Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:35:44.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Religion and the pursuit of truth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2003

BRIAN ZAMULINSKI
BRIAN ZAMULINSKI
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Saskatchewan, 9 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, S7N 5A5
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This is a new argument to the effect that religions are not truth-oriented. In other words, it is not a fundamental function of religion to represent the world accurately. I compare two hypotheses with respect to their likelihood (in A. W. F. Edwards's technical sense). The one which entails that religion is not truth-oriented is a better explanation than its competitor for a number of empirical observations about religion. It is also at least as probable. I point out that, once one has established that religions are not truth-oriented, it is possible to argue that religions are false and it is possible to run a sound ad hominem argument against religious believers who advance religious claims. I suggest that the results are early ones and that what matters is evaluating religion in the way I illustrate in this paper. The ad hominem argument shows that the question of whether religion is truth-oriented is particularly important.

Type
Research Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , March 2003 , pp. 43 - 60
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)