Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:41:58.857Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The ‘radically empiricist’ interpretation of early Buddhist Nirvāṇa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Gary Doore
Affiliation:
University of Hawaii

Extract

In a recent book on the historical development of Buddhist thought, the author, David J. Kalupahana, has presented the thesis that early Buddhist philosophy, as found in the Pali Nikāyas and Chinese Āgamas, is radically different from that of later Buddhism, and supports his claim by tracing the historical divergence of the later schools from original Buddhism as he reconstructs it. He then goes on to assert that not only does early Buddhism differ philosophically from the later schools, but also that even the spiritual goal of nirvāna was fundamentally different, i.e., that the experience or condition denoted by the term ‘nirvāna’ in early Buddhism is quite different from that state which the same term came to denote later – a theory which is perhaps the most controversial feature ofhis overall interpretation of Buddhism.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 65 note 1 Buddhist Philosophy: A Historical Analysis (Honolulu: The University Press of Hawaii, 1976).Google Scholar

page 67 note 1 This is the phrase used by Kalupahana in a lecture given in December 1976 at the University of Hawaii (not used in the book) to further characterize this trance.