Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 October 2008
‘Open-minded’, ‘detached’, ‘objective’, ‘disinterested’, ‘impartial’, ‘non-partisan’ and ‘independent’ are terms typically used when Religious Studies seeks to present itself as an academic discipline. Phrases like ‘methodological agnosticism’, ‘suspension of judgement’, and ‘procedural neutrality’ are also found, in attempts to formulate an appropriate methodology. Seldom are those terms and phrases precisely defined, or the differences between them examined. Yet a moment's reflection reveals that they are far from clear or unambiguous, and that if they are to be used at all effectively in this context, more work must be done by way of preliminary analysis and clarification.
1 In formulating that definition I have taken note of the useful but inconclusive debate between Alan Montefiore and Kolakowski, Leszek in Neutrality and Impartiality, ed. by Montefiore, Alan (Cambridge University Press, 1975).Google Scholar
2 ‘The Theological Enemies of Religious Studies’ Religion, XVIII (1988), 31.Google Scholar
3 Comparative Religion (Newton Abbot, 1972), p. 30.Google Scholar
4 Encyclopedia of Religion, vol. 1 (Macmillan, 1987), pp. ix–xx.Google Scholar
5 See King, Ursula, ‘Female Identity and the History of Religions’, in Identity Issues and World Religions, ed. by Hayes, Victor C., (Australian Association for the Study of Religions, 1986), pp. 83–92.Google Scholar
6 Encyclopedia of Religion, vol. 1, p. xv.Google Scholar
7 Clarendon Press, 1968, p. 10.Google Scholar
8 Penguin, 1970, p. 16.Google Scholar
9 ‘The Theory of Religion and Method in the Study of Religion in the Encyclopedia of Religion’, Religious Studies, XXIV (1988), 9.Google Scholar
10 Ibid. p. 10.
11 ‘A Positive Episteme for the Study of Religion’, Scottish journal of Religious Studies, VI (1985), 78.Google Scholar
12 Ibid. p. 90.
13 Comparative Religion, 2nd ed. (Duckworth, 1986), p. 295.Google Scholar
14 ‘Postulations for Safeguarding Preconceptions: The Case of the Scientific Religionist’, Religion XVIII (1988), 18.Google Scholar
15 In On the Margins of Science, ed. by Wallis, Roy (University of Keele, 1979), p. 197.Google Scholar