Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T19:25:14.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Schellenberg on propositional faith

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2013

DANIEL HOWARD-SNYDER
DANIEL HOWARD-SNYDER*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Western Washington University, 515 High Street, Bellingham, WA 98225, USA e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article assesses J. L. Schellenberg's account of propositional faith and, in light of that assessment, sketches an alternative that avoids certain objections and coheres better with Schellenberg's aims.

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 49 , Special Issue 2: Critical Essays on J. L. Schellenberg's Philosophy of Religion , June 2013 , pp. 181 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chignell, Andrew (2013) ‘Prolegomena to any future non-doxastic religion’, Religious Studies, doi:10.1017/S0034412513000073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard-Snyder, Daniel (unpublished) ‘Propositional faith’.Google Scholar
Schellenberg, J. L. (2005) Prolegomena to a Philosophy of Religion (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Schellenberg, J. L.(2007) The Wisdom to Doubt: A Justification of Religious Skepticism (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Schellenberg, J. L.(2009) The Will to Imagine: A Justification of Skeptical Religion (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Schellenberg, J. L.(2013) ‘Replies to my colleagues’, Religious Studies, doi:10.1017/S0034412513000127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wainwright, William (1994) ‘Skepticism, romanticism, and faith’, in Morris, T. (ed) God and the Philosophers (New York: Oxford University Press), 77–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar