Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T07:25:46.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Investissement public et effets non linéaires des déficits budgétaires

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Alexandria Minea  and
Patrick Villieu
Alexandria Minea
Affiliation:
LEO, Université d'Orléans
Patrick Villieu*
Affiliation:
LEO, Université d'Orléans
*
**LEO, Faculté de Droit, Rue de Blois, B.P. 6739, 45067 Orléans Cedex 2, France. Email: [email protected].
Get access

Résumé

Dans cet article, nous proposons un modèle théorique simple dans lequel l'impact du déficit budgétaire sur les dépenses publiques d'investissement dépend du niveau de dette publique (en pourcentage du PIB). Lorsque la dette publique est faible, l'impact du déficit est positif, car la charge de la dette peut être absorbée par une diminution des dépenses de consommation. Lorsque la dette est très élevée, en revanche, il n'est plus possible de réduire les dépenses de consommation, et l'ajustement s'opère par les dépenses d'investissement, de sorte que la relation entre déficit et dépenses publiques d'investissement devient négative. Une analyse empirique menée dans un modèle économétrique avec effets de seuil en panel sur 22 pays de l'OCDE vient confirmer cette non linéarité.

Summary

Summary

We propose a simple growth model in which the influence of fiscal deficits on public investment depends upon the ratio between public debt and GDP. When the public debt ratio is small, raising fiscal deficits yields positive effects, since public consumption may negatively adjust to the extra debt burden. However, when the public debt ratio is important, public consumption may no longer exert this role, and raising fiscal deficits reduces public investment. Our analysis using a panel data for OECD countries confirms the existence of non linear effects of fiscal deficits on public investment.

Keywords

déficitdépenses publiques productiveseffets non linéaires de la politique fiscaleH62H63E62deficitpublic investmentnon-linear effects of fiscal policyH62H63E62
Type
Research Article
Information
Recherches Économiques de Louvain/ Louvain Economic Review , Volume 75 , Issue 3 , September 2009 , pp. 281 - 311
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 2009 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

LEO, Faculté de Droit, d'Economie et de Gestion, Rue de Blois, B.P. 6739, 45067 Orleans Cedex 2, France. Email: [email protected].

References

Bibliographie

Alesina, A. et Ardagna, S. (1998). “Tales of Fiscal Contractions”, Economie Policy, vol. 27, p. 487–545.Google Scholar
Alesina, A., Ardagna, S., Perotti, R. et Schiantarelli, F. (2002). “Fiscal Policy, Profits, and Investment”, American Economie Review, vol. 92, p. 571–589.Google Scholar
Alesina, A. et Perotti, R. (1995). “Fiscal Expansions and Adjustments in OECD Countries”, Economie Policy, vol. 21, p. 205–248.Google Scholar
Alesina, A. et Perotti, R. (1997). “Fiscal Adjustments in OECD Countries: Composition and Macroeconomic Effects”, IMF Staff Papers, vol. 44, p. 210–248.Google Scholar
Aschauer, D. (1989). “Is Public Expenditure Productive?”, Journal of Monetary Economies, vol. 23, p. 177–200.Google Scholar
Barro, R. (1990), “Government Spending in a Simple Model of Economie Growth”, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 98, p. S103–S125.Google Scholar
Bertola, G. et Drazen, A. (1993). “Trigger Points and Budget Cuts: Explaining the Effects of Fiscal Austerity”, American Economic Review, vol. 83, p. 11–26.Google Scholar
Blanchard, O. (1990). “Comment”, NBER Macroeconomics Annual, vol. 5, p. 111–116.10.1086/654132Google Scholar
Buiter, W. (2001). “Notes on Ά Code for Fiscal Stability’”, Oxford Economic Papers, vol. 53, p. 1–19.Google Scholar
Colletaz, G. et Hurlin, C. (2006). “Threshold Effects of the Public Capital Productivity: an International Panel Smooth Transition Approach”, Université d’Orléans, LEO wp. No. 1/2006.Google Scholar
Elmendorf, D. et Mankiw, N. (1999). “Government Debt”, in Taylor, J.B. et Woodford, M. (ed), Handbook of Macroeconomics, vol. 1C, Amsterdam: Elsevier, p. 1615–1669.Google Scholar
Feldstein, M. (1982). “Government Deficits and Aggregate Demand”, Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 9, p. 1–20.Google Scholar
European Economy (2003). Public Finance, p. 99–131.Google Scholar
Futagami, K., Morita, Y. et Shibata, A. (1993). “Dynamic Analysis of an Endogenous Growth Model with Public Capital”, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, vol. 95, p. 607–625.Google Scholar
Giavazzi, F. & Pagano, M. (1990). “Can Severe Fiscal Contractions Be Expansionary? Tales of Two Small European Countries”, NBER Macroeconomic Annual, vol. 5, p. 75–111.Google Scholar
Giavazzi, F. & Pagano, M. (1996). “Non-Keynesian Effects of Fiscal Policy Changes: International Evidence and the Swedish Experience”, Swedish Economic Policy Review, vol. 3, p. 67–103.Google Scholar
Giavazzi, F., Japelli, T. et Pagano, M. (2000). “Searching for Non-linear Effects of Fiscal Policy: Evidence from Industrial and Developing Countries”, European Economic Review, vol. 44, p. 1259–1289.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, A., Terâsvirta, T. et van Dijk, D. (2005). “Panel Smooth Transition Regression Models”, WP Series in Economies and Finance No. 604, Stockholm School of Economics.Google Scholar
Hansen, B. (1996). “Inference When a Nuisance Parameter Is Not Identified under the Null Hypothesis”, Econometrica, vol. 64, p. 413–430.Google Scholar
Hansen, B. (1999). “Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference”, Journal of Econometrics, vol. 93, p. 345–368.Google Scholar
Heinemann, F. (2002). “Factor Mobility, Government Debt and the Decline in Public Investment”, Zentrum fiir Europaische Wirtschaftsforschung (ZEW), February.Google Scholar
Keli, M. (2001). “An Assessment of Fiscal Rules in the United Kingdom”, IMF Working Paper No. 01/91.Google Scholar
Kellerman, K. (2007). “Debt financing of public investment: on a popular misinterpretation of the golden rule of public finance”, European Journal of Political Economy, vol. 23, p. 1088–1104.Google Scholar
Minea, A. et Villieu, P. (2008). « Faut-il financer l’investissement public par emprunt ? Les enseignements d’un modèle de croissance endogène », Revue Economique, vol. 59, p. 5–32.Google Scholar
Munnel, A. (1992). “Infrastructure Investment and Economie Growth”, Journal of Economie Perspectives, vol. 6, p. 189–198.Google Scholar
Musgrave, R. (1939). “The Nature of Budgetary Balance and the Case for the Capital Budget”, American Economie Review, vol. 29, p. 260–271.Google Scholar
Oxley, H. et Martin, J. (1991). “Controlling Government Spending and Deficits: Trends in the 1980s and Prospects for the 1990s”, OECD Economic Studies, vol. 17, p. 145–189.Google Scholar
Perotti, R. (1999). “Fiscal Policy when Things Are Going Badly”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 64, p. 1399–1436.Google Scholar
Sutherland, A. (1997). “Fiscal Crises and Aggregate Demand: Can High Public Debt Reverse the Effects of Fiscal Policy?”, Journal of Public Economics, vol. 65, p. 147–162.Google Scholar