Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:06:55.582Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Literary and Dramatic Character of Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

A. G. Vink
A. G. Vink
Affiliation:
Lelystad
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The purpose of this paper is to establish the importance of what is sometimes called ‘the literary and dramatic character’ of Hume's Dialogues. This importance is such that not taking this specific character of the Dialogues into account leads to conclusions opposite to the ones Hume, in the special form he gave to his work, was trying to impart to his readers. I will offer my analysis in opposition to the one, voiced by, for instance D. W. Harward, in which ‘the apparent philosophical inconsistencies in the Dialogues are resolved without appeal to Hume's commitment to “literary or dramatic balance,” an appeal few of us find convincing or philosophically interesting’ (Harward, 1976, p. 138). The last part of Harward's statement is of course only of biographical interest; however, the attempt to offer an interpretation of Hume's Dialogues in which the literary character of the work is wilfully set aside, comes to missing a basic understanding for the man and the work. In what follows I will make this explicit by a number of points, each of which shows the importance of this literary and dramatic character of the Dialogues. In each case the result could not be reached without taking this special character into account.

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 22 , Issue 3-4 , September 1986 , pp. 387 - 396
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bricke, John. ‘On the Interpretation of Hume's Dialogues’, Religious Studies, XI (1975), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harward, Donald W. ‘Hume's Dialogues Revisited’, International journal for Philosophy of Religion, VI (1975), 137–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendel, Charles W.Studies in the Philosophy of David Hume. Indianapolis, 1963 (1925). Reprinted New York, 1983.Google Scholar
Norman, Kemp Smith (ed.). David Hume, Dialogues concerning Natural Religion. Indianapolis,1947 (1935).Google Scholar
Laird, John. Hume's Philosophy of Human Nature. London, 1932. Reprinted Hamden, Connecticut, 1967.Google Scholar
Letters I, II. The Letters of David Hume, 2 vols. ed. Greig, J. Y. T.. Oxford, 1932. Reprinted New York, 1983.Google Scholar
Lübker, Fr. Reallexicon des klassischen Altertums. Leipzig, 1891 (11854).Google Scholar
Mossner, Ernest C. ‘Hume and the Legacy of the Dialogues’, in: David Hume, Bicentenary Papers. ed. Morice, G. P., Edinburgh, 1977, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Noxon, James. Hume's Philosophical Development. Oxford, 1973.Google Scholar
Pauly, . Paulys Real-Encyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft. VIII (Neue Bearb.), Stuttgart, 1913.Google Scholar
Rohatyn, Dennis. ‘Hume's Dialectical Conceits: The Case of Dialogue XII’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, XLIII (1982–1983), 519–32.Google Scholar
Sutherland, Stewart R. ‘Penelhum on Hume’, Philosophical Quarterly, XXXIII (1983), 182–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar