Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:31:04.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

D. Z. Phillips, Wittgenstein and Religion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Brian R. Clack
Brian R. Clack
Affiliation:
Department of Theology and Religious StudiesKing's College LondonStrand London WC2R 2LS
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , March 1995 , pp. 111 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 London: Macmillan, 1992.

2 This assertion reminds one of Evan-Pritchard's description of ‘mystical notions’ as ‘patterns of thought that attribute to phenomena supra-sensible qualities which… they do not possess’. Witchcraft, Oracles and Magic among the Azande (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976), p. 229.Google Scholar

3 Jahoda, Gustav, The Psychology of Superstition (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1970), p. 2.Google Scholar

4 Cf. Frazer, J. G., The Magic Art and the Evolution of Kings, volume two (London: Macmillan, 1911), p. 5.Google Scholar

5 See ‘Wittgenstein on Language and Ritual’, in B. McGuinness (ed.), Wittgenstein and his Times (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1982), pp. 81–82.Google Scholar

6 Conrad, Joseph, The Rover (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992), p. 225.Google Scholar

7 Ibid. p. 232.

8 Hence his desire to consider ‘metaphysics as a kind of magic’.

9 ‘Philosophy (Sections 86–93 of the so-called “Big Typescript”)’, in Philosophical Occasions 1912–1951 (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1993), p. 199.Google Scholar

10 Remarks on Frazer's Golden Bough (Doncaster: Brynmill Press, 1979), p. 10.Google Scholar

11 The Principles of Linguistic Philosophy (London: Macmillan, 1965), p. 81.Google Scholar

12 The Scapegoat (London: Macmillan, 1913)Google Scholar, p. v.

13 ‘Philosophy’, p. 197.

14 To be fair to Phillips, he also sees difficulties in the shouldering of sin by the innocent Christ. See his ‘Scripture, Sin and Speech’ (Archivio di Filosofia, vol. 60, 1992, pp. 281–290).Google Scholar

15 The Blue and Brown Books (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1969), p. 172.Google Scholar

16 Ibid. p. 173.

17 Cf. Philosophical Investigations (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1958), §40.Google Scholar

18 See, for example: Hallpike, C. R., The Foundations of Primitive Thought (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979), pp. 384–423Google Scholar; Skorupski, J. M., Symbol and Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976), pp. 144–148.Google Scholar

19 Remarks on Frazer's Golden Bough, p. 5.

20 Pascal, Fania, ‘Wittgenstein: A Personal Memoir’, in Rhees, R. (ed.), Recollections of Wittgenstein (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984), p. 20.Google Scholar

21 Ludwig Wittgenstein and the Vienna Circle (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1979), p. 68.Google Scholar

22 Unsatisfactory because those who appeal for rain often do seem to expect results: sometimes, if rain does not fall the rain-maker is killed. See Frazer, J. G., The Golden Bough (London: Macmillan, 1922), p. 107.Google Scholar

23 ‘When a man laughs too much in our company (or at least in mine), I half-involuntarily compress my lips, as if I believed I could thereby keep his closed’, ‘Remarks on Frazer's Golden Bough’, in Luckhardt, C. G. (ed.), Wittgenstein: Sources and Perspectives (Hassocks: The Harvester Press, 1979), p. 73.Google Scholar

24 Review of Religion Without Explanation, Mind vol. 88, 1979, p. 155.Google Scholar