Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T05:03:52.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do possible worlds compromise God's beauty? A reply to Mark Ian Thomas Robson

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2012

JON ROBSON
JON ROBSON*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a recent article Mark Ian Thomas Robson argues that there is a clear contradiction between the view that possible worlds are a part of God's nature and the theologically pivotal, but philosophically neglected, claim that God is perfectly beautiful. In this article I show that Robson's argument depends on several key assumptions that he fails to justify and as such that there is reason to doubt the soundness of his argument. I also demonstrate that if Robson's argument were sound then this would be a problem for all classical theists and not just those who hold the possible worlds view.

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 48 , Issue 4 , December 2012 , pp. 515 - 532
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cameron, Ross P. (2009) ‘God exists at every (modal realist) world: a reply to Sheehy’, Religious Studies, 45, 95–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, Gregory (2010) Narratives and Narrators (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Divers, John (2002) Possible Worlds (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Efird, David (manuscript) ‘Theological idealism about possible worlds’.Google Scholar
Forrest, Peter (1986) ‘Ways worlds could be’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 64, 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, Laura (1984) ‘A response to the modal problem of evil’, Faith and Philosophy, 4, 375–358.Google Scholar
Gaut, Berys (2007) Art, Emotion and Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guleserian, Theodore (1983) ‘God and possible worlds: the modal problem of evil’, Nous, 17, 221–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Mark (1989) ‘Dispositional theories of value’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 63, 139–174.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. (1710/1951) Theodicy: Essays on the Goodness of God, the Freedom of Man and the Origin of Evil (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Lewis, David (1982) ‘Logic for equivocators’, Nous, 16, 431–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David (1986) On the Plurality of Worlds (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin (1974) The Nature of Necessity (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin (2003) Does God have a Nature? (Milwaukee: Marquette University Press).Google Scholar
Pseudo-Dionysius (1978) Pseudo-Dionysius: The Complete Works (London: Classics of Western Spirituality).Google Scholar
Robson, Mark Ian Thomas (2011) ‘Possible worlds and the beauty of God’, Religious Studies, 47, 479–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheehy, Paul (2006) ‘Theism and modal realism’, Religious Studies, 42, 315–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheehy, Paul (2009) ‘Reply to Cameron’, Religious Studies, 45, 101–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherry, Patrick (2002) Spirit and Beauty (London: SCM Press).Google Scholar
Scruton, Roger (1981) ‘Photography and representation’, Critical Enquiry, 7, 577–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorensen, Roy (2002) ‘The art of the impossible’, in Hawthorne, J. & Gendler, T. (eds) Conceivability and Possibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 337–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert C. (1976) ‘Possible worlds’, Nous, 10, 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tidman, Paul (1993) ‘The epistemology of evil possibilities’, Faith and Philosophy, 10, 181–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Inwagen, P. (1998) ‘Modal epistemology’, Philosophical Studies, 92, 67–84.Google Scholar
van Inwagen, P. (2006) The Problem of Evil (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar