Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:39:14.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Leaps and Circles: Kierkegaard and Newman on Faith and Reason

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

M. Jamie Ferreira
M. Jamie Ferreira
Affiliation:
Department of Religious Studies, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22903
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Søren Kierkegaard (in the Climacus writings) and John Henry Newman have starkly opposed formulations of the relation between faith and reason. In this essay I focus on a possible convergence in their respective understandings of the transition to religious belief or faith, as embodied in metaphors they use for a qualitative transition. I explore the ways in which attention to the legitimate dimension of discontinuity highlighted by the Climacan metaphor of the ‘leap’ can illuminate Newman's use of the metaphor of a ‘polygon inscribed in a circle’, as well as the ways in which Newman's metaphor can illuminate the dimension of continuity operative in the Climacan appreciation of qualitative transition.

Type
Research Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , December 1994 , pp. 379 - 397
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 ‘Unreal Words’, Parochial and Plain Sermons V (London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1868), p. 45.

2 ‘Kierkegaard-Newman’, Przywara, Erich, Newman-Studien, vol. 1, pp. 77–101 (Nurnberg: Glock und Lutz, 1948), p. 96, my translation.Google Scholar

3 Religion and Imagination: ‘in aid of a grammar of assent’ (Oxford: Clarendon, 1981), p. 71.

4 An Essay in Aid of a Grammar of Assent (London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1901), p. 320; hereafter page references within the text, unless otherwise qualified, are to this work.

5 Coulson, , Religion and Imagination, p. 49;Google Scholar see also pp. 69–70.

6 Theological Papers of John Henry Newman on Faith and Certainty (Oxford: Clarendon, 1976), p. 126. Hereafter TP.

7 More detail on this revisioning can be found in my ‘The Grammar of the Heart: Newman on Faith and Imagination’, in Discourse and Context: An Interdisciplinary Study of John Henry Newman (Carbondale: Southern Illinois Press, 1993), pp. 129–43.

8 Theological Papers, p. 124; also Grammar of Assent, p. 174.

9 Letters and Diaries of John Henry Newman, vol. XXVII (27 11 1874), pp. 161–2; I provide more warrant and detail in Scepticism and Reasonable Doubt: The British Naturalist Tradition in Wilkins, Hume, Reid, and Newman (Oxford: Clarendon, 1986), esp. pp. 186–8.

10 Burrell, , ‘Religious Belief and Rationality’, in Rationality and Religious Belief, ed. Delaney, C. F. (Notre Dame, In.: Notre Dame University Press, 1979), p. 107, pp. 98–112 passim.Google Scholar

11 Fifteen Sermons Preached Before the University of Oxford (1826–43) (London: SPCK, 1970), pp. 182–4; hereafter OUS.

12 Burrell, , ‘Religious Belief and Rationality’, p. 108.Google Scholar

13 Soren Kierkegaard's Journals and Papers, ed. Hong, H. V and Hong, E. H (Bloomington: Indiana University Press), vol. 4: I A 313, 24 Dec. 1836, p. 274.Google Scholar

14 The Concept of Irony, Kierkegaard's Writings, II (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989), p. 21.Google Scholar

15 Journals, vol. 2: III B 14, n.d., 1840–1, p. 232.

16 Barrett, Cyril, Wittgenstein on Ethics and Religious Belief (Oxford: B. Blackwell, 1991), p. 154.Google Scholar

17 Evans, C. Stephen, Passionate Reason: Making Sense of Kierkegaard's Philosophical Fragments (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1992), p. 116.Google Scholar

18 The remaining discussion of the leap and paradoxical choice draws and depends on the fuller account given in my Transforming Vision: Imagination and Will in Kierkegaardian Faith (Oxford: Clarendon, 1991), Chaps I–III.Google Scholar

19 Journals, vol. 3: VII2 B 261: 22, n.d., 1846–7, p. 21.

20 Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments, Kierkegaard's Writings, XII.I (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992), pp. 12, 381. Hereafter CUP.Google Scholar

21 Philosophical Fragments, Kierkegaard's Writings, VII (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985), pp. 43, 62; hereafter PF.Google Scholar

22 Journals, vol. 2: V B 56: 2, n.d., 1844, pp. 61–2; also see the following note (23).

23 Journals, vol. 2: VII1 A 181, n.d., 1846, pp. 62–3; I A 5, 19 Aug. 1834, p. 56; X2 A 428, n.d., 1850, p. 68; X3 A 618, n.d., 1850, pp. 70–2.

24 Journals, vol. 2: X4 A 175, n.d., 1851, p. 73; X2 A 243, n.d., 1849, p. 67; III A 48, n.d., 1840, p. 59; IV C 39, n.d., 1842–43, p. 59.

25 Journals, vol. 2: X4 A 177, n.d., 1851, p. 74; X2 A 428, n.d., 1850, p. 68.

26 Journals, vol. 3: V C 7, n.d., 1844, p. 19; VI A 33, n.d., 1845, p. 20.

27 Journals, vol. 3: V C I, n.d., 1844, p. 17.

28 Journals, vol. 3: V C 7, n.d., 1844, p. 19.

29 Grammar, pp. 396–8; TP, p. 156; Philosophical Notebooks, II (Louvain: Nauwelaerts Publ., 1970), p. 125.Google Scholar

30 Journals, vol. I: X6 B78, n.d., 1850, p. 6.

31 Banner, Michael C., The Justification of Science and the Rationality of Religious Belief (Oxford: Clarendon, 1990), pp. 91, 93.Google Scholar