Article contents
The Significance of Process Theology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 October 2008
Extract
Process theology is far less prominent in Britain than in its country of origin, but its central doctrine of a developing God would prove, I think, to be held by many British theologians if one made enquiry. Professor Keith Ward may show which way the wind is blowing when he writes in his recent book Rational Theology and the Creativity of God: ‘only if God is temporal, can he be the free creator of a universe of free creatures; only if he is eternal, can he possess that necessity which is the foundation of the world; only if he is dipolar, can he be both’. To that extent he accepts the Whitehead-Hartshorne position. Why has the the absolute timelessness of God seemed obvious so regularly to thinking religious people down the ages? It must be, I shall say, that they have felt themselves in touch somehow with another world, or rather another state, in which time is absolutely transcended. But I am not concerned only with that in this article. My business is to suggest that process theology is important for a number of reasons. I shall return to Ward's book at the end.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983
References
page 311 note 1 (Basil Blackwell, 1982), p. 230.
page 311 note 2 Vol. 18, no. 2.
page 313 note 1 Published in the U.S.A. by Westminster Press (1976) and in the U.K. by Christian Journals Limited, Belfast (1977).
page 314 note 1 P. 26.
page 314 note 2 Pp. 44–5.
page 315 note 1 P. 46.
page 315 note 2 Pp. 47–8.
page 316 note 1 St Thomas and the Problem of Evil (Marquette University Press, Milwaukee).Google Scholar
page 316 note 2 In Cahier XXIV of Nouvelle Journée.
page 317 note 1 P. 124.
page 317 note 2 July 1982.
page 317 note 3 Cobb and Griffin, op. cit. p. 65.Google Scholar
page 317 note 4 P. 31.
page 317 note 5 P. 34.
page 317 note 6 P. 36.
page 317 note 7 Science and the Modern World. p. 234.Google Scholar
page 318 note 1 Aquinas to Whitehead – Seven Centuries of Metaphysics of Religion, the Aquinas Lecture, 1976 (Marquette University Press, Milwaukee), p. 19.Google Scholar
page 318 note 2 An Essay in Christian Philosophy (Longman, 1954), p. 93. Here I consider St Thomas's attempt to justify his position.Google Scholar
page 319 note 1 Hartshorne, , op. cit. p. 11.Google Scholar
page 319 note 2 Op. cit. p. 13.Google Scholar
page 319 note 3 The Marriage of East and West (Collins, 1982), p. 178.Google Scholar
page 320 note 1 Religion (O.U.P. and Collins, Fontana), p. 98.Google Scholar
page 320 note 2 P. 141.
page 320 note 3 Rational Theology and the Creativity of God, p. 229.Google Scholar
page 320 note 4 P. 231.
page 320 note 5 P. 73.
page 320 note 6 P. 3.
page 321 note 1 P. 154.
page 321 note 2 P. 217.
page 321 note 3 P. 163.
page 321 note 4 P. 160.
page 322 note 1 P. 199.
page 322 note 2 P. 86.
page 322 note 3 See Bouyer, L., Le Consolateur (Les Editions du Cerf, Paris, 1980), p. 268.Google Scholar
page 322 note 4 Further information can be found in Lane, Dermot A., The Experience of God-An Invitation to do Theology (Paulist Press, New York and Veritas Publications, Dublin).Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by