Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:23:07.652Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New design arguments: old Millian objections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2000

DAVID B. MYERS
DAVID B. MYERS
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Moorhead State University, Moorhead, MN 56563
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An increasing number of natural scientists are doubling as natural theologians. I critically examine two recent defences of the design argument by biologists: Darwin's Black Box by Michael Behe and Nature's Destiny by Michael Denton. Each claims that recent findings in biology provide new evidence for belief in a supernatural designer. For the sake of argument, I grant both the validity and soundness of their arguments. What I then try to show is that even if we grant that the new biology supports a supernatural designer, J. S. Mill's objections, based on ordinary observation, still make it reasonable to doubt that the designer is the God of traditional theism – a being infinite in power, knowledge, and goodness.

Type
Research Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , June 2000 , pp. 141 - 162
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)