Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:19:48.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Mimesis of Marriage: Dialogue and Intimacy in Erasmus's Matrimonial Writings*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Reinier Leushuis
Reinier Leushuis*
Affiliation:
Florida State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Erasmus's writings on marriage, such as the Praise of Marriage, the Institution of Christian Marriage, and several of the Colloquies, have long been studied from a social-intellectual perspective that focuses on their role within theobgical debates of the time. This article proposes a different approach by stressing the literary and rhetorical aspects by which these texts seek to influence a reader in his or her "matrimonial praxis." Through the combination of an effective rhetoric of intimacy with the characteristics of literary dialogue, Erasmus creates a mimetic discourse aimed at conveying models of conjugal life to be imitated by future readers.

Type
Studies
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 57 , Issue 4 , Winter 2004 , pp. 1278 - 1307
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Earlier versions of this text were read at the Renaissance and Early Modem Colloquium at Princeton University (Spring 1998) and at die annual meeting of the Renaissance Society of America in Scottsdale, Arizona, 11-13 April 2002. I would like to thank Professors Jean-Claude Carron at UCLA and Eva Kushner at the University of Toronto (Victoria College) as well as the two anonymous readers for their meticulous readings and useful comments on my essay. Parts of my discussions of the colloquies and the Encomium in this article have been reworked from material published previously in French in my book Le Mariage et l'«amitié courtoise» dans le dialogue et le récit bref de la Renaissance (Florence 2003). Throughout the article the abbreviation ASD refers to the Opera Omnia Desiderii Erasmi Roterodami (Erasmus, 1969—); CWE to the Collected Works of Erasmus (Erasmus, 1974—); and LB to the Opera Omnia (Erasmus, 1703-06).

References

Baltensweiler, Heinrich. Die Ehe im neuen Testament. Exegetische Untersuchungen iiber die Ehe, Ehelosigkeit und Ehescheidung. Zurich, 1967.Google Scholar
Bateman, John. “From Soul to Soul: Persuasion in Erasmus’ Paraphrases on the New Testament.” Erasmus in English 15 (1988): 7-16.Google Scholar
The Bible: Authorized King James Version with Apocrypha. Oxford, 1997.Google Scholar
Bierlaire, Franz. Erasme et ses colloques: le livre d'une vie. Geneva, 1977.Google Scholar
Bierlaire, Franz. Les Colloques d'Erasme: reforme des etudes, reforme des mceurs et reforme de I'Eglise au XVIe siecle. Paris, 1978.Google Scholar
Carron, Jean-Claude. “The Persuasive Seduction: Dialogue in Sixteenth- Century France.” In Contending Kingdoms: Historical, Psychological, and Feminist Approaches to the Literature of Sixteenth-Century France and England, ed. Logan, Marie-Rose and Rudnytsky, Peter L., 90–108. Detroit, 1995.Google Scholar
Catholic Encyclopedia. Ed. Charles G. Herbermann et al. 16 vols. New York, 1907-14.Google Scholar
Chomarat, Jacques. Grammaire et rhetorique chez Erasme. 2 vols. Paris, 1981.Google Scholar
Colish, Marcia. Peter Lombard. 2 vols. New York, 1994.Google Scholar
Cox, Virginia. The Renaissance Dialogue: Literary dialogue in its social and political contexts, Castiglione to Galileo. Cambridge, 1992.Google Scholar
Defaux, Gerard. Marot, Rabelais, Montaigne: I'ecriture comme presence. Paris, 1987.Google Scholar
Delia Casa, Giovanni. Una questione piacevolissima: se si debba prender moglie. Galateo. Ed. and trans. A. Benedetto. Milan, 1992.Google Scholar
Dictionnaire de theologie catholique. Ed. A. Vacant, E. Mangenot, E. Amann et al. 15 vols. Paris, 1923-50.Google Scholar
Duby, Georges. “Le mariage dans la society du haut moyen age.” In II matrimonio nella societa altomedievale, 15-39. the Cradle: ErasmusGoogle Scholar
Eden, Kathy. “From the Cradle: Erasmus on Intimacy in Renaissance Letters.“ Erasmus of Rotterdam Society Yearbook 21 (2001a): 30–43.Google Scholar
Eden, Kathy. Friends Hold All Things Common: Tradition, Intellectual Property, and the Adages of Erasmus. New Haven and London, 2001b.Google Scholar
Enciclopedia Cattolica. 12 vols. Florence, 1949-54.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius. Opera Omnia. (LB: Lugdunum Batavorum). 10 vols. Ed. Jean Leclerc. Leiden, 1703-06.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius. Dilutio eorum quae Iodocus Clithoueus scripsit adversus declamationem Des. Erasmi Roterodami suasoriam matrimonii. Ed. Telle, Emile. Paris, 1968.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius. Opera Omnia Desiderii Erasmi Roterodami. (ASD: Amstelodami). Amsterdam, 1969 Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius. Collected Works of Erasmus. (CWE). Toronto, 1974 Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius. Esmein, Andre. Le Mariage en droit canonique. 1891. Reprint, New York, 1968.Google Scholar
Gaudemet, Jean. Le Mariage en Occident. Les moeurs et le droit. Paris, 1984.Google Scholar
Gutmann, Elsbeth. Die Colloquia Familiaria des Erasmus von Rotterdam. Basel and Stuttgart, 1968.Google Scholar
Harrington, Joel. Reordering Marriage and Society in Reformation Germany. Cambridge, 1995.Google Scholar
Heath, Michael. “Erasmus and the Laws of Marriage.” In Acta conventus neolatini hafniensis, ed. Rhoda Schnur, 477-84. Binghamton, 1994.Google Scholar
Henderson, Judith Rice. “On Reading the Rhetoric of the Renaissance Letter.“ In Renaissance-Rhetorik Renaissance Rhetoric, ed. Plett, Heinrich, 143-62. Berlin and New York, 1993.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Manfred. Rhetoric and Theology: The Hermeutics of Erasmus. Toronto, 1994.Google Scholar
Hyma, Albert. “Erasmus and the Sacrament of Matrimony.” Archiv fur Reformationsgeschichte 48 (1957): 145- 64. Justinian. Justinian's Institutes. Ed. P. Krueger. Trans. P. Birks and G. McLeod. London, 1987.Google Scholar
Kohls, Ernst-Wilhelm. Die Theologie des Erasmus. Basel, 1966.Google Scholar
Kushner, Eva. “Reflexions sur le dialogue en France au XVT si£cle.” Revue des Sciences Humaines 148 (1972): 485– 501.Google Scholar
Kushner, Eva. “Les Colloques et l'inscription de l'autre dans le discours.” In Dix conferences sur Erasme. Eloge de la folic — Colloques, ed. Blum, Claude, 33–47. Paris and Geneva, 1988.Google Scholar
Kushner, Eva. “The Renaissance Dialogue and Its Zero-Degree Fictionality.” In Fiction Updated: Theories of Fictionality, Narratology, and Poetics, ed. Calin- Andrei Mihailescu and Walid Hamarneh, 165-72. Toronto, 1996.Google Scholar
Lazzeri, Anna Maria, and Menchi, Silvana Seidel. “'Evidentemente gravida': 'Fides oculata,’ voce pubblica e matrimonio controverso in Valsugana (1539-44).” In Matrimoni in dubbio (2001), 305-27.Google Scholar
Leushuis, Reinier. Le Mariage et I'amitie courtoise dans le dialogue et le recit bref de la Renaissance. Florence, 2003.Google Scholar
Margolin, Jean-Claude. Introduction to Erasmus's Encomium matrimonii. In Opera Omnia Desiderii Erasmi Roterodami, vol. 1-5 (1975), 333-82.Google Scholar
Margolin, Jean-Claude. “L'art du dialogue et de la mise en scene dans le Julius Exclusus.” In Le Dialogue au temps de la Renaissance, ed. M. T. Jones-Davies, 213-35. Paris, 1984.Google Scholar
Margolin, Jean-Claude “La conception 6rasmienne du veuvage et du remariage.” Rinascimento 39 (1999): 37–66.Google Scholar
Marsh, David. The Quattrocento Dialogue: Classical Tradition and Humanist Invention. Cambridge, MA and London, 1980. Matrimoni in dubbio: Unioni controverse e nozze clandestine in Italia dal XIV al XVIII secolo. Ed. Menchi, Silvana Seidel and Quaglioni, Diego. Bologna, 2001.Google Scholar
Menchi, Silvana Seidel. “Percorsi variegati, percorsi obbligati: Elogio del matrimonio pre-tridentino.” In Matrimoni in dubbio (2001), 17-60.Google Scholar
Morrison, Karl. The Mimetic Tradition of Reform in the West. Princeton, 1982.Google Scholar
Payne, John. Erasmus: His Theology of the Sacraments. Richmond, VA, 1969.Google Scholar
Reese, Arnold. “Learning Virginity: Erasmus' Ideal of Christian Marriage.“ Bibliotheque d'Humanisme et Renaissance 57 (1995): 551-67.Google Scholar
Ricceur, Paul. Time and Narrative. Trans. McLaughlin, Kathleen and Pellauer, David. 3 vols. Chicago, 1984.Google Scholar
Rummel, Erika. Erasmus on Women. Toronto, 1996.Google Scholar
Telle, Emile. Erasme de Rotterdam et le septiime sacrement: Etude d'evangelisme matrimonial au XVT siecle et contribution a la biographic intellectuelle d'Erasme. Geneva, 1954.Google Scholar
Van der Poel, Marc. De declamatio bij de humanisten: Bijdrage tot de studie van de functies van de rhetorica in de Renaissance. Nieuwkoop, 1987.Google Scholar