Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:39:10.480Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The power of rituals: Mendelssohn and Cassirer on the religious dimension of Bildung

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2014

ANNE POLLOK
ANNE POLLOK*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article discusses the ceremonial laws in Judaism as a language of religion and assesses their role within human self-formation (Bildung). Moses Mendelssohn's groundbreaking account on the function of ritual offers both a solution and a threat to this issue: on the one hand the capacity to perform and understand rituals can be seen as a form of self-liberation. At the same time, the general openness to interpretation makes this conception vulnerable to the destructive force of idolatry. With the aid of Ernst Cassirer's Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, this article offers a solution to this problem by showing how ritual functions as a dialogue between the members of a community; a dialogue that carries a distinctively ethical outreach.

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 50 , Issue 4 , December 2014 , pp. 445 - 464
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altmann, Alexander (1973) Moses Mendelssohn: A Biographical Study (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Altmann, Alexander (1983) ‘Introduction’, in Moses Mendelssohn, Jerusalem, Allan Arkush (tr.) (Hanover NH & London: University Press of New England), 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arkush, Allan (1994) Moses Mendelssohn and the Enlightenment (Albany: State University of New York Press).Google Scholar
Arkush, Allan (1999) ‘The questionable Judaism of Moses Mendelssohn’, New German Critique, 77, 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst (1923–1929) Die Philosophie der symbolischen Formen, 3 vols. German edition used: Gesammelte Werke, Birgit Recki (ed.), XI–XIII (Hamburg: Meiner, 1998–2009) [henceforth cited as ECW]. English edition used: The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, R. Manheim (tr.) (New Haven & London: Yale University Press, 1955–1957).Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst (1942) Zur Logik der Kulturwissenschaften, ECW XXIV. English edition used: The Logic of the Cultural Sciences S. G. Lofts (tr.) (New Haven & London: Yale University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst (1944) Essay on Man, ECW XXIII.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst (1995) Zur Metaphysik der Symbolischen Formen, in Nachgelassene Manuskripte und Texte, John Michael Krois (ed.), I (Hamburg: Meiner) [henceforth cited as NCW]. English edition used: The Metaphysics of Symbolic Forms. John Michael Krois (tr.) (New Haven & London: Yale University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Eisen, Arnold (1990) ‘Divine legislation as “ceremonial script”: Mendelssohn on the Commandments’, AJS Review, 15, 239–267.Google Scholar
Forster, Michael (2002) ‘Herder's philosophy of language, interpretation and translation: three fundamental principles’, Review of Metaphysics, 52, 323–356.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, Gideon (2004) ‘The missing core in Cassirer's philosophy: Homo Faber in thin air’, in Hamlin, Cyrus & Krois, John Michael (eds) Symbolic Forms and Cultural Studies: Ernst Cassirer's Theory of Culture (New Haven & London: Yale University Press), 203–226.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, Gideon (2012) No Religion without Idolatry: Mendelssohn's Jewish Enlightenment (Notre Dame IN: University of Notre Dame Press).Google Scholar
Goetschel, Willi (2004) Spinoza's Modernity: Mendelssohn, Lessing, and Heine (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press).Google Scholar
Goetschel, Willi (2013) The Discipline of Philosophy and the Invention of Modern Jewish Thought (New York: Fordham University Press).Google Scholar
Hilfrich, Carola (2005) ‘ “Making writing readable again”: sign praxis between the discourse on idolatry and cultural criticism’, The Journal of Religion, 85, 267–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendelssohn, Moses (1763) Über die Evidenz in den metaphysischen Wissenschaften, in Gesammelte Schriften:Jubiläumsausgabe, Alexander Altmann, Eva Engel, et al. (eds), II (Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog, 1971–) [henceforth cited as JubA] (JubA II). English edition used: On Evidence, Allan Arkush (tr.) (Hanover NH & London: University Press of New England, 1983).Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, Moses (1782) Jerusalem, in JubA VIII. English edition used: Jerusalem, Allan Arkush (tr.) (Hanover NH & London: University Press of New England, 1983).Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, Moses (1784) Ueber die Frage: was heißt aufklären?, in JubA VI.1, 113–119. English edition used: On the Question: What does ‘to enlighten’ Mean? Daniel Dahlstrom (tr.), in Moses Mendelssohn: Philosophical Writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), 311–316.Google Scholar
Schorch, Grit (2012) Moses Mendelssohns Sprachpolitik (Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spinoza, Baruch de (1670, 2007) Theologico-political Treatise, Jonathan Israel (tr.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar