Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T23:02:10.959Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The very idea of design: what God couldn't do

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2004

RICHARD D. KORTUM
RICHARD D. KORTUM
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy and Humanities, East Tennessee State University, Box 70656, Johnson City, TE 37614-0656
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper argues for the proposition that there is fundamental incoherence in the idea of a divine designer. Such a being would have to have intentions and thoughts prior to designing and making a world. But it is a necessary truth that thought – of the complex and articulated kind necessary for the design of a cosmos – presupposes possession of language. It is further necessarily true that language is impossible, save for beings who inhabit a public world containing other linguistic subjects. The divine designer would be the impossible exemplar of the private language, whose incoherence was demonstrated by Wittgenstein. Objections to this line of argument are noted and rebutted.

Even God can't whisper in His own ear.Isaak Babel

Type
Research Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , March 2004 , pp. 81 - 96
Copyright
2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)