Article contents
The No-Minimum argument and satisficing: a reply to Chris Dragos
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 November 2013
Abstract
Chris Dragos has recently presented two objections to criticisms I've published against Peter van Inwagen's No-Minimum argument. He also suggests that the best way to criticize the No-Minimum argument is via the concept of divine satisficing. In this article I argue that both of Dragos's objections fail, and I question whether satisficing is relevant to the viability of the No-Minimum argument.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013
References
- 1
- Cited by