Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:50:06.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response to Helm, Quinn, and Westphal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2001

NICHOLAS WOLTERSTORFF
NICHOLAS WOLTERSTORFF
Affiliation:
Yale University Divinity School, 409 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT 06511
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Before beginning my response, let me express the honour I feel in having these three friends and distinguished philosophical colleagues comment so thoughtfully on my ideas in Divine Discourse. I warmly thank them for their ‘labours’.

I propose mirroring the general structure of the book itself in my response. First, I'll consider what Helm says about my delineation of the topic, second, what Quinn says about my discussion of God speaking; third, what Westphal says about my discussion of interpreting for God's speech; and last, what Quinn says about my discussion of the epistemology of believing that God speaks.

Type
Reply
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , September 2001 , pp. 293 - 306
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)