Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:32:06.654Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Misuse of Anselm's Formula for God's Perfection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Leon Pearl
Leon Pearl
Affiliation:
Hofstra University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Recently there have been a number of attempts at showing that God's attributes are conceptually defective (Kretzman, Mackie). Foremost among the attributes singled out for criticism is omnipotence. But critics have also questioned the logical compatibility of omniscience and immutability and also omnipotence and omniscience.

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 22 , Issue 3-4 , September 1986 , pp. 355 - 365
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 355 note 1 ‘Divine Perfection’, Religious Studies, XXI 2 (1985), 144–58.Google Scholar

page 355 note 2 Ibid. p. 147.

page 356 note 1 Ibid. p. 156.

page 356 note 2 Ibid. p. 156.

page 356 note 3 Ibid. p. 156.

page 357 note 1 Ibid. pp. 157–8.

page 357 note 2 Ibid. p. 158.

page 357 note 3 Ibid. p. 147.

page 358 note 1 Ibid. p. 158.

page 362 note 1 Swinburne, R. G., ‘Duty and the Will of God’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, IV, 2 (12. 1974), 213–27;CrossRefGoogle Scholar reprinted in Divine Commands and Morality, edited by Helm, Paul (Oxford University Press, 1981), p. 121.Google Scholar