Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T06:38:29.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transmission internationale des politiques budgétaires etimparfaite mobilité du capital

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Delphine Béraud
Delphine Béraud*
Affiliation:
EUREQua, Université de Paris I et Cadre, Université de Lille 2
Get access

Résumé

Dans un modèle à deux pays et à horizon infini, dans lequel la mobilité ducapital est imparfaite, on présente une analyse dynamique de la transmissioninternationale des chocs qui affectent les dépenses publiques. Trois typesde financements d’une augmentation des dépenses publiques sont comparés:l’imposition des salaires, l’imposition des revenus du capital à la sourceet l’imposition des revenus du capital selon le principe de taxation à larésidence. L’imposition des salaires ou des revenus du capital à la sourcecrée une réduction du produit dans le pays qui mène cette politique et uneaugmentation du produit à court terme à l’étranger. L’imposition des revenusdu capital de tous les résidents conduit, en introduisant un canalsupplémentaire de transmission internationale, à une baisse de la productionmondiale. Malgré cette baisse, le bien-être progresse dans le pays quiaugmente ses dépenses publiques.

Summary

Summary

In a two-country model where indebted country has a limited access to worldcapital market, a dynamic analysis of the international transmission ofgovernment expenditure is presented. More specifically, we study and comparethe impacts of an increase in government expenditure in the creditorcountry. Alternative methods of finance are presented: a tax on labourincome and a tax on capital income (source based or residence based). Whencapital tax are source based or when income labour is taxed, an increase indomestic government expenditure yields a recession in both the short-run andthe long-run levels of domestic activity. Activity abroad expands in theshort run. When capital tax are residence based, activity declines in thetwo countries. The welfare implications of these policies are alsoexamined.

Keywords

Budgetary policycapital mobilitycapital taxationF43F42F34politique budgétairemobilité du capitalimposition du capitalF43F42F34
Type
Research Article
Information
Recherches Économiques de Louvain/ Louvain Economic Review , Volume 68 , Issue 3 , 2002 , pp. 287 - 311
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 2002 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliographie

Alesina, A. et Perotti, A. (1995), Fiscal expansions and fiscal adjustments in OECD countries, Working Paper 5214, NBER.Google Scholar
Barro, R., Mankiw, G. et Sala-i-Martin, X. (1992), Capital Mobility in Neoclassical Models of Growth, Working Paper 4206 NBER et Working Paper 1019 CEPR (sept. 1994).Google Scholar
Barro, R., Mankiw, G. et Sala-i-Martin, X. (1995), “Capital Mobility in Neoclassical Models of Growth”, American Economic Review, 85(1), pp. 103–15.Google Scholar
Barro, R.J. et Sala-i-Martin, X. (1995), Economic Growth, New York, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Barro, R.J. (1981), “Output Effects of Government Purchases”, Journal of Political Economics, 89(6), pp. 1086–1121.Google Scholar
Baxter, M. et King, R. (1993), “Fiscal Policy in General Equilibrium”, American Economic Review, 83(3), pp. 315–334.Google Scholar
Bénassy-Quéré, A. et Labrèche-Révil, A. (1999), «Monnaie unique, fiscalité unique», La lettre du CEPII, 185.Google Scholar
Bianconi, M. et Turnovsky, S. (1992), “The International Transmission of Tax Policies in a Dynamic World Economy”, Review of International Economics, 1(1), pp. 49–72.Google Scholar
Bianconi, M. et Turnovsky, S. (1997), “International Effects of Goverment Expenditure in Interdependent Economics”, Canadian Journal of Economics, 30 (1), pp. 57–84.Google Scholar
Cohen, D. et Sachs, J. (1986), “Growth and External Debt Under Risk of Debt Repudiation”, European Economic Review, 30, pp. 529–560.Google Scholar
Cooley, T. et Hansen, G. (1992), “Tax Distorsions in a Neoclassical Monetary Economy”, Journal of Economic Theory, 58, pp. 290–316.Google Scholar
Creel, J. (1998), «Contractions budgétaires et contraintes de liquidité: les cas danois et irlandais», Economic Internationale, 75.Google Scholar
Devereux, M.B. et Shi, S. (1991), “Capital Accumulation and the Current Account in a Two-country Model”, Journal of International Economics, 30 (1–2), pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Giavazzi, F. et Pagano, M. (1990), Can severe fiscal contractions be expansionary? Tales of two small european countries, Working Paper, NBER, 3372.Google Scholar
Hugounenq, R., Le Cacheux, J. et Madiès, T. (1999), «Diversité des fiscalités européennes et risques de concurrence fiscale», Revue de l’OFCE, 70, pp. 63–109.Google Scholar
Lipton, D. et Sachs, J. (1983), “Accumulation and Growth in a Two-Country Model: A Simulation Approach”, Journal of International Economics, 15 (1–2), pp. 135–159.Google Scholar
Loury, G. (1981), “Intergenerational transfers and the distribution of earnings”, Econometrica, 49(4), pp. 843–867.Google Scholar
Turnovsky, S. (1997), International Macroeconomic Dynamics, MIT Press.Google Scholar