Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:18:30.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Logic of Questions and the Existence of God

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

James J. Heaney
James J. Heaney
Affiliation:
Associate Editor, The Westminster Press, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

O.I. When we ask ‘Does God exist?’, what kind of question are we asking and, further does it make a difference that it is one kind of question rather than another? To find answers to these we will begin by investigating the various kinds of questions to which it seems ‘Does God exist?’ belongs, including questions about physical states of affairs, questions requesting reasons, and questions concerned somehow with the difficult notion of ‘existence’. As part of this initial inquiry we will also examine the relation of presupposition to question and the significance of both negation and assertion in questions.

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , June 1980 , pp. 203 - 216
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 203 note 1 A usage initiated in and, M. L.Prior, A. N., ‘Erotetic Logic’, The Philosophical Review, LXIV (1955), 43–59.Google Scholar

page 203 note 2 Principles of Reasoning (New York: Dover, 1967), p. 33.Google Scholar

page 204 note 1 De Interpretatione 20 b 22Google Scholar; Topica 160a 34.Google Scholar

page 204 note 2 For further elaboration of these terms, see Strawson, P. F., Introduction to Logical Theory, pp. 18Google Scholar, 30 n, 175–9, 186–7, 213–17; and Leonard, H. S., Principles, pp. 34–6.Google Scholar

page 204 note 3 Principles, pp. 36–7.Google Scholar

page 205 note 1 Aristotle, , Prior Analytics 24a 16, trans. Cooke, H. P. and Tredennick, H. in Aristotle, 26 vols. (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1967), 1, 199.Google Scholar

page 205 note 2 Trans. Tredennick, H. and Forster, E. S. in Aristotle, Posterior Analytics/Topica (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1966), pp. 709–11.Google Scholar

page 206 note 1 In Topica Ciceronis, lib. 1; Patrologia Latina 64, 1048DGoogle Scholar, quoted in Chenu, M.-D., Toward Understanding Saint Thomas, trans. Landry, A.-M. and Hughes, D. (Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1964), p. 94.Google Scholar

page 207 note 1 ‘Where Does the World Come From?’ in Without Answers (New York: Schocken, 1969), pp. 115–19.Google Scholar

page 207 note 2 As in Belnap, Nuel D. Jr, ‘Questions and Presuppositions’, in The Logical Way of Doing Things, ed. Lambert, Karel (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1969), p. 35.Google Scholar

page 207 note 3 On Certainty, ed. Anscombe, G. E. M. and Wright, G. E., trans, Anscombe, G. E. M. and Paul, Denis (New York: J. & J. Harper Editions, 1969), pp. 2–27.Google Scholar

page 209 note 1 Harrah, David, ‘A System for Erotetic Sentences’, in The Logical Enterprise, ed. Anderson, , Marcus, , and Martin, (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1975), pp. 235–45.Google Scholar

page 210 note 1 ‘Questions and Presuppositions’, p. 23.Google Scholar

page 210 note 2 Harrah, David, ‘Erotetic Logistics’, in The Logical Way of Doing Things, ed. Lambert, pp. 3–21.Google Scholar

page 210 note 3 See especially ‘Questions and Presuppositions’, pp. 34–7.

page 211 note 1 Philosophical Investigations, 1, 58.Google Scholar

page 213 note 1 ‘Erotetic Logic’, pp. 51–5.Google Scholar

page 213 note 2 ‘A System for Erotetic Sentences’, pp. 237–9.Google Scholar

page 213 note 3 Trans. McGill, Arthur C., in The Many-Faced Argument, ed. Hick, John and McGill, Arthur C., p. 4.Google Scholar

page 214 note 1 See, for instance, The Divine Names of Pseudo-Dionysius, inDionysius the Areopagite, trans. Rolt, C. E. (London: SPCK, 1940), pp. 50–190.Google Scholar

page 214 note 2 Reasons and Faiths (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1958), pp. 20–53.Google Scholar

page 215 note 1 Monologion, in Saint Anselm: Basic Writings, trans. Deane, S. N., 2nd edn (La Salle, Illinois: Open Court, 1962), pp. 37–40Google Scholar; Proslogion, preface, in Ibid. pp. 1–3.

page 215 note 2 Summa Theologiae, 1a 2, 3Google Scholar; Summa Contra Gentiles, 1, 13.Google Scholar

page 215 note 3 Thus Bernard Lonergan: ‘…I should say that normally religious conversion precedes the effort to work out rigorous proofs for the existence of God. But I do not think it impossible that such proofs might be a factor facilitating religious conversion so that, by way of exception, certain knowledge of God's existence should precede the acceptance of God's gift of his love.’ Method in Theology (New York: Herder and Herder, 1972), p. 339.Google Scholar