tele della cappellina di Odoardo Farnese.” Storia dell'arte 62 (1988): 71–80.Google Scholar
Pecchiai, P. Il Gesù di Roma. Rome, 1952.Google Scholar
Prodi, Paolo. Il cardinale Gabriele Paleotti (1522–1597). 2 vols. Rome, 1959.Google Scholar
Quetif, J. Scriptores Ordinis Prædicatorum recensiti. New York, 1959–61.Google Scholar
Récalde, I de. Les Jésuites sous Aquaviva . . . D'après des documents inédits extraits des Archives du Vatican. Paris, 1927.Google Scholar
La regola e la fama. San Filippo Neri e l'Arte. Milan, 1995.Google Scholar
Reusch, H. Der Index der verbotenen Bücher. Ein Beitrag zur Kirchen- und Literatur-geschichte. 2 vols. Bonn, 1883, 1885.Google Scholar
Reusch, H., ed. Die Indices librorum prohibitorum des sechzehnten Jahrhunderts. Tübingen, 1886.Google Scholar
Rocca, Angelo. De canonizatine Sanctorum commentarius. Rome, 1601.Google Scholar
Sallmann, Jean-Michel. “Il santo e le rappresentazioni della santità: Problemi di metodo.” Quaderni storici 41 (1979): 584–602.Google Scholar
Schlitt, M. “Painting, Criticism, and Michelangelo's ‘Last Judgment’ in the Age of the Counter Reformation.” In Michelangelo's “Last Judgment,” ed. , Hall, M., 113–49. Cambridge, 2005.Google Scholar
Stoichita, Victor I. Visionary Experience in the Golden Age of Spanish Art. London, 1995.Google Scholar
Suspended License: Censorship and the Visual Arts. Ed. Childs, E. C. Seattle, 1997.Google Scholar
Tanner, Norman, ed. Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils. 2 vols. London, 1990.Google Scholar
Veraja, F. La beatificazione. Rome, 1983.Google Scholar
Witcombe, Christopher. “Christopher Plantin's Papal Privileges: Documents in the Vatican Archives.” De Gulden Passer 69 (1991): 133–45.Google Scholar
Witcombe, Christopher. Copyright in the Renaissance: Prints and the “Privilegio” in Sixteenth-Century Venice and Rome. Leiden, 2004.Google Scholar
Zazzara, Francesco. Diario. ACO, ms. A IV, 1–119.Google Scholar
Zazzara, Francesco. “Diario delle onoranze, a S. Filippo Neri dalla morte alla canonizzazione.” In Quaderni dell'Oratorio6 (n.d. [1962]): 1–28.Google Scholar
Zuccari, Alessandro. “Bellarmino e la prima iconografia Gesùitica: la cappella de gli Angeli al Gesù.” In Bellarmino e la Controriforma: Atti del simposio internazionale di studi Sora 15–18, Ottobre, 1986, ed. , De Maio, R, 609–28. Sora, 1990.Google Scholar