Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T23:32:02.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Les choix de portefeuille des ménages en France

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Patrick Artus  and
Eric Bleuze
Patrick Artus
Affiliation:
Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations
Eric Bleuze
Affiliation:
Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations
Get access

Résumé

Après avoir exposé le modèle théorique de choix de portefeuille en avenir incertain, nous essayons de comprendre les choix de portefeuille des ménages en France de 1970 à 1986, en explicitant les divergences par rapport au modèle théorique. Nous retenons une agrégation en trois actifs: liquidités, obligations et actions, en supposant donnée l’épargne financière des ménages. Les principales questions auxquelles l’étude apporte des éléments de réponse sont: (i) Quelle perception ont les ménages de rendements des actions, en particulier des plus-ou moins-values potentielles? (ii) Quelles sont les motivations des ménages dans leur détention de parts OPCVM (organismes de placement collectif en valeurs mobilières: fonds communs de placement)? Ces parts d’OPCVM sont-elles un actif bien distinct des autres en terme de rendement et de risque? (iii) Quels sont les coûts d’ajustement perçus par les ménages? Portent-ils sur la richesse accumulée et/ou l’épargne nouvelle? (iv) Quel est le poids des variables institutionnelles?

Summary

Summary

After having presented the theoretical model for portfolio choices under uncertainty, we analyse those choices in the french case for the period 1970 to 1986. We consider three different assets: money, bonds and stocks, and adress the following issues: (i) How do households form their expectations of the yields on the various assets, specially of capital gains or losser? (ii) Are the shares of mutual funds considered as being really an asset different from the others? (iii) What kind of adjustment costs are households facing? Do they apply to total wealth or just to the flow of current savings? (iv) What is the effect of fiscal or institutional variables?

Keywords

311313311313
Type
Research Article
Information
Recherches Économiques de Louvain/ Louvain Economic Review , Volume 55 , Issue 2 , 1989 , pp. 129 - 153
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 1989 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHIE

Anderson, G. et Blundell, R. (1982), Estimation and hypothesis testing in dynamic singular equation systems, Econometrica, novembre, pp. 1559–1571.Google Scholar
Backus, D., Brainard, W. Smith, G. et Tobin, J. (1980), A model of US financial and non-financial economic behaviour, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, mai, pp. 258–293.Google Scholar
Courakis, A. (1988), Modelling Portfolio Selection, The Economic Journal, septembre, pp. 619–642.Google Scholar
Frankel, J. (1985), Portfolio Crowding-out Empirically Estimated, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Supplement, pp. 1041–1066.Google Scholar
Frankel, J. et Engel, C. (1984), Do Asset Demand Functions optimize over the Mean and Variance of Real Returns? A Six-Currency Test, Journal of International Economics, novembre, pp. 309–324.Google Scholar
Frankel, J. (1982), In Search of the Risk Premium: a six-country model using mean-variance optimization, Journal of International Money and Finance, décembre, pp. 255–274.Google Scholar
Friedman, B. et Roley, V. (1979), Investor’s Portfolio Behavior under Alternative Models of long-term Interests Rate Expectations: Unitary, Rational or Autoregressive, Econometrica, novembre, pp. 32–48.Google Scholar
Friedman, B. (1980), Price Inflation, Portfolio Choice, and Nominal Interest Rates, American Economic Review, mars, pp. 32–48.Google Scholar
Friedman, B. et Roley, V. (1985), Aspects of Investor Behavior under Risk, NBER Working paper, N’1611, avril.Google Scholar
Hartley, P. (1988), Liquidity Sources of Money, International Economic Review, février, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Lantieri, C. et RiviÈRe, P. (1988), Peut-on estimer la demande d’actifs à partir d’un modèle de portefeuille?, à paraître, Revue Economique.Google Scholar
Lewis, K. (1988), Inflation Risk and Asset Market Disturbances: the Mean Variance Model Revisited, Journal of International Money and Finance, Vol. 7, pp. 273–288.Google Scholar
Lucas, R. (1984), Money in a Theory of Finance, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, N°21, Supplement to the Journal of Monetary Economics, pp. 9–46.Google Scholar
Roley, V. (1980), The Role of Commercial Banks, Portfolio Behavior in the Determination of Treasury Security Yields, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, mai, pp. 353–369.Google Scholar
Roley, V. (1981), The Determinants of the Treasury Security Yield Curve, Journal of Finance, décembre, pp. 1103–1126.Google Scholar
Svensson, L. (1985), Money and Asset Prices in a Cash-in-Advance Economy, Journal of Political Economy, octobre, pp. 919–944.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. et Clements, K. (1983), A single portfolio allocation model of financial wealth, European Economic Review, Vol 23, pp. 241–251.Google Scholar
Tobin, J. et Brainard, W. (1968), Pitfalls in Financial Model Building, American Economic Review, mai, pp. 99–122.Google Scholar
Zietz, J. et Weichert, R. (1988), A Dynamic Singular Equation System of Asset Demand, European Economic Review, Vol. 32, pp. 1349–1357.Google Scholar