Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:59:06.479Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is penal substitution incoherent? An examination of Mark Murphy's criticisms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2017

WILLIAM LANE CRAIG
WILLIAM LANE CRAIG*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Houston Baptist University, 7502 Fondren Road, Houston, TX, 77074, USA and Department of Philosophy, Talbot School of Theology, Biola University, La Mirada, CA 90639, USA
*
e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Some critics of the doctrine of penal substitution have alleged that the doctrine is incoherent because punishment entails an attitude of condemnation or censure towards the person punished, which is impossible in the case of Christ. It is shown that this objection is multiply flawed and that a number of viable ways of avoiding the alleged incoherence are available to the penal substitution theorist.

Type
Original Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 54 , Issue 4 , December 2018 , pp. 509 - 526
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Crouch, Jeffrey (2009) The Presidential Pardon Power (Lawrence KS: University Press of Kansas).Google Scholar
Donnellan, Keith (1966) ‘Reference and definite descriptions’, Philosophical Review, 75, 281–304.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Joel (1970) ‘The expressive function of punishment’, in Doing and Deserving: Essays in the Theory of Responsibility (Princeton: Princeton University Press), 95–118.Google Scholar
Fuller, L. L. (1930) ‘Legal fictions’, Illinois Law Review, 25, 363–399.Google Scholar
Fuller, L. L. (1931a) ‘Legal fictions’, Illinois Law Review, 25, 513–546.Google Scholar
Fuller, L. L. (1931b) ‘Legal fictions’, Illinois Law Review, 25, 877–910.Google Scholar
Gathercole, Simon (2015) Defending Substitution: An Essay on Atonement in Paul (Grand Rapids MI: Baker Academic).Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo (1889) A Defence of the Catholic Faith concerning the Satisfaction of Christ, against Faustus Socinus, Foster, Frank Hugh (tr.) (Andover MA: Warren F. Draper).Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (1968) Punishment and Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Hilborn, David (2008) ‘Atonement, evangelicalism and the Evangelical Alliance: the present debate in context’, in Tidball, Derek, Hilborn, David, & Thacker, Justin (eds) The Atonement Debate (Grand Rapids MI: Zondervan), 15–33.Google Scholar
Hill, Daniel J. & Jedwab, Joseph (2015) ‘Atonement and the concept of punishment’, in Crisp, Oliver D. & Sanders, Fred (eds) Locating Atonement: Explorations in Constructive Dogmatics (Grand Rapids MI: Zondervan), 139–153.Google Scholar
Husak, Douglas (2005) ‘Malum prohibitum and retributivism’, in Duff, R. A. & Green, Stuart P. (eds) Defining Crimes: Essays on the Special Part of the Criminal Law, Oxford Monographs on Criminal Law and Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 65–90.Google Scholar
Jeffery, Steve, Ovey, Michael & Sach, Andrew (2007) Pierced for Our Transgressions: Rediscovering the Glory of Penal Substitution (Wheaton IL: Crossway Books).Google Scholar
Jensen, Paul (1993) ‘Forgiveness and atonement’, Scottish Journal of Theology, 46, 150–151.Google Scholar
Leigh, L. H. (1982) Strict and Vicarious Liability: A Study in Administrative Criminal Law, Modern Legal Studies (London: Sweet & Maxwell).Google Scholar
Lewis, David (1997) ‘‘Do we believe in penal substitution?’, Philosophical Papers, 26, 203–209.Google Scholar
Lincoln, Andrew T. (1995) ‘From wrath to justification: tradition, gospel, and audience in the theology of Romans 1:18–4:25’, in Hay, David M. & Johnson, E. Elizabeth (eds) Pauline Theology, III: Romans (Minneapolis: Fortress), 130–159.Google Scholar
Lind, Douglas (2015) ‘The pragmatic value of legal fictions’, in Del Mar, Maksymilian & Twining, William (eds) Legal Fictions in Theory and Practice, Law and Philosophy Library CX (Cham: Springer Verlag), 83–111.Google Scholar
Luther, Martin (1939) Commentary on St. Paul's Epistle to the Galatians, Graebner, Theodore (tr.), Christian Classics Ethereal Library (Grand Rapids MI: Zondervan).Google Scholar
Marshall, I. Howard (2008) ‘The theology of the atonement’, in Tidball, Derek, Hilborn, David, & Thacker, Justin (eds) The Atonement Debate (Grand Rapids MI: Zondervan), 49–69.Google Scholar
Morris, Leon (1983) The Atonement: Its Meaning and Significance (Downers Grove IL: IVP).Google Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. (2009) ‘Not penal substitution but vicarious punishment’, Faith and Philosophy, 26, 253–273.Google Scholar
Murray, John (1959) The Imputation of Adam's Sin (Grand Rapids MI: William B. Eerdmans).Google Scholar
Ormerod, David (2011) Smith and Hogan's Criminal Law, 13th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Owen, John (n.d./Latin version 1653) A Dissertation on Divine Justice: or, the Claims of Vindicatory Justice asserted (London: L. J. Higham).Google Scholar
Porter, Steven L. (2004) ‘Swinburnian Atonement and the doctrine of penal substitution’, Faith and Philosophy, 21, 228–241.Google Scholar
Quinton, A. M. (1954) ‘On punishment’, Analysis, 14, 133–142.Google Scholar
Ripstein, Arthur (2002) ‘Philosophy of tort law’, in Coleman, Jules & Schapiro, Scott (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 656–686.Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick (2015) ‘Legal fictions revisited’, in Del Mar, Maksymilian & Twining, William (eds) Legal Fictions in Theory and Practice, Law and Philosophy Library CX (Switzerland: Springer Verlag), 113–130.Google Scholar
Stott, John (1986) The Cross of Christ (Leicester: IVP).Google Scholar
Strasser, Mark (2002) ‘The limits of the clemency power on pardons, retributivists, and the United States Constitution’, Brandeis Law Journal, 41, 85–154.Google Scholar
Turretin, Francis Institutes of Elenctic Theology.Google Scholar
Vaihinger, Hans (1949) The Philosophy of ‘As if’, Ogden, C. K., 2nd edn, International Library of Psychology, Philosophy, and Scientific Method (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Walen, Alec (2014) ‘Retributive Justice,’ in Zalta, E. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2014 Edition). URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/justice-retributive/.Google Scholar
Weihofen, Henry (1939) ‘The Effect of a Pardon’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 88, 177–193.Google Scholar
Williston, Samuel (1915) ‘Does a pardon blot out guilt?’, Harvard Law Review, 28, 647–663.Google Scholar
Zaibert, Leo (2006) Punishment and Retribution (Aldershot: Ashgate).Google Scholar