No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 June 2018
This article explores arguments among medico-legal experts (including Amariah Brigham, Isaac Ray, John P. Gray, and W. A. Hammond) about the social and moral ramifications of expanding the definition of insanity to include moral insanity. This is an important corrective to a standard view that sees the movement to transform the insanity defense in nineteenth-century America as a rejection of the explanatory power of human depravity in the face of an optimistic understanding of human nature as found in Scottish common sense philosophy. The debate, especially between Ray and Brigham, on the one hand, and Gray, on the other, finally led to a situation in which religious discussions of sin, the will, grace, and the shape of the human self were legally sidelined.
1. Report of the Trial of Rogers, Abner Jr.,, indicted for the murder of Charles Lincoln, Jr., late warden of the Massachusetts State Prison: Before the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Holden at Boston on Tuesday, January 30, 1844 (Boston: Charles C. Little and James Brown, 1844), 26.Google Scholar
2. This point is made by Paul, Michael Rogin in Subversive Genealogy: The Politics and Art of Herman Melville (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983), 115.Google Scholar
3. Melville, Herman, Moby Dick, or The Whale (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1851), 204.Google Scholar
4. Ibid., 181.
5. Herbert, T. Walker Jr., “Calvinist Earthquake: Moby Dick and Religious Tradition,” in New Essays on Moby-Dick, or The Whale, ed. Brodhead, Richard H. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986), 109.Google Scholar
6. Guelzo, Allen C., “’The Science of Duty’: Moral Philosophy and the Epistemology of Science in Nineteenth-Century America,” in Evangelicals and Science in Historical Perspective, ed. Livingstone, David N., Hart, D. G., and Noll, Mark A. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999), 267–90.Google Scholar
7. Melville, Moby Dick, 181.
8. See chapter 7 of Halttunen's, Karen Murder Most Foul: The Killer and the American Gothic Imagination (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
9. Rothman, David, The Discovery of the Asylum: Social Order and Disorder in the New Republic (New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 2002), 109–29.Google Scholar
10. Prichard defined moral insanity in various ways, including as a “madness consisting in a morbid perversion of the natural feelings, affections, inclinations, habits, moral dispositions, and natural impulses, without any remarkable disorder or defect of the intellect.” Prichard, James Cowles, A Treatise on Insanity and Other Disorders Affecting the Mind (London: Sherwood, Gilbert and Piper, 1835), 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Ibid.
12. Rafter, Nicole, Criminal Brain: Understanding Biological Theories of Crime (New York: New York University Press, 2008), 32.Google Scholar
13. Dain, Norman and Carlson, Eric T., “Moral Insanity in the United States, 1835–1866,” in American Journal of Insanity 118 (March 1962): 795–800.Google Scholar
14. Ibid., 799.
15. Rosenberg, Charles, The Trial of the Assassin Guiteau: Psychiatry and Law in the Gilded Age (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968), 270.Google Scholar
16. Ibid.
17. I have borrowed the term “cross-dimensional concept” from Herbert Figarette, who uses the term to describe insanity in The Meaning of Criminal Insanity (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1972), 37.
18. Kiernan, James, “Moral Insanity—What Is It?” Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 11 (October 1884): 550.Google Scholar
19. Ibid.
20. Arendt, Hannah, Willing (New York: Hartcourt, Brace and Jovanovich, 1978), 63–71.Google Scholar
21. Davis, David Brion, Homicide in American Fiction, 1789–1860: A Study in Social Value (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1957);Google Scholar Halttunen, Murder Most Foul, 5, 136, 186, 249.
22. Blumenthal, Susanna, “The Deviance of the Will: Policing the Bounds of Testamentary Freedom in Nineteenth-Century America,” in Harvard Law Review 119 (February 2006), 959–1034.Google Scholar
23. Karen Halttunen, Murder Most Foul, 5, 136, 186, 249.
24. Howe, Daniel Walker, Making of the American Self: Jonathan Edwards to Abraham Lincoln (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997), 5.Google Scholar
25. Valverde, Marianna, Diseases of the Will: Alcohol and the Dilemma of Freedom: A Study in Social Value (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 190.Google Scholar
26. See, in particular, The Trial of William Freeman for the Murder of John G. Van Nest including the evidence and arguments of counsil with the decision of the supreme court granting a new trial and an account of the death of the prisoner, on of the post-mortem examination of his body (Auburn, N.Y.: Derby Miller and Co., 1848), 435, and Rosenberg, The Trial of the Assassin Guiteau, 149.
27. Ray, Isaac, Treatise on the Medical Jurisprudence of Insanity (1838; repr., Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1962), 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Howe, Making of the American Self, 5
29. Bousma, William J., John Calvin: A Sixteenth–Century Portrait (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988), 139.Google Scholar
30. Ibid., 133.
31. Abzug, Robert H., Cosmos Crumbling: American Reform and the Religious Imagination (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994), 6 Google Scholar.
32. See, for discussion of the place of “disinterested benevolence” in the asylum movement, Brown, Thomas J., Dorothea Dix: New England Reformer (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
33. Abzug, Cosmos Crumbling, 6; see also Noll, Mark, America’s God: From Jonathan Edwards to Abraham Lincoln (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002), 204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34. Bressler, Ann Lee, The Universalist Movement in America, 1770– 1880 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999, 9.Google Scholar
35. Ibid., 19–23.
36. Ibid., 23.
37. Blumenthal, Susanna L., “The Mind of a Moral Agent,” Law History and Review 26 (Spring 2008), 104.Google Scholar
38. Calvin, John, Calvin's Bible Commentaries: Ezekiel, Part II (1565; repr., Charleston, S.C.: Forgotten Books, 2007), 224.Google Scholar
39. Atwater, Lyman H., “Moral Insanity,” Biblical Repertory and Princeton Review 19 (1857): 352.Google Scholar
40. Bushnell, Horace, Moral Uses of Dark Things (New York: C. Scribner's Sons, 1893), 273.Google Scholar
41. Charles Grandison Finney, “Moral Insanity,” in The Oberlin Evangelist, Lecture VII, ed. Katie Stewart (September 10, 1856): 2. In Skeletons of a Course of Theological Lectures, Finney also suggested that all atheists suffer from monomania (Oberlin, Ohio: James Steele, 1840), 36.
42. Rush, Benjamin, Medical Inquiries and Observations, upon the diseases of the mind (Philadelphia: Kimbler and Richardson, 1812),Google Scholar vi, as cited in Blumenthal, “The Mind of a Moral Agent,” 101.
43. Rush, Benjamin, “The Influence of Physical Causes upon the Moral Faculty,” in The Selected Writings of Benjamin Rush, ed. Runes, Dagobert D. (New York: Philosophical Library, 1947), 203 Google Scholar.
44. Ibid., 192.
45. Ibid., 182.
46. Ibid., 192–96.
47. Ibid., 197–201.
48. Ibid.
49. Ibid., 201. The “new measures” were Finney's controversial methods employed in his revival meetings. Finney's argument was different than Rush's insofar as Finney emphasized the newness of the measures and the uniqueness of the social situation. However, they are similar in the way that they presume that one can find the natural analog to the work of the Holy Spirit in specific methods. See Smith, Ted A., The New Measures: A Theological History of Democratic Practice (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
50. Rush, “The Influence of Physical Causes,” 202.
51. Ibid., 192.
52. Ibid., 202.
53. Augstein, Hannah F., “J. C. Prichard's Concept of Moral Insanity: A Medical Theory of the Corruption of Human Nature,” Medical History 40 (1996): 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54. Ibid.
55. Prichard, A Treatise on Insanity, 12.
56. Augstein, “J. C. Prichard's Concept,” 313.
57. Augstein, Hannah F., James Cowles Prichard's Anthropology: Remaking the Science of Man in Early Nineteenth-Century Britain (Amsterdam: Rodolpo, 1999),Google Scholar x.
58. Prichard, A Treatise on Insanity, 236.
59. Augstein, James Cowles Prichard's Anthropology, 25.
60. Ibid., 26.
61. Ibid., 36.
62. Prichard, A Treatise on Insanity, 170.
63. Benjamin Rush, “On Medical Jurisprudence,” in Sixteen Introductory Lectures, as quoted in Blumenthal, “The Mind of the Moral Agent,” 100.
64. Reiss, Benjamin, Theaters of Madness: Insane Asylums and Nineteenth-Century American Culture (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008), 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
65. Luchins, Abraham, “The Cult of Curability and the Doctrine of Perfectability: Social Context of the Nineteenth-Century Asylum Movement,” History of Medicine 3 (June 1993): 203–20.Google Scholar
66. Hughes, John Starrett, In the Law's Darkness: Isaac Ray and the Medical Jurisprudence of Insanity in Nineteenth-Century America (New York: Oceana Publications, 1986), 4.Google Scholar
67. Ray, Treatise on the Medical Jurisprudence of Insanity, 79.
68. Ibid.
69. Ibid.
70. Ibid.
71. Ibid., 25.
72. Ibid., 241.
73. Ibid., 45.
74. Ibid.
75. Ibid., 23.
76. Ibid., 45.
77. Anonymous, “Moral Insanity: An Inquiry into Its Aspects and Effects,” Examiner and Hesperian 2 (January 1840): 1.
78. Ibid.
79. Ibid.
80. Ray, Treatise on the Medical Jurisprudence of Insanity, 274.
81. Ibid., 187.
82. Ibid., 229.
83. A full text version of the ruling can be found at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1843/J16.html.
84. Ray, Treatise on the Medical Jurisprudence of Insanity, 19.
85. For a good treatment, see Arpey, Andrew, The William Freeman Murder Trial: Insanity, Politics, and Race (Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
86. Seward had, in an interesting side note, during his tenure as governor, signed into law a measure intended to expand the definition of insanity. That law, however, had not been tested in the courts at the time of the 1846 trials of Wyatt and Freeman.
87. Tucker, Sheila Saft, The Township of Fleming, Cayuga County, New York: 1823–1973 (Auburn, N.Y.: Brunner the Printer, 1973), 47.Google Scholar
88. Syracuse Religious Recorder 3 (June 18, 1846): 2.
89. Ibid.
90. Ibid.
91. Ibid.
92. Ibid.
93. Cross, Whitney, The Burned-Over District: The Social and Intellectual History of Enthusiastic Religion in Western New York, 1800–1850 (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1950), 44.Google Scholar
94. Winfield, A. B., Antidote to the errors of Universalism, or a scriptural and common sense review of modern universalism together with strictures of restorationism, as contained in Austin's, John Mather review “Universalism another Gospel” (Auburn, N.Y.: Derby, Miller and Co, 1850), viii.Google Scholar
95. Dwyer, Ellen, Homes for the Mad: Life inside Two Nineteenth-Century Asylums (New Brunswick,N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1987), 12.Google Scholar
96. Brigham, Amariah, Observations on the Influence of Religion upon the Health and Physical Welfare of Mankind (Boston: Marsh, Capen and Lyon, 1835), xviii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
97. Brigham, Amariah, “‘Journal of Prison Discipline’ and Lunatic Asylums,” in American Journal of Insanity 2 (1845): 183.Google Scholar
98. Ibid., 181.
99. Hughes, In the Law's Darkness, 21.
100. Ibid., 23.
101. Ibid., 9.
102. Ibid.
103. Gray, John P., “Homicide in Insanity,” American Journal of Insanity 14 (October 1857): 143.Google Scholar
104. Ibid., 145.
105. Ibid., 143.
106. Gray, , “Thoughts on the Causation of Insanity,” American Journal of Insanity 24 (1872): 267.Google Scholar
107. Gray, “Homicide in Insanity,” 146.
108. Ibid.
109. Gray, “Moral Insanity,” American Journal of Insanity 14 (April 1858): 311–23.
110. Ibid.
111. Ibid., 318.
112. Ibid., 320.
113. Ibid., 311.
114. Ibid., 320.
115. Ibid., 321.
116. Edwards, Jonathan, Freedom of the Will: which is supposed to be essential to moral agency, virtue and vice, reward and punishment, praise and blame (London: Hamilton, Adams and Co., 1860), 171 Google Scholar.
117. Hubert, Susan J., Questions of Power: The Politics of Women’s Madness Narratives (London: Associated University Press, 2002), 46.Google Scholar
118. Ray, Isaac, “Dr. Ray on Moral Insanity: An Examination of the Objection to the Doctrine of Moral Insanity,” The American Journal of Insanity 18 (October 1861): 120.Google Scholar
119. Blumenthal, “The Mind of a Moral Agent,” 158.
120. Ibid., 147–48.
121. Elwell, John, A Medico-Legal treatise on malpractice and medical evidence: comprising the elements of medical jurisprudence (New York: J. S. Voorhies, 1860), 360.Google Scholar
122. Tighe, Janet, “Francis Wharton and the Nineteenth-century Insanity Defense: The Origins of a Reform Tradition,” American Journal of Legal History 27 (July 1983): 249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
123. Lears, T. J. Jackson, No Place of Grace: Antimodernism and the Transformation of American Culture, 1880–1920 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1), 40.Google Scholar
124. Rosenberg, The Trial of the Assassin Guiteau, 57.
125. Tighe, Janet, “A Question of Responsibility: Development of American Forensic Psychiatry, 1838–1935” (Ph.D. diss., University of Pennsylvania, 1983), 252.Google Scholar
126. Hammond, William A., Insanity in Its Relations to Crime: A Text and Commentary (New York: D. Appleton and Co., 1873), 41.Google Scholar
127. Ibid., 49.
128. Hamilton, William A., “A Problem for Sociologists,” North American Review 135 (1882): 432.Google Scholar
129. Gray, John P., “Heredity,” American Journal of Insanity 41 (July 1884): 3.Google Scholar
130. Ibid., 6.
131. Ibid., 3.
132. Ibid.
133. Ibid., 12.