Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:16:48.512Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The possibilities of Incarnation: some radical Molinist suggestions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2001

THOMAS P. FLINT
THOMAS P. FLINT
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The traditional doctrine of the Incarnation maintains that God became man. But was it necessary that God become the particular man He in fact became? Could some man or woman other than the man born in Bethlehem roughly two thousand years ago have been assumed by the Son to effect our salvation? This essay addresses such questions from the perspective of one embracing Molina's picture of divine providence. After showing how Molina thought his theory of middle knowledge helps alleviate a traditional Christological puzzle, the essay turns to the aforementioned questions concerning God's incarnational alternatives and suggests some fairly radical answers. Finally, the essay presents two substantial objections to these radical answers and argues that these objections fail.

Type
Research Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , September 2001 , pp. 307 - 320
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)