Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T02:03:18.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Industrial location theory in German thought – Launhardt and Weber

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Jacky Perreur
Jacky Perreur*
Affiliation:
LATEC –Université de Bourgogne
Get access

Summary

There is an entire branch of industrial location analysis in economics and operational research that refers back to Weber. In this paper I show that the model he developed had already been proposed by W. Launhardt in 1882 as a generalization of a route planning method presented in 1872. It contained all the technical aspects of Weber’s model. That does not mean Weber should be forgotten though, as his contribution involves far more than the simple presentation of the model. In terms of method, he defends and uses the hypothetical-deductive method. As for the content, he attempts to understand the formation of concentrations of economic activities and population, which leads to an interesting analysis of agglomeration economies.

Tout un courant d’analyse des localisations industrielles, présent en économie et en recherche opérationnelle, se réfère à Weber. Dans ce papier nous montrons que le modèle qu’il développe avait déjà été proposé par W. Launhardt dès 1882 comme généralisation d’une méthode de tracé des routes présentée en 1872. On y trouve tous les aspects techniques du modèle de Weber. Ceci ne signifie cependant pas qu’il faille oublier Weber car sa contribution dépasse la simple présentation du modèle. Sur le plan méthodologique il défend et utilise la méthode hypothético déductive. Quant au contenu il souhaite comprendre la formation des concentrations d’activités et humaines ce qui le conduit à une intéressante analyse des économies d’agglomérations.

Keywords

B10R10B10R10
Type
Research Article
Information
Recherches Économiques de Louvain/ Louvain Economic Review , Volume 64 , Issue 1: Space and economics in retrospect , 1998 , pp. 75 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 1998 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blaug, M. [1979], The German hegemony of location theory: A Puzzle in the History of Economic Thought, History of Political Economy, 11(1), pp. 21–29.Google Scholar
Blaug, M. [1985], Economic Theory in Retrospect, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 5th ed. French translation by A. Alcouffe and C. Alcouffe, [1981R], La pensée économique; origine et développement, Paris, Economica.Google Scholar
Bortkiewicz, L. (Von) [1910], Eine geometrische Fundierung der Lehre vom Standort der Industrien, Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, 30, pp. 767–771.Google Scholar
Cooper, L. [1963], Location-allocation problems, Operations Research, 11, pp. 331–343.Google Scholar
Englander, O. [1926], Kritisches und Positives zu einer allgemeinen reinen Lehre vom Standort, Zeitschrift für volkowirtschaft und social, 5, pp. 473–479.Google Scholar
Fels, E.M. [1968], Wilhem Launhardt, in Sills, D.L. (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, New York, MacMillan, pp. 48–49.Google Scholar
Fetter, F.A. [1924], The Economic Law of Market Areas, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 33, pp. 520–529.Google Scholar
Genau De La Marliere, I. [1992], Eléments d'une approche synthétique de la localisation industrielle. Une application à l'industrie des semi-conducteurs, thèse, Université Paris 8, UFR urbanisme et aménagement.Google Scholar
Gide, C. [1926], Cours d'économie politique, Paris, Sirey.Google Scholar
Greenhut, M. [1952], The size and shape of the market Aarea of a firm, Southern Economic Journal, 19(1), pp. 37–50.Google Scholar
Gregory, D. [1981], Alfred Weber and location theory, in Stoddart, D.R. (Ed.), Geography Ideology and Social Concern, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, pp. 165–185.Google Scholar
Hoover, E.M. [1937], Location Theory and the Shoe and Leather Industries, Cambridge Mass., Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Isard, W. [1951], Distance Inputs and the Space Economy, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 65, pp.373–397.Google Scholar
Krzyzanowski, W. [1927], Review of the literature of the location in Industries, Journal of Political Economy, 35, pp.278–291.Google Scholar
Kuhn, H.W. & Kuenne, R. [1962], An efficient algorithm for the numerical solution of the generalized Weber problem in spatial economics, Journal of Regional Science, 4, pp. 21–34.Google Scholar
Kuhn, H.W. [1967], On a pair of dual nonlinear programs, in Abadie, J. (Ed.), Nonlinear Programming, New Holland, P.A. New Holland.Google Scholar
Launhardt, W. [1872], Kommercielle Tracirung der Verkehrswege, Zeitschrift des Hannoverschen Architekten und Ingenieurvereins, pp. 515-534 and 540.Google Scholar
Launhardt, W. [1882], Die Bestimmung des zweckmässigsten Standortes einer gewerblichen Anlage, Zeitschrift des Verlines deutscher Ingenieure, 26(3), pp. 105–116.Google Scholar
Launhardt, W. [1885], Mathematische Begründung der Volkwirtschaftslehere, Leipzig, W. Englemann. English translation edited, with an introduction, by Creedy, J., [1993R], Mathematical Principles of Economics, Aldershot (U.K.), Elgar.Google Scholar
Launhardt, W. [1887-1888], Theory des Tassierens, Hanover, 2 vol. English translation by Bewley, A., [1900R-1902R], The Theory of the trace: Being a Discussion of the Principes of Location; [1900R], Part I: The Commercial Trace [1902R] Part II: The Technical Tracing of Railway, Madras, Lawrence Asylum Press.Google Scholar
L'Harmet, C. [1996], Organisation de l'industrie et espace chez Alfred Weber, communication au 23e colloque de l'A.S.R.D.L.F, Berlin.Google Scholar
Lösch, A. [1940], Die Räumliche Ordnung der Wirtschaft, Iena, G. Fischer. English translation by Wolglom, W.H. & Stolper, W.F., [1954 R], The Economics of Location, London, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Miehle, W. [1958], Link-length minimization in networks, Operations Research, 6, pp. 232–243.Google Scholar
Palander, T. [1935], Beiträge zur Standortstheorie, Uppsala, Almquish et Wick-sells.Google Scholar
Peeters, D. & Perreur, J. [1992], L'approche Weberienne de la localisation industrielle et ses extensions: un bilan, 41e Congrès annuel de l'Association Française de Science Economique, Paris. Revised version, [1996R], l'Espace géographique, n° 3, pp. 273–287.Google Scholar
Perreur, J. [1974], Contribution à la théorie de la localisation industrielle, Thèse, Université de Bourgogne, ronéo.Google Scholar
Perreur, J. [1988], La localisation des unités de production, in Ponsard, Cl. (Ed.) Analyse Economique Spatiale, Paris, PUF, pp. 93–157.Google Scholar
Pinto, J.V. [1977], Launhardt and location theory: Rediscovery of a neglected book, Journal of Regional Science, 17(1), pp. 27–29.Google Scholar
Ponsard, Cl. [1955], Economie et Espace, Paris, S.E.D.E.S. Google Scholar
Ponsard, Cl. [1958], Histoire des Théories Economiques Spatiales, Paris, A. Colin.Google Scholar
Rau, K.H. [1841], Lettres adressées à Quetelet, Bulletin de l'Académie Royale des Sciences et Belles Lettres de Bruxelles, 8, 2e partie, pp. 148–151.Google Scholar
Robine, M. [1985], Karl Heinrich Rau (1792-1870), pionnier de la théorie des aires du marché, in Lacour, Cl. et al., Région et aménagement du territoire, mélanges offerts au Doyen Joseph Lajugie par ses collègues, ses élèves et ses amis, Bordeaux, Ed. Bière, pp. 369—405.Google Scholar
Robine, M. [1992], Frank Albert Fetter's contribution to economic spatial theory: The history of a rediscovery, Sistemi Urbani, 14(1-2-3), pp.77–92.Google Scholar
Schärlig, A. [1973], Où construire l'usine? La localisation optimale d'une activité industrielle dans la pratique, Paris, Dunod.Google Scholar
Schilling, A. [1924], Die Wirtschaftsgeographischen Grundgesetze des Wettbewerbes in mathematischer Form, Technik und Wirtschaft, 7, pp. 145–149.Google Scholar
Schneider, E. [1924], Mathematische Betrachtungen über den nationalen Gütertransport, Technick und Wirtschaft, 9, pp. 204–208.Google Scholar
Schneider, E. [1959], Launhardt, Wilhelm, in Beckerath, E. Von et al., Handwörterbuch der Sozialwissenschaften, vol. 6, Stuttgart, G. Fischer - Tübingen, J.C.B Mohr, pp. 533–534.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. [1954], History of Economic Analysis, New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, A. [1909], Uber den Standort der Industrien, Tübingen. English translation by Friedrich, C.J., [1929R], Theory of the Location of Industries, Chicago, University of Chicago Press; Second edition [1971R], New York, Russel & Russel.Google Scholar
Weber, A. [1914] Industrielle Standortslehre: reine und kapitalistische Théorie des Standorts, Grundriss der Sozialökonomik, VI B, Tübingen, pp. 54–82.Google Scholar
Weiszfeld, E. [1937], Sur le point pour lequel la somme des distances de n points donnés est minimum, The Tokohu Mathematical journal, 43, pp. 335–386.Google Scholar
Wesolowsky, G.O. [1993], The Weber problem: history and perspectives, Location Science, 1(1), pp. 5–23.Google Scholar
Witzgall, C. [1964], Optimal location of a central facility: Mathematical models and concepts, National Bureau of Standards, Report 8388, Gaithersberg, Maryland.Google Scholar