Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-05T02:22:37.651Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Anthropic Coincidences, Evil and The Disconfirmation of Theism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Quentin Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Antioch College, Yellow Springs, Ohio45387

Extract

The anthropic principle or the associated anthropic coincidences have been used by philosophers such as John Leslie (1989), William Lane Craig (1988) and Richard Swinburne (1990) to support the thesis that God exists. In this paper I shall examine Swinburne's argument from the anthropic coincidences. I will show that Swinburne's premises, coupled with his principle of credulity and the failure of his theodicy in The Existence of God, disconfirms theism and confirms instead the hypothesis that there exists a malevolent creator of the universe.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Craig, William Lane [1989]. ‘Barrow and Tipler on the anthropic principle vs. divine design’. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 39, 389–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leslie, John [1989]. Universes. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Salmon, Wesley [1975]. ‘Confirmation and relevance’. In Maxwell, G. and Anderson, R., eds., Induction, Probability, and Confirmation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Quentin [1991]. ‘Atheism, theism and big bang cosmology’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 69, 4866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinburne, Richard [1979]. The Existence of God. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Swinburne, Richard [1990]. ‘The argument from the fine-tuning of the universe’. In John, Leslie, ed., Physical Cosmology and Philosophy. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar