Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:46:31.147Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hume on prophecy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2015

PADDY JANE MCSHANE*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Georgetown University, 37th and O Streets, N. W., Washington, D. C., 20057, USA e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Hume claims that his argument against miracles applies ‘without any variation’ to prophecies. While Hume's argument against miracles has been thoroughly examined in the philosophical literature, his claim that this argument works against prophecies has been left relatively unexplored. In this article I examine Hume's conception of ‘prophecy’ and I argue that it is flawed. I also argue, however, that Hume's argument against miracles does indeed apply to prophecies, but only if we amend Hume's conception of ‘prophecy’. I articulate and defend such an amendment.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beauchamp, Tom (1999) ‘Introduction’ to Hume, David, An Enquiry Human Understanding (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Davison, Scott (2010) ‘Prophecy’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer 2010, Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2010/entries/prophecy/>.Google Scholar
Harrison, Peter (1999) ‘Early modern apologetics, and Hume's argument against miracles’, Journal of History of Ideas, 60, 241256.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1999) An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Beauchamp, Tom L. (ed.) (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Spinoza, Baruch (1862) Tractatus Theologico-Politicus, Willis, Robert (tr.) (London: Trubner & Co.).Google Scholar