Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:53:45.055Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feminism, Constructivism and Numinous Experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Melissa Raphael
Melissa Raphael
Affiliation:
Cheltenham and Gloucester College of Higher Education, PO Box 220, The Park, Cheltenham GL50 2QF
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article brings together constructivist epistemology and feminist study of religion to provide phenomenological evidence that numinous consciousness is not the immediate, sui generis essence of religious experience that Rudolf Otto believed it to be. Whilst there are certain peculiarities in the Ottonian scheme that might make numinous consciousness unusually resistant to conceptual and ideological mediation, it can be shown that androcentric epistemological and axiological structures make the experience intelligible and worthy of accommodation within a given patriarchal religious tradition. By contrast, contemporary gynocentric spiritualities in which women celebrate their psychobiological difference as itself a necessary medium of religious experience, have no interest in protecting the holy from the limitations of its immanence.

Type
Research Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , December 1994 , pp. 511 - 526
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 ‘Language, Epistemology and Mysticism’ in Katz, S. (ed.), Mysticism and Philosophical Analysis (London: Sheldon Press, 1978). Although Katz does not discuss the numinous as such, much of his argument is relevant to the present article since Otto considered that mystical and numinous experience were categorically continuous.Google Scholar

2 Ibid. p. 40.

3 Ibid. p. 41.

4 Ibid. p. 56.

5 Ibid. p. 33.

6 Fiorenza, Elisabeth Schüssler ‘Introduction’ to Bread not Stone: The Challenge of Feminist Biblical Interpretation in Gunew, S. (ed.), A Reader in Feminist Knowledge (London: Routledge, 1991), p. 266.Google Scholar

7 Respectively (New York: Oxford University Press, 1958) and (London: Oxford University Press, 1937).

8 The Idea of the Holy, p. 15.

9 Ibid. p. 175.

10 Ibid. p. 145.

11 Ibid. p. 8.

12 Flax, Jane, ‘Postmodernism and Gender Relations in Feminist Theory’ in Nicholson, L. (ed.), Feminism/Postmodernism (New York: Routledge, 1990), pp. 40–1.Google Scholar

13 It needs to be noted that while the postmodern deconstructive methods are useful, a feminist history of religions would also resist post-modernism in that religious feminism is premised upon an integral female subject who has struggled against socio-religious injustice. Both the struggle for and the quasieschatological achievement of justice form a meta-narrative of the real, painful struggle against patriarchy and all the other alienations that word encompasses.

14 Flax, , ‘Postmodernism and Gender Relations in Feminist Theory’, p. 43.Google Scholar

15 Saiving, Valerie, ‘Androcentrism in Religious Studies’, The Journal of Religion, lvi (1976), 177–97, P. 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16 Gross, Rita, ‘Androcentrism and Androgyny in the Methodology of History of Religions’ in Gross, R. M. (ed.), Beyond Androcentrism: New Essays on Women and Religion (Montana: Scholars Press, 1977), pp.7–99.Google Scholar

17 Ibid. p. 10.

18 ‘Mircea Eliade and the Feminist Paradigm Shift’, Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion vii (1991), 75–94, P. 94.Google Scholar

19 Ibid. p. 75.

20 ‘Thealogy’ refers to discourses concerning the Goddess or a female divine principle.

21 It should not be objected that I am not comparing like with like as The Idea of the Holy is far wider in its reference than biblical monotheism.

22 Schlamm, Leon, ‘Numinous Experience and Religious Language’, Religious Studies, xxviii (1992), 533–51. P. 534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

23 See e.g. The Idea of the Holy, pp. 112–16, 136–42, 175–7.

24 See Forman, R. (ed.), The Problem of Pure Consciousness (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990) which contains a variety of refutations of Katz's position. For a scathing response to the Forman collectionGoogle Scholar see Bagger, M., ‘Ecumenicalism and Perennialism Revisited’, Religious Studies, xxvii (1991), 399–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

25 ‘Numinous Experience and Religious Language’, p. 548.

26 Ibid. p. 549.

27 The Idea of the Holy, p. 28.

28 Ibid. Appendix VIII ‘Silent Worship’, p. 212.

29 (New York: Macmillan, 1976), p. 110. See also, India's Religion of Grace and Christianity Compared and Contrasted (London: SCM, 1930), pp. 75–80.Google Scholar

30 The Idea of the Holy, p. 113.

31 Ibid. p. 10.

32 Ibid. pp. 19–20.

33 Religious Essays. 33.

34 Ibid. p. 34.

35 Ibid. p. 18.

36 Ibid, p. 41.

37 See Brown, Peter, The Body and Society: Men, Women and Sexual Renunciation in Early Christianity (London: Faber & Faber, 1989), p. 48.Google Scholar

38 The Kingdom of God and the Son of Man (London: Lutterworth, 1938), p. 49.Google ScholarCf. The Philosophy of Religion (London: Williams and Norgate, 1931), p. 131. In this earlier, more optimistic, period of his work Otto is still strongly influenced by Schleiermacher and is able to recommend ‘ a way of seeing that all that is is in fact an appearance of transcendental Reality’.Google Scholar

39 ‘Androcentrism in Religious Studies’, p. 192.

40 See Jay's, Nancy ‘Gender and Dichotomy’ in Gunew, (ed.), A Reader in Feminist Knowledge, esp. pp. 90–1, on the way in which Durkheim's separation of the sacred and the profane leads to belief that women are and should be excluded from the ritual and conceptual functions of religion;Google ScholarDaly, Mary, Gyn/Ecology: The Metaethics of Radical Feminism (London: The Women's Press, 1991), pp. 47–9;Google ScholarGoldenberg, Naomi, The Changing of the Gods (Boston: Beacon Press, 1979), p. 193.Google Scholar

41 See e.g. The Idea of the Holy, p. 57.

42 Craighead, Meinrad, ‘Immanent Mother’, in Giles, M. (ed.), The Feminist Mystic and Other Essays on Women and Spirituality (New York: The Crossroad Publishing Company, 1982), p. 79.Google Scholar

43 See Falk, Nancy Auer, ‘Feminine Sacrality’, vol. 5, The Encyclopaedia of Religion, ed. Eliade, M. (New York: Macmillan, 1987).Google Scholar

44 ‘Epistemology or Bust: A Maternal Feminist Knowledge of Knowing’, The Journal of Religion, lxxii (1985), 229–47, pp. 232–3.Google Scholar

45 Ibid. p. 233.

46 The Idea of the Holy, pp. 54–5.

47 P. 83.

48 New Age and Armageddon: The Goddess or the Gurus? Towards a Feminist Vision of the Future (London: The Women's Press, 1992), pp. 51–6. Omission marks hers.Google Scholar

49 The Idea of the Holy, pp. 12–13.

50 ‘Rudolf Otto and Mystical Experience’, Religious Studies, xxvii (1991), 389–98, pp. 392–3.Google Scholar

51 ‘Understanding Religious Experience’, in Kate, S. (ed.), Mysticism and Philosophical Analysis, p. 13.Google Scholar

52 Idem, Philosophers and Religious Truth (London: SCM, 1969), p. 112.Google Scholar

53 For counter-arguments against Smart's categorization of numinous experience, see Almond, P., Mystical Experience and Religious Doctrine (Amsterdam: Mouton, 1982), chs. 3, 5; L. Schlamm, ‘Rudolf Otto and Mystical Experience’.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

54 The Idea of the Holy, p. 10.

55 The Idea of the Holy, p. 1.

56 From Sharpe, Eric, Nathan Söderblom and the Study of Religion (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1990) p. 44.Google Scholar

57 The Sacred and the Feminine: Toward a Theology of Housework (New York: Seabury Press, 1982), pp. 61–2.Google Scholar

68 (London: SPCK, 1989), p. 44.

59 Ibid. p. 44.

60 See e.g. Beardsworth, T., A Sense of Presence (Manchester College, Oxford: The Religious Experience Research Unit, 1977), pp. 116–28. All female respondents report a comforting, markedly non-numinous divine presence.Google Scholar

61 See Saiving, V., ‘The Human Situation: A Feminine View,’ in Christ, C. and Plaskow, J. (eds.), Womanspirit Rising (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1979), pp. 25–42.Google Scholar

62 These divisions revolve around women's decision to reform the patriarchal tradition from within, or to depart for new or rediscovered — generally neo-pagan — non-masculinist religious environments.

63 Craighead, , ‘Immanent Mother’, p. 81. Note that calling God ‘Mother’ does not, as in this case, necessarily denote a post-Christian position.Google Scholar

64 Ibid. p. 79.

65 Saiving, ‘Androcentrism in Religious Studies’, p. 197.