Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T17:25:49.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Copernican principle, intelligent extraterrestrials, and arguments from evil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2018

SAMUEL RUHMKORFF Open the ORCID record for SAMUEL RUHMKORFF [Opens in a new window]
SAMUEL RUHMKORFF*
Affiliation:
Division of Social Studies, Bard College at Simon's Rock, Great Barrington, MA 01230, USA
*
e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The physicist Richard Gott defends the Copernican principle, which claims that when we have no information about our position along a given dimension among a group of observers, we should consider ourselves to be randomly located among those observers in respect to that dimension. First, I apply Copernican reasoning to the distribution of evil in the universe. I then contend that evidence for intelligent extraterrestrial life strengthens four important versions of the argument from evil. I remain neutral regarding whether this result is a reductio of these arguments from evil or the statement of a genuine evidential relationship.

Type
Original Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 55 , Special Issue 3: Religious Experience and Desire , September 2019 , pp. 297 - 317
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Marilyn McCord (1999) Horrendous Evils and the Goodness of God (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Adams, Robert (1972) ‘Must God create the best?’, The Philosophical Review, 81, 317–332.Google Scholar
Alston, William (1996) ‘The inductive argument from evil and the human cognitive condition’, in Howard-Snyder, D. (ed.) The Evidential Argument from Evil (Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press), 97–125.Google Scholar
Baggett, David (2006) ‘Bruce Russell's analogy and the evidential problem of evil’, Philosophia Christi, 8, 463–473.Google Scholar
Carter, Brandon (1983) ‘The anthropic principle and its implications for biological evolution’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, A 310, 347–363.Google Scholar
Chisholm, Roderick (1990) ‘The defeat of good and evil’, in Adams, M. M. & Adams, R. M. (eds) The Problem of Evil (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 53–68.Google Scholar
Cohen, Yishai (2013) ‘Skeptical theism and the threshold problem’, Forum Philosophicum, 18, 73–92.Google Scholar
Dostoevsky, Fyodor (1990) The Brothers Karamazov, Pevear, R. & Volokhonsky, L. (trs) (New York: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux).Google Scholar
Draper, Paul (2004) ‘Cosmic fine-tuning and terrestrial suffering: parallel problems of naturalism and theism’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 41, 311–321.Google Scholar
Gale, Richard M. (1996) ‘Some difficulties in theistic treatments of evil’, in Howard-Snyder, D. (ed.) The Evidential Argument from Evil (Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press), 206–218.Google Scholar
Gott, J. Richard (1993) ‘Implications of the Copernican Principle for our future prospects’, Nature, 363, 315–319.Google Scholar
Gott, J. Richard (1994) ‘Future prospects discussed’, Nature, 368, 108.Google Scholar
Gott, J. Richard (1996) ‘Our future in the universe’, in Trimble, V. & Reisenegger, A. (eds) Clusters, Lensing, and the Future of the Universe (San Francisco: Astronomical Society of the Pacific), 140–151.Google Scholar
Gott, J. Richard (2001) Time Travel in Einstein's Universe (Boston: Houghton Mifflin).Google Scholar
Hasker, William (1992) ‘The necessity of gratuitous evil’, Faith and Philosophy, 9, 23–44.Google Scholar
Hick, John (1990) ‘Soul-making and suffering’, in Adams, M. M. & Adams, R. M. (eds) The Problem of Evil (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 168–188.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, Harold (1939) Theory of Probability (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Kraay, Klaas J. (2013) ‘Megill's multiverse meta-argument’, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 73, 235–241.Google Scholar
Leslie, John (1990) ‘Is the end of the world nigh?’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 40, 65–72.Google Scholar
Lewis, David (2001) ‘Survival and identity’, in Loux, M. (ed.) Metaphysics: Contemporary Readings (London: Routledge), 395–419.Google Scholar
McGrath, P. J. (1992) ‘Is the problem of evil misconceived?’, Religious Studies, 28, 61–64.Google Scholar
Monton, Bradley (2010) ‘Against multiverse theodicies’, Philo, 13, 113–135.Google Scholar
Monton, Bradley & Kierland, Brian (2006) ‘How to predict future duration from present age’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 56, 16–38.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas (1970) ‘Death’, Nous, 4, 73–80.Google Scholar
NASA (2014) ‘TESS: Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite’, <https://tess.gsfc.nasa.gov/documents/TESS_FactSheet_Oct2014.pdf>, [accessed 3 August 2016].,+[accessed+3+August+2016].>Google Scholar
NASA (2015) ‘James Webb Space Telescope – The science mission’, <http://jwst.nasa.gov/resources/2015JWSTlitho.pdf> [accessed 3 August 2016].+[accessed+3+August+2016].>Google Scholar
Parfit, Derek (1984) Reasons and Persons (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin (1977) God, Freedom, and Evil, 2nd edn (Grand Rapids MI: William B. Eerdmans).Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin (1979) ‘The probabilistic argument from evil’, Philosophical Studies, 35, 1–53.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin (1996) ‘Epistemic probability and evil’, in Howard-Snyder, D. (ed.) The Evidential Argument from Evil (Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press), 69–96.Google Scholar
Rowe, William (1979) ‘The problem of evil and some varieties of atheism’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 16, 335–341.Google Scholar
Rowe, William (1984) ‘Evil and the theistic hypothesis: a response to Wykstra’, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 16, 95–100.Google Scholar
Rowe, William (1996) ‘The evidential argument from evil: a second look’, in Howard-Snyder, D. (ed.) The Evidential Argument from Evil (Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press), 262–285.Google Scholar
Rowe, William (2006) ‘Friendly atheism, skeptical theism, and the problem of evil’, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 59, 79–92.Google Scholar
Russell, Bruce (1996) ‘Defenseless’, in Howard-Snyder, D. (ed.) The Evidential Argument from Evil (Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press), 193–205.Google Scholar
Simpson, Fergus (2016) ‘The size distribution of inhabited planets’, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, <http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.07804> [accessed 25 February 2016].+[accessed+25+February+2016].>Google Scholar
Stump, Eleanore (1985) ‘The problem of evil’, Faith and Philosophy, 2, 392–423.Google Scholar
Stump, Eleanore (2010) Wandering in Darkness: Narrative and the Problem of Suffering (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Swinburne, Richard (1998) Providence and the Problem of Evil (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Tracy, Thomas F. (1992) ‘Victimization and the problem of evil: a response to Ivan Karamazov’, Faith and Philosophy, 9, 301–319.Google Scholar
Trakakis, Nick (2008) ‘Theodicy: the solution to the problem of evil, or part of the problem?’, Sophia, 47, 161–191.Google Scholar
Vallentyne, Peter, & Kagan, Shelly (1997) ‘Infinite value and finitely additive value theory’, The Journal of Philosophy, 94, 5–26.Google Scholar
van Inwagen, Peter (1996) ‘The problem of evil, the problem of air, and the problem of silence’, in Howard-Snyder, D. (ed.) The Evidential Argument from Evil (Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press), 151–175.Google Scholar
van Inwagen, Peter (2006) The Problem of Evil (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Velleman, David (2015) Beyond Price: Essays on Birth and Death. (Cambridge: Open Book Publishers).Google Scholar
Wykstra, Stephen J. (1990) ‘The Humean obstacle to evidential arguments from suffering: on avoiding the evils of “appearance”’, in Adams, M. M. & Adams, R. M. (eds) The Problem of Evil (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 138–160.Google Scholar
Wykstra, Stephen J. (1996) ‘Rowe's noseeum arguments from evil’, in Howard-Snyder, D. (ed.) The Evidential Argument from Evil (Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press), 126–150.Google Scholar
Zagzebski, Linda (1996) ‘An agent-based approach to the problem of evil’, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 39, 127–139.Google Scholar