Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T05:09:10.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Margaret Cavendish and the Romance of Contract*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Victoria Kahn
Victoria Kahn*
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

All things by war are in a Chaos hurl'd

But love alone first made,

And still preserves the world.

— Alexander Brome

I have heard [William Cavendish] say several times, that his love to his gracious master King Charles the Second was above the love he bore to his wife, children, and all his posterity, nay, to his own life: and when, since his return into England, I answered him that I observed his gracious master did not love him so well as he loved him; he replied, that he cared not whether his Majesty loved him again or not; for he was resolved to love him.

— The Life of William, Duke of Newcastle

Type
Studies
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , Summer 1997 , pp. 526 - 566
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This essay is part of a book-length project entitled The Romance of Contract: Literature and Politics in England, 1640-74. Among the many colleagues who have commented on this essay, I am particularly grateful to Helene Silverberg for her suggestions for revision, to Kevin Sharpe and an anonymous reader for Renaissance Quarterly for their extraordinarily helpful reader's reports, and to Neil Saccamano for conversations about Cavendish.

References

Armstrong, Nancy. Desire and Domestic Fiction. Oxford, 1985.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M.M. The Dialogic Imagination. Ed. Holquist, Michael. Trans. Emerson, Caryl and Holquist, Michael. Austin, 1981.Google Scholar
Boscohel: or The History of His Sacred Majesties Most Miraculous Preservation after the Battle of Worcester 3 Sept. 1651. London, 1660.Google Scholar
Butler, Martin. Theatre and Crisis,1632-42. Cambridge, 1984.Google Scholar
Cavendish, Margaret. Plays written by the thrice Noble… Lady Marchioness of Newcastle. London, 1662.Google Scholar
Cavendish, Margaret. Philosophical Letters. London, 1664 1.Google Scholar
Cavendish, Margaret. CCX7 Sociable Letters. London, 1664 2.Google Scholar
Cavendish, Margaret. Natures Pictures drawn by Fancies Pencil to the Life. London, 1656.Google Scholar
Cavendish, Margaret. The Description of the New Blazing World and other writings. Ed. Lilley, Kate. Washington Square, NY, 1992.Google Scholar
Cavendish, Margaret. The Life of William, Duke of Newcastle. 2d ed., ed. Firth, C.H.. London, n.d.Google Scholar
Corns, Thomas. Uncloistered Virtue: English Political Literature, 1640-1660. Oxford, 1992.Google Scholar
Crane, Mary Thomas. Framing Authority: Sayings, Self, and Societyin Sixteenth-Century England. Princeton, 1993.Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry. The Ideology of the Aesthetic. Cambridge, MA, 1990.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. Public Man, Private Woman: Woman in Socialand Political Thought. Princeton, 1981.Google Scholar
Fanshawe, Richard, trans. Il Pastor Fido or the Faithful Shepherd. London, 1647.Google Scholar
Filmer, Robert. Patriarcha and Other Writings. Ed. Sommerville, Johann P.. Cambridge, 1991.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. The History of Sexuality. Vol. 1: An Introduction. Trans. Hurley, Robert. New York, 1980 1.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. Power/Knowledge. Ed. Gordon, Colin. New York, 1980 2.Google Scholar
Frye, Northrop. The Anatomy of Criticism. Princeton, 1957.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Catherine. “Embracing the Absolute: The Politics of the Female Subject in Seventeenth-Century England.” Genre 1(1988): 24–39.Google Scholar
Gierke, Otto. Natural Law and the Theory of Society. Trans. Barker, Ernest. Cambridge, 1934; 1950.Google Scholar
Gough, J.W. The Social Contract: A Critical Study of its Development. 2d ed. Oxford, 1957.Google Scholar
Grant, Douglas. Margaret the First: A Biography of Margaret Cavendish, Duchess of Newcastle. Toronto, 1957.Google Scholar
Gunn, J.A.W. Politics and the Public Interest in the Seventeenth Century. London, 1969.Google Scholar
Haller, William. Tracts on Liberty inthe Puritan Revolution, 1638-1647. 3 vols. New York, 1934.Google Scholar
Herzog, Don. Happy Slaves: A Critique of Consent Theory. Chicago, 1989.Google Scholar
Hill, Christopher. Society and Puritanism. London, 1964.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. The Passions and the Interests. Princeton, 1977.Google Scholar
Hirst, Derek. “The Politics of Literature in the English Republic.” The Seventeenth Century 5 (1990):133-55.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. Ed. Macpherson, C.B.. Harmondsworth, 1975.Google Scholar
Höpfl, Harro and Thompson, Martyn P.. “The History of Contract as a Motif in Political Thought.” American Historical Review 84(1979): 919–44.Google Scholar
Houlbrooke, Ralph A. The English Family, 1450-1700. London and New York, 1984.Google Scholar
Hughes, Christopher. Romance, Probability, and Politics in England, 1650-1720. PhD. diss., Princeton University, 1995.Google Scholar
Hume, David. “Of the Original Contract.” In Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary, ed. Green, T.H. and Grose, T.H., 2:443-60. London, 1875.Google Scholar
Ingram, Martin. Church Courts, Sex and Marriage in England, 1570-1640. Cambridge and New York, 1987.Google Scholar
Iwanisziw, Susan B. The Place of Women in Early Modern English Closet Drama. Ph.D. diss, University of Pennsylvania, 1994.Google Scholar
Jonsen, Albert R. and Toulmin, Stephen. The Abuse of Casuistry. Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1988.Google Scholar
Ben, Jonson. Selected Masques. Ed. Orgel, Stephen. New Haven and London, 1970.Google Scholar
Jordan, Constance. Renaissance Feminism. Ithaca and London, 1990.Google Scholar
Leites, Edmund. “Casuistry and Character.” In Conscience and Casuistry in Early Modern Europe, ed. Leites, Edmund, 119-33. Cambridge and Paris, 1988.Google Scholar
Leslie, Marina. “Evading Rape and Embracing Empire in Margaret Cavendish's Assaulted and Pursued Chastity ” In Menacing Virgins: Representing Virginity in the Middle Ages and Renaissance, ed. Kelly, Kathleen Coyne and Leslie, Marina. Newark, DE, forthcoming.Google Scholar
McKeon, Michael. The Origins of the English Novel, 1600-1740. Baltimore, 1987.Google Scholar
Mendelson, Sara Heller. The Mental World of Stuart Women. Brighton, 1987.Google Scholar
Miller, Peter. “Statecraft and Culture in Early Modern Europe.” The Historical Journal 38 (1995): 161–73.Google Scholar
Milton, John. Complete Poems and Major Prose. Ed. Hughes, Merritt Y.. Indianapolis, 1957.Google Scholar
Milton, John. The Doctrine and Discipline of Divorce. In Complete Prose of John Milton, vol. 2, ed. Sirluck, Ernest. 8 vols. New Haven, 1959.Google Scholar
Norbrook, David. Poetry and Politics in the English Renaissance. London and Boston, 1984.Google Scholar
Parker, Henry. Jus Populi. London, 1644.Google Scholar
Parker, Patricia A. Inescapable Romance: Studies in the Poetics of a Mode. Princeton, 1979.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. The Sexual Contract. Stanford, 1988.Google Scholar
Patterson, Annabel M. “ Paradise Regained: A Last Chance at True Romance.” Milton Studies 17(1983): 187–208.Google Scholar
Patterson, Annabel M. Censorship and Interpretation. Madison, 1984.Google Scholar
Potter, Lois. Secret Rites and Secret Writing: Royalist Literature, 1641-1660. Cambridge, 1989.Google Scholar
Rogers, John. The Matter of Revolution: Science, Poetry and Politics in the Age of Milton. Ithaca and London, 1996.Google Scholar
Saccamano, Neil. “Rhetoric, Consensus,and the Law in Rousseau's Contrat Social .” Modern Language Notes 107 (1992): 730-51.Google Scholar
Salzman, Paul. English Prose Fiction, 1558-1700. Oxford, 1984.Google Scholar
Sandy, Amelia. Secret Agents: Politic Ideology and Jacobean Romance. Ph.D. diss., Princeton University, 1997.Google Scholar
Scudery, Madeleine de. Ibrahim. Trans. Cogan, Henry. London, 1652.Google Scholar
Shanley, Mary Lyndon. “Marriage Contract and the Social Contract in Seventeenth-Century English Political Thought.” Western Political Quarterly 32 (1979): 79–91.Google Scholar
Sharpe, Kevin. Criticism and Compliment: The Politics of Literature in the England of Charles I. Cambridge, 1987.Google Scholar
Sharpe, Kevin. Politics and Ideas in Early Stuart England. London and NewYork, 1989.Google Scholar
Skerpan, Elizabeth. The Rhetoric of Politics in the English Revolution, 1642-1660. Columbia, MO, 1992.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. “Conquest and Consent: Thomas Hobbes and the Engagement Controversy.” In The Interregnum: The Quest for Settlement, ed. Aylmer, G.E., 79–98. New York, 1972.Google Scholar
Smith, Nigel. Literature and Revolution in England, 1640-1660. New Haven and London, 1994.Google Scholar
Spenser, Edmund. The Faerie Queene. In Spenser's Poetical Works, ed. Smith, J.C. and de Selincourt, E.. Oxford, 1924.Google Scholar
Spingarn, J.E. Critical Essays of the Seventeenth Century. 3 vols. Oxford, 1906. rpt. 1957.Google Scholar
Starr, George. Defoe and Casuistry. Princeton, 1971.Google Scholar
Swinburne, Henry. A Treatise of Spousals, or Matrimonial Contracts: wherein all the Questions relating to that Subject are ingeniously Debated and Resolved. London, 1686. Facs. rpt. in Marriage, Sex, and the Family in England 1660-1800, vol. 3, ed. Trumbach, Randolph. 44 vols. New York and London, 1985.Google Scholar
Thomas, Keith. “Cases of Conscience in Seventeenth-Century England.” In Public Duty and Private Conscience in Seventeenth-Century England, ed. Morrill, John, Slack, Paul, and Wolff, Daniel, 29–56. Oxford, 1993.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. Philosophy and Government, 1572-1651. Cambridge, 1993.Google Scholar
Tully, James. “Governing Conduct.” In Conscience and Casuistry in Early Modern Europe, ed. Leites, Edmund, 12–71. Cambridge and Paris, 1988.Google Scholar
Veevers, Erica. Images of Love and Religion: Queen Henrietta Mariaand Court Entertainments. Cambridge, 1989.Google Scholar
Wallace, John M. “The Engagement Controversy, 1649-1652: An Annotated List of Pamphlets.” Bulletin of the New York Public Library 68 (1964): 384–405.Google Scholar
Wallace, John M. Destiny His Choice: The Loyalism of Andrew Marvell. Cambridge, 1968.Google Scholar
Wilson, Katherina M. and Warnke, Frank. Women Writers of the Seventeenth Century. Athens, GA, 1989.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon. Hobhes and the Epic Tradition of Political Theory. Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1970.Google Scholar
Worden, Blair. “Classical Republicanismand the Puritan Revolution.” In History and Imagination: Essays in Honor of H.R. Trevor-Roper, ed. Lloyd-Jones, Hugh, Pearl, Valerie, and Worden, Blair, 182–200. New York, 1981.Google Scholar
Worden, Blair “Milton's Republicanism and the Tyranny of Heaven.” In Machiavelli and Republicanism, ed. Bock, Gisela, Skinner, Quentin, and Viroli, Maurizio, 225-46. Cambridge, 1990.Google Scholar