Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T06:56:41.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Subscription as a price discrimination device

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Jean J. Gabszewicz
Affiliation:
CORE, Université catholique de Louvain
Nathalie Sonnac
Affiliation:
ECARE, Université libre de Bruxelles and LEI/CREST, Paris
Get access

Summary

We propose a model representing a newspaper producer supplying a product which can be acquired by the readers either every day per one unit at a time, or by subscription. The population of potential buyers is differentiated according to the frequency at which they want to read the newspaper. First we identify the optimal pricing policy, namely, the optimal price for issues sold per unit at the newsstand, as well as the optimal subscription fee. Then we show that it is always more profitable to supply the market with both possibilities, – free sale purchase and subscription –, than to concentrate the sales on either of these alternatives.

Résumé

Résumé

Nous étudions le problème de la détermination d’une structure de prix pour un éditeur de journal en monopole, quand il propose aux lecteurs d’acheter celui-ci soit au kiosque, soit par abonnement. La population des lecteurs est différenciée eu égard à la fréquence avec laquelle ceux-ci souhaitent lire le journal. Nous identifions d’abord la politique optimale de prix, prix au kiosque et tarif pour abonnement. Nous montrons ensuite qu’il est toujours plus avantageux pour le monopole de ventiler des ventes en utilisant les deux méthodes – vente au kiosque et vente par abonnement – plutôt que de les concentrer sur une d’entre elles seulement.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 1999 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

We are grateful to V. Ginsburgh, I. Grilo, J. Thisse and two anonyous referees for their comments and suggestions.

References

Adams, W.J. and Yellen, J.L. (1976). Commodity bundling and the burden of monopoly. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90(2), 475498.Google Scholar
Gabszewicz, J.J. (1983). Blue and red cars, or blue cars only? A note on product variety. Economica, 50, 203206.Google Scholar
Glazer, A. and Hassin, Ft. (1982). On the economics of subscriptions. European Economic Review, 19(2), 343356.Google Scholar
McAfee, R.P., McMillan, J. and Whinston, M.D. (1989). Multiproduct monopoly, commodity bundling and correlation of values. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104(2), 371384.Google Scholar
Mussa, M. and Rosen, S. (1978). Monopoly and product quality. Journal of Economic Theory, 18(2), 301318.Google Scholar