Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T03:02:25.997Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evil and the complexity of history: a response to Durston

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2003

NICK TRAKAKIS
NICK TRAKAKIS
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Kirk Durston recently presented an argument aimed against evidential arguments from evil predicated on instances of suffering that appear to be gratuitous; ‘The consequential complexity of history and gratuitous evil’, Religious Studies, 36 (2000), 65–80. He begins with the notion that history consists of an intricate web of causal chains, so that a single event in one such chain may have countless unforeseen consequences. According to Durston, this consequential complexity exhibited by history negatively impacts on our grasp of the data necessary to determine whether or not an evil is gratuitous. He therefore concludes that our epistemic condition poses an insurmountable barrier towards the inference from inscrutability to pointlessness. By way of reply, I contend that Durston's argument is flawed in two significant respects, and thus the evidential argument emerges unscathed from his critique.

Type
Research Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 39 , Issue 4 , December 2003 , pp. 451 - 458
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)