Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:45:58.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Troubled Soul of the Academy: American Learning and the Problem of Religious Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2018

D. G. Hart
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The decade of the 1960's was important for American scholars who studied religion. Prospects for employment brightened considerably as public and private universities and Colleges created undergraduate and graduate programs in religious studies. Becoming more self-conscious about their academic identity, professors who staffed these programs founded the American Academy of Religion in 1964, an organization designed to promote scholarship and publication in religion. One index to the growing prominence of religious studies was the survey of humanistic scholarship commissioned by Princeton University's Council on the Humanities and funded by the Ford Foundation. Of the thirteen volumes in this series, two were devoted to the field of religion: Clyde A. Holbrook's Religion, A Humanistic Field (1963), and Religion (1965), a summary of the various fields in religious studies, edited by Paul Ramsey.

Type
Research Article
Information
Religion and American Culture , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , Winter 1992 , pp. 49 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © Center for the Study of Religion and American Culture 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

The Project on the Religious and the Secular in Modern America, headed by George M. Marsden at the Divinity School, Duke University, provided the support for this research. I also thankfully acknowledge the suggestions and criticisms offered by Bradley Longfield, Paul Kemeny, Kathy Long, and Jeff Trexler.

1. Between 1961 and 1970, twenty-seven graduate programs were established, three more than the previous three decades combined (five in the 1930's, eight in the 1940's, and eleven in the 1950's; before 1930 only twenty-one programs existed). Of the ninety-six programs in four-year public institutions that existed in 1970, sixty-one had been founded in the 1960's. Moreover, undergraduate enrollments in religion at private liberal arts Colleges and public institutions increased at a faster rate than the growth of the Student body. Enrollments in graduate programs doubled between 1959 and 1969, a rate of expansion second only to anthropology. These figures come from Welch, Claude, ed., Graduate Education in Religion: A Critical Appraisal (Missoula: University of Montana Press, 1971), 178, 230-35.Google Scholar

2. Knapp, Robert H., The Origins of American Humanistic Scholars (Englewood Cliffe, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1964);Google Scholar Higham, John, ‘The Schism in American Scholarship,” in Writing American History: Essays on Modern Scholarship (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1970), 3–24.Google Scholar

3. Wilson, John F., “Mr. Holbrook and the Humanities,” Journal of Bible and Religion (hereafter JBR) 32 (1964): 253, 260;Google Scholar Schlatter, Richard, “Foreword” to Holbrook, Clyde, Religion, A Humanistic Field (Englewood Cliffe, N.J.: PrenticeHall, 1963), ix.Google Scholar

4. On the history of the study of religion, see Michaelsen, Robert S., The Study of Religion in American Universities (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1965);Google Scholar Wilson, John F., “Introduction: The Background and Present Context of the Study of Religion in Colleges and Universities,” in The Study of Religion in Colleges and Universities, ed. Ramsey, Paul and Wilson, John F. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970), 3–22;Google Scholar Kitagawa, Joseph M., “Humanistic and Theological History of Religions with Special Reference to the North American Scene,” Numen 27 (1980): 198–221;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Preus, J. Samuel, Explaining Religion: Criticism and Theory from Bodin to Freud (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1987);Google Scholar Remus, Harold E., Lusby, E. Stanley, and Tober, Linda M., “Religion as an Academic Discipline,” in Encyclopedia of the American Religious Experience: Studies of Traditions and Movements, 3 vols., ed. lippy, Charles H. and Williams, Peter W. (New York: Charles Scribner and Sons, 1988), 3:1653-69;Google Scholar and Murphy, Murray G., “On the Sdentific Study of Religion in the United States, 1870-1980” in Religion and Twentieth-Century American Intellectual Life, ed. Lacey, Michael J. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), 136-71.Google Scholar

5. By 1975, the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) recognized ethics and comparative religion as part of the humanities. See NEH Program Announcement (Washington, D.C., 1975), 1.

6. ACLS Newsletter 31 (1979), inside cover.

7. On antebellum Colleges, see Guralnick, Stanley M., “Sources of Misconception on the Role of Science in the Nineteenth-Century American College,” Isis 65 (1974): 352-66;CrossRefGoogle Scholar McLachlan, James, “The American College in the Nineteenth Century: Towards a Reappraisal,” Teachers College Record (hereafter TCR) 80 (1978): 287–306;Google Scholar Sloan, Douglas, “Harmony, Chaos, and Consensus: The American College Curriculum,” TCR 73 (1971): 221-51;Google Scholar Findlay, James F., “The SPCTEW and Western Colleges: Religion and Higher Education in Mid-Nineteenth-Century America,” History of Education Quarterly 17 (1977): 31–62;CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Smith, Timothy L., Uncommon Schools: Christian Colleges and Social Idealism in Mid-Western America, 1820-1950 (Indianapolis: Indiana Historical Society, 1978).Google Scholar

8. On the curriculum of colonial Colleges, see Kimball, Bruce A., Orators and Philosophers: A History of the Idea of Liberal Education (New York: Teachers College, 1986), 103-13,133-41.Google Scholar

9. On nineteenth-century moral philosophy, see Meyer, D. H., The Instructed Conscience: The Shaping ofthe American National Ethic (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1972);CrossRefGoogle Scholar Smith, Wilson, Professors and Public Ethics: Studies of Moral Philosophers before the dvil War (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1956);Google Scholar and Howe, Daniel Walker, The Unitarian Conscience: Harvard Moral Philosophy, 1805-1861 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1970).Google Scholar

10. On Princeton, Yale, and Harvard, see Noll, Mark A., “The Founding of Princeton Theological Seminary,” Westminster Theological Journal 42 (1979): 72–110;Google Scholar Bainton, Roland H., Yale and the Ministry (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1957), 79–81;Google Scholar and Wright, Conrad, “The Early Period, (1811-40),” in The Harvard Divinity School: Its Place in Harvard University and in American Culture, ed. Williams, George Huntston (Boston: Beacon Press, 1954), 28–36.Google Scholar

11. On academic specialization during the early nineteenth Century, see Oleson, Alexandra and Brown, Sanborn C., eds., The Pursuit of Knowledge in the Early American Republic: American Scientific and Learned Sodeties from Colonial Times to the Civil War (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976).Google Scholar

12. Miller, Glenn and Lynn, Robert, “Christian Theological Education,” Encyclopedia of the American Religious Experience, 3:1638-44;Google Scholar Saunders, Ernest W., Searching the Scriptures: A History of the Society of Biblical Literature, 1880-1980 (Chico, Calif.: Scholars Press, 1982);Google Scholar Bowden, Henry W., “The First Century: Institutional Development and Ideas about the Profession,” in A Century ofChurch His tory: The Legacy of Philip Schaff, ed. Bowden, Henry W. (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1988), 294–332.Google Scholar Exceptions were the Oriental Seminary at Johns Hopkins University, which provided a home for Old Testament scholarship, and Catholic universities and Colleges, which encouraged biblical and theological scholarship.

13. Schelling, Felix E., Humanities Gone and to Come (Philadelphia: Phi-Beta Kappa Society, 1902), 3–4 Google Scholar, and J. Irving Manatt, “The Future of Greek Studies,” Leader (March 1903): 195, quoted in Veysey, Laurence, “Plural Organized Worlds of the Humanities” in The Organization of Knowledge in Modern America, 1860-1920, ed. Oleson, Alexandra and Voss, John (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979), 55.Google Scholar

14. Fitz-Hugh, Thomas, The Philosophy of the Humanities (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1897);Google Scholar Dewey, John, The Educational Situation (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1902), 82–84;Google Scholar Nielson, William, “The Inaugural Address of the President of Smith College,” School and Society 8 (1918): 63;Google Scholar Calkins, Mary Whiton, The Persistent Problems of Philosophy, rev. ed. (New York: American Museum of Science, 1917);Google Scholar and Hubbard, Frank G., “The Undergraduate Curriculum in English Literature,” Proceedings of the Modern Language Association 23, no. 2 (1908): 258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15. Small, Albion W., The Meaning of Social Science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1910), 275, 277.Google Scholar On the transition from moral philosophy to social sciences, see Dorothy Ross “The Development of the Social Sciences,” in Oleson and Voss, eds., The Organization of Knowledge, 109-21.

16. Leland, ACLS Bulletin (1920): 2.

17. Higham, “Schism,” 17-18. For evidence of the growing self-consciousness of the social sciences, see Ogg, Frederick, Research in the Humanistic and Social Sciences (New York: Century Co., 1928), 3–4, note 2.Google Scholar For developments in philosophy and literature, see Kuklick, Bruce, The Rise of American Philosophy, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1860-1930 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1977), Chaps. 28 and 29;Google Scholar and Vanderbilt, Kermit, American Literature and the Academy: The Roots, Growth, and Maturity of a Profession (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1986), Chaps. 19,20, and 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18. Ogg, Research, 136-38,229-31,252; Leland, Waldo G., “Recent Trends in the Humanities,” Science 79 (1934): 281-82;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Lowell, A. Lawrence, At War with Academic Traditions in America (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1934), 105;CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Ducasse, C. J., “Are the Humanities Worth Their Keep?” American Scholar 6 (1937): 460-70.Google Scholar

19. Hopkins, Howard, History ofthe YMCA in North America (New York: Association Press, 1951);Google Scholar Smith, Seymour A., The American College Chaplaincy (New York: Association Press, 1954);Google Scholar and Cuninggim, Merrimon, The College Seeks Religion (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1947), Chap. 9.Google Scholar

20. Shedd, C. P., The durch Follows Its Students (New Haven: Yale Uni versity Press, 1938), 62–64;Google Scholar Limbert, Paul M., Denominational Policies in the Support and Supervision of Higher Education (New York: Columbia University Press, 1929);Google Scholar and Bass, Dorothy C., “Ministry on the Margin: Protestants and Education,” in Between the Times: The Travail ofthe Protestant Establishment in America, 1900-1960, ed. Hutchison, William R. (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989), 57–61.Google Scholar

21. Bach, Marcus, Of Faith and Learning: The Story ofthe School of Religion at the State University of Iowa (Iowa City: School of Religion, State University of Iowa, 1952), 42–49, 52;Google Scholar and Lampe, M. Willard, The Story of an Idea: The History of the School of Religion of the University oflowa (Iowa City: State University of Iowa, 1958).Google Scholar

22. Robert L. Kelly, “The Place and Function of the Proposed Association,” McDowell, William Frasier, “The Christian Ideal of Education,” and Henry Churchill King, “The Methods of its Attainment,” Assodation of American Colleges Bulletin (hereafter AACB) 1 (1915): 39–43,15-28,28-39.Google Scholar

23. On the efforts of the AAC and liberal education, see Kelly, Robert L., “The Liberal College and Human Values,” AACB 16 (1930): 340-46;Google Scholar Dodds, Harald W., “The Place of Religion in the Curriculum and on the Campus,” AACB 21 (1935): 476-77;Google Scholar Hocking, William Ernest, “Philosophy and Religion in Undergraduate Education,” AACB 23 (1937): 45–54;Google Scholar Nason, John W., “The Nature and Con tent of a Liberal Education,” AACB 27 (1941): 53–61;Google Scholar and Committee on the Re-Statement of the Nature and Aims of Liberal Education to the Commission on Liberal Education of the Association of American Colleges, “The Post-War Responsibilities of Liberal Education,” AACB 29 (1943): 275-99.

24. “Post-War Responsibilities,” 285-86; Greene, Theodore M. and others, Liberal Education Re-Examined, Its Role in a Democracy (New York Harper and Brothers, 1943), 66–69.Google Scholar

25. “Editorial,” JBR 6 (1938): 88.

26. Braden, Samuel R., “The Place of the Bible in a Liberal Education of Today” Christian Education (hereafter CE) 4 (1922-23): 211;Google Scholar Beüer, I. R., “Some Implications of Our Teaching Aims,” CE 14 (1931): 638;Google Scholar Meland, Bernard Eugene, “The Study of Religion in a Liberal Arts College,” JBR 5 (1937): 63;Google Scholar Wild, Laura H., “The Bible and the Foundation of a Course in Religion,” JBR 5 (1937): 168;Google Scholar and Wickey, Gould and Eckhart, Ruth A., “A National Survey of Courses in Bible and Religion in American Universities and Colleges” CE 20 (1936-37): 32–35.Google Scholar Surveys of religion courses indicated a great number of courses offered. However, they also showed that enrollments were small and that the study of religion, which was often conducted in many different departments, had little coherence.

27. Veysey, “Plural Organized Worlds,” 57; Leland, “Recent Trends,” 281; and Higham, “Schism,” 21.

28. “Higher Education for American Democracy,” in Education for Democracy: The Debate over the Report ofthe President Commission on Higher Educa tion, ed. Gail Kennedy (Boston: Heath Press, 1952), 24; Buch, Paul H. and others, General Education in a Free Society: Report of the Harvard Committee (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1945), 47.Google Scholar

29. Van Düsen, Henry P., God in Education: A Tract for the Times (New York: Charles Scribner and Sons, 1951), 47,52;Google Scholar Buttrick, George A., Faith and Educa tion (New York: Abingdon-Cokesbury Press, 1952), 9;Google Scholar Outler, Albert C., “Colleges, Faculties, and Religion,” Educational Record 30 (1949): 45,46.Google Scholar

30. Outler, “Colleges,” 57; Calhoun, Robert L., “The Place of Religion in Higher Education,” in Religion and the Modern World (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1941), 70–71;Google Scholar Shedd, C. P., Proposais for Religion in Postwar Higher Education (Haddam, Conn.: Hazen Foundation, 1946), 10, 19;Google Scholar Nason, John W., “Religion in Higher Education: The Program of Faculty Consultations,” Educational Record 27 (1946): 426.Google Scholar

31. Dodds, John W., “Reaüties in Time of Crisis,” AACB 29 (1943): 359;Google Scholar Greene, Liberal Education, 66; Stanford Conference on the Humanities, Elementary Courses in the Humanities (Palo Alto, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1945), 111; and Millett, Fred B., The Rebirth of Liberal Education (New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1945), 26,45.Google Scholar

32. Figures come from Welch, ed., Graduate Education in Religion, 230-35.

33. The anthologies subsidized by the Hazen Foundation were: College Reading and Religion: A Survey of College Reading Materials Sponsored by The Edward W. Hazen Foundation and the Committee on Religion and Education of the American Council on Education (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1948); Wilder, Arnos N., ed., Liberal Learning and Religion (New York: Harper and Row, 1951);Google Scholar Gauss, Christian, ed., The Teaching of Religion in American Higher Education (New York: Ronald Press, 1951);Google Scholar limbert, Paul M., ed., College Teaching and Christian Values (New York: Association Press, 1951);Google Scholar and Fairchild, Hoxie N., ed., Religious Perspectives in College Teaching (New York: Ronald Press, 1952).Google Scholar

34. For examples of religion programs, see Cuninggim, College Seeks Religion, Chap. 13; and Michaelsen, The Study of Religion. For Protestant perspectives on instruction in other religions, see Mary Thelen, Frances, “The Biblical Instructor and Comparative Religion,” JBR 20 (1952): 71–76;Google Scholar and Wach, Joachim, “General Revelation and the Religions of the World,” JBR 22 (1954): 83–93.Google Scholar

35. Holbrook, Religion, 51, 41. Kiger's, Joseph C. American Learned Societies (Washington, D.C.: Public Affairs Press, 1963)Google Scholar, a history of learned societies, did not mention any of the professional associations in religious studies.

36. Beck, Dwight and others, “Report of the NABI Self-Study Commit tee,” JBR 32 (1964): 200–201;Google Scholar and Holbrook, “Why an Academy of Religion?” JBR 32 (1964): 98-105.

37. Beck and others, “Report,” 200.

38. Holbrook, “Mr. Schlatter's Dilemma Re-Examined,” JBR 32 (1964): 264.

39. Welch, ed., Graduate Education. Welch also composed a report for the Association of American Colleges. See Welch, Claude, ed., Religion in the Undergraduate Curriculum: An Analysis and Interpretation (Washington, D.C.: Association of American Colleges, 1972).Google Scholar

40. Welch, ed., Graduate Education, 24, 25; Robert S. Michaelsen, “The Future of Graduate Studies in Religion,” William A. Clebsch, “Is Mr. Welch Itch ing Where He Ain't Scratching?” and Wilson, John F., “Where Do We Go? Reflections on the ACLS Appraisal of Graduate Education in Religion,” Bulletin of the Council for the Study of Religion (hereafter BCSR) 3, no. 2 (1972): 18,4-7, and 16.Google Scholar

41. Welch, ed., Graduate Education, 94-95. For reactions from the seminary world, see Bechtold, Paul I., McKay, Arthur R., and Hüll, William E., “Some Implications of the ACLS Study for Education in the Theological Seminaries,” Theological Education 8 (1972): 83–120.Google Scholar

42. Ramsey and Wilson, eds., Study of Religion in Colleges and Universities.

43. Robb, J. Wesley, “The Hidden Philosophical Agenda: A Commentary on Humanistic Psychology,” Journal ofthe American Academy of Religion (hereafter JAAR) 37 (1969): 3–14;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Meagher, John C., “Pictures at an Exhibition: Reflections on Exegesis and Theology,” JAAR 47 (1979): 3–20;Google Scholar Long, Charles H., “Cargo Cults as Cultural Historical Phenomenon,” JAAR 42 (1974): 403-14;Google Scholar and May, William F., “Institutions as Symbols of Death,” JAAR 44 (1976): 211-23.Google Scholar For figures on the Publishing trends of the AAR during the 1970's, see Hart, Ray L., “JAAR in the Seventies: Unconcluding Unscientific Postface,” JAAR 47 (1979): 513-16.Google Scholar

44. On the influence of the history of religions, see Kitagawa, “The History of Religions in America,” in The History of Religions: Essays in Methodology, ed. Mircea Eliade and Joseph M. Kitagawa (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1959), 1-30; Wilson, John F., Research Guide to Religious Studies (Washington, D.C.: American Library Association, 1982), 17–19, 101-3;Google Scholar and Alexander, Kathryn O., “Religious Studies in American Higher Education since Schempp: A Bibliographical Essay,” Soundings 71 (1988): 389–412.Google Scholar

45. Wilson, John F., “Developing the Study of Religion in America,” Journal of General Education 20 (1968): 190–208;Google Scholar Lindbeck, George A., University Divinity Schools: A Report on Ecclesiastically Independent Theological Education (New York: Rockefeiler Foundation, 1976);Google Scholar and “Religious Studies/Theological Studies: The St. Louis Project,” JAAR 52 (1984): 727-57.

46. Veysey, “Higher Education as a Profession: Changes and Continuities,” in The Professions in American History, ed. Nathan O. Hatch (Notre Dame, Ind.: Notre Dame University Press, 1988), 15-32. For a Standard account of professionalization, see McGaughey, Robert A., “Transformation of American Academic Life: Harvard University, 1821-1892” Perspectives in American History 8 (1974): 237–332.Google Scholar

47. Ross, “Development of the Social Sciences,” 121.

48. Higham, “Schism;” Wilson, “Mr. Holbrook and the Humanities.”

49. Kitagawa, “Humanistic and Theological History of Religions,” 209212; Legters, Lyman H., “The Place of Religion in Foreign Area Studies,” JAAR 35 (1967): 159-64;Google Scholar Perry, Lewis, Intellectual Life in America: A History (New York: Franklin Watts, 1984), Chap. 8;Google Scholar Ahlstrom, Sidney, “The Radical Turn in Theology and Ethics: Why it Occurred in the 1960%” Annais ofthe American Academy of Political and Social Science 387 (1970): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

50. “American Academy of Religion,” in A Report to the Congress of the United States on “The State of the Humanities” and the Reauthorization of the National Endowment for the Humanities by the American Council of Learned Societies (New York: National Endowment for the Humanities, 1985), 34; Larson, Gerald James, “An Introduction to the Santa Barbara Colloquy: Some Unresolved Questions,” Soundings 71 (1988): 194;Google Scholar Larson, “An Introduction,” 256; Sharpe, Eric J., “Religious Studies, the Humanities and the History of Ideas,” Soundings 71 (1988): 258;Google Scholar and Hammond, Philip E., “The Relationship Between Method and Theory” Soundings 71 (1988): 372.Google Scholar On the variety of modeis within the field, see Remus, Lusby, and Tober, “Religion as an Academic Discipline” Enyclopedia ofthe American Religious Experience, 3:1664-68.