Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:55:05.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is the Argument from Evil Decisive?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

David Gordon
David Gordon
Affiliation:
Institute for Humane Studies, Menlo Park, California
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Dale Lugenbehl, in ‘Can the Argument from Evil Be Decisive After All?’ provides a powerful defence of the argument from evil against several theistic objections to it. In my opinion, however, he has failed to prove his case. The question of the consistency of the amount of evil existing in the world with the existence of God remains, after Lugenbehl's argument, exactly where it was before – in a state of uncertainty.

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , September 1983 , pp. 407 - 410
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Religious Studies XVIII, 29–35.Google Scholar All subsequent references to this article are by page numbers in the text.