Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:07:37.100Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Scepticism about the argument from divine hiddenness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2011

JUSTIN P. MCBRAYER  and
PHILIP SWENSON
JUSTIN P. MCBRAYER*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Fort Lewis College, Durango, CO 81301, USA
PHILIP SWENSON*
Affiliation:
University of California-Riverside, HMNSS Building, Room 1604, 900 University Avenue, Riverside, CA 92521, USA
*
e-mail: [email protected]
e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Some philosophers have argued that the paucity of evidence for theism – along with basic assumptions about God's nature – is ipso facto evidence for atheism. The resulting argument has come to be known as the argument from divine hiddenness. Theists have challenged both the major and minor premises of the argument by offering defences. However, all of the major, contemporary defences are failures. What unites these failures is instructive: each is implausible given other commitments shared by everyone in the debate or by theists in particular. Only challenges which are plausible given both common sense and other theistic commitments will undermine the argument from divine hiddenness. Given that such defences universally fail, the best hope for a successful challenge to the argument comes from more general sceptical responses. This sort of response is briefly sketched and defended against four independent objections.

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , June 2012 , pp. 129 - 150
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Craig, William (1995) ‘Politically incorrect salvation’, in Phillips, T. P. and Ockholm, D. (eds) Christian Apologetics in the Post-modern World (Downer's Grove IL: Inter-Varsity Press), 75–97.Google Scholar
Drange, Theodore M. (1998) ‘Nonbelief vs. lack of evidence: two atheistic arguments’, Philo, 1, 105–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flint, Thomas (1998) Divine Providence: The Molinist Account (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Foley, Richard (1993) Working without a Net: A Study of Egocentric Epistemology (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Hasker, William (1998) God, Time, and Knowledge (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, Douglas V. (2008) ‘Reasonable doubts about reasonable nonbelief’, Faith and Philosophy, 25, 276–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hick, John (1971) Arguments for the Existence of God (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
Howard-Snyder, Daniel (1996) ‘The argument from divine hiddenness’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 26, 433–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hick, John (2002) ‘Introduction: the hiddenness of God’, in Howard-Snyder, Daniel and Moser, Paul K. (eds) Divine Hiddenness: New Essays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 1–23.Google Scholar
Hume, David (2007) Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Peter Millican (ed.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Keller, James A. (1995) ‘The hiddenness of God and the problem of evil’, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 37, 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehe, Robert T. (2004) ‘A response to the argument from the reasonableness of non-belief’, Faith and Philosophy, 21, 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maitzen, Stephen (2006) ‘Divine hiddenness and the demographics of theism’, Religious Studies, 42, 177–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBrayer, Justin (2006) ‘On “A Molinist-style response to Schellenberg” by Michael Thune’, Southwest Philosophy Review, 22, 71–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBrayer, Justin (2010) ‘Skeptical theism’, Philosophy Compass, 5, 611–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKim, Robert (1990) ‘The hiddenness of God’, Religious Studies, 26, 141–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKim, Robert (2001) Religious Ambiguity and Religious Diversity (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Thomas V. (1992) ‘The hidden God’, in Making Sense of it All (Grand Rapids MI: Eerdmans), 85–108.Google Scholar
Moser, Paul K. (2001) ‘A god who hides and seeks’, Philosophia Christi, 2, 467–473.Google Scholar
Moser, Paul K. (2004) ‘Does divine hiddenness justify atheism? Divine hiddenness does not justify atheism’, in Peterson, Michael (ed.) Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion (Malden MA: Blackwell Publishing), 42–54.Google Scholar
Murray, Michael (1993) ‘Coercion and the hiddenness of God’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 30, 27–38.Google Scholar
Murray, Michael (2002): ‘Deus absconditus’, in Howard-Snyder, Daniel and Moser, Paul K. (eds) Divine Hiddenness: New Essays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 62–82.Google Scholar
Pascal, Blaise (1995) Pensées and Other Writings, trans. Honor Levi (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin (2000) Warranted Christian Belief (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Gideon (2008) ‘Kleinbart the oblivious and other tales of ignorance and responsibility’, Journal of Philosophy, 105, 591–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schellenberg, J. L. (1993) Divine Hiddenness and Human Reason (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Schellenberg, J. L. (1996) ‘Response to Howard-Snyder’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 26, 455–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schellenberg, J. L. (2005a) ‘The hiddenness argument revisited (I)’, Religious Studies, 41, 287–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schellenberg, J. L. (2005b) ‘The hiddenness argument revisited (II)’, Religious Studies, 41, 287–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schellenberg, J. L. (2007) The Wisdom to Doubt (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Swinburne, Richard (2004) The Existence of God (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talbot, Mark R. (1989) ‘Is it natural to believe in God?’, Faith and Philosophy, 6, 155–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thune, Michael (2006) ‘A Molinist-style response to Schellenberg’, Southwest Philosophy Review, 22, 33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Inwagen, Peter (2006) ‘The Hiddenness of God’, in The Problem of Evil (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 135–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wielenberg, Erik (2010) ‘Skeptical theism and divine lies’, Religious Studies, 46, 509–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar