Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:24:45.934Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Equal Endowments as Undominated Diversity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Philippe Van Parijs
Philippe Van Parijs*
Affiliation:
Université Catholique de Louvain-la-Neuve
Get access

Summary

People vary in both tastes and talents. What is the most sensible formulation of the egalitarian ideal once this fact is fully taken into account? The paper examines a number of answers that have been offered to this question, in particular Ronald Dworkin’s counterfactual insurance schemes, and argues against them. It then presents an alternative proposal. The latter generalizes Bruce Ackerman’s notion of undominated genetic diversity, it can be interpreted as a condition of potential envy-freedom, and it is consistent with, though more specific than, Amartya Sen’s capability-based approach.

Résumé

Résumé

Etant donné le fait que les individus ont des goûts et des talents différents, quelle est la formulation la plus raisonnable de l’idéal égalitaire? L’article examine diverses réponses données à cette question, et en particulier la notion de plans d’assurance contre-factuels présentée par Dworkin. Différents arguments critiques à l’égard de celle-ci sont avancés. L’alternative proposée généralise la notion de diversité génétique non-dominée, avancée par Bruce Ackerman, elle est peut-être interprété comme une non-envie potentielle. Il est montré que cette notion, bien que plus spécifique, est compatible avec l’approche de Sen en termes de capacités.

Keywords

024025024025
Type
Research Article
Information
Recherches Économiques de Louvain/ Louvain Economic Review , Volume 56 , Issue 3-4: A Special Issue in Honor of Professor A. Sen : Alternatives to Welfarism , 1990 , pp. 327 - 355
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 1990 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

An earlier version of this paper was presented at a workshop of the European Consortium for Political Research in Paris in April 1989. I am very grateful to its discussant, Brian Barry, and to Vicky Barham, Erik Schokkaert and Bernard Stainier, for useful critical comments. Something close to the present version was presented in April 1990 at the Universities of Wisconsin (Madison) and California (Davis), where it prompted very stimulating reactions from Dan Hausman, Guy Perez, Erik Wright, Richard Arneson, David Copp, Jean Hampton, John Roemer, Robert Sugden and others. Unfortunately, only minor changes could be made in this light. More substantial changes suggested by these discussions will have to await the redrafting of this paper as a chapter of a book in progress on “What (if anything) is wrong with capitalism?”.

References

Ackerman, B. A., (1980), Social Justice in the Liberal State, New Haven & London, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Akerlof, G., (1978), The economics of ‘tagging” as applied to the optimal income tax, welfare programs, and manpower planning”, in: An Economic Theorist’s Book of Tales, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1984, pp. 45–68.Google Scholar
Alexander, L. and Schwarzschild, M., (1987), Liberalism, neutrality, and equality of welfare vs equality of resources, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 15, pp. 85–110.Google Scholar
Arneson, R. J., (1989), Equality and equal opportunity for welfare, Philosophical Studies, 56, pp. 77–93.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A., (1990), Equality of what? On welfare, resources and capabilities, in this issue.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A., (1989), On the currency of egalitarian justice, Ethics, 99, pp. 906–944.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R., (1981a), What is equality? Part I: Equality of welfare, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 10, pp. 185–246.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R., (1981b), What is equality? Part II: Equality of resources, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 10, pp. 283–345.Google Scholar
Pazner, E. A. and Schmeidler, D., (1974), A difficulty in the concept of fairness, Review of Economic Studies, pp. 441–443.Google Scholar
Rawls, J., (1971), A Theory of Justice, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Rawls, J., (1982), Social unity and primary goods, in : Sen, A. and Williams, B. (eds), Utilitarianism and Beyond, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 159–186.Google Scholar
Roemer, J. E., (1982), A General Theory of Exploitation and Class, Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Roemer, J. E., (1985), Equality of talent, Economics and Philosophy, 1, pp. 151–187.Google Scholar
Roemer, J. E., (1986), Equality of resources implies equality of welfare, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101, pp. 751–784.Google Scholar
Sen, A., (1980), Equality of what?, reprinted in: Sen, A., Choice, Welfare and Measurement, Oxford, Blackwell, 1982, pp. 353–369.Google Scholar
Sen, A., (1984), Rights and capabilities, reprinted in : Sen, A., Resources, Values and Development, Oxford, Blackwell, 1984, pp. 307–324.Google Scholar
Sen, A., (1985a), Commodities and Capabilities, Amsterdam, North-Holland.Google Scholar
Sen, A., (1985b), Well-being, agency and freedom, Journal of Philosophy, 82, pp. 169–221.Google Scholar
Sen, A., (1987), On Ethics and Economics, Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sen, A., (1988), Freedom of choice, European Economic Review, 32, pp. 269–94.Google Scholar
Sen, A., (1990), Justice: means versus freedoms, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 19, pp. 111–121.Google Scholar
Steiner, H., (1982), Individual liberty, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 75, pp. 33–50.Google Scholar
Steiner, H., (1989), Three just taxes, paper presented at the Conference, Liberty, Equality, Ecology. Around the ethical foundations of basic income, Louvain-la-Neuve, September, 1989.Google Scholar
Taylor, M., (1982), Community, Anarchy and Liberty, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Parijs, P., (1989), On the ethical foundations of basic income, background paper for the conference Liberty, Equality, Ecology. Around the ethical foundations of basic income, Université Catholique de Louvain, Institut Supérieur de Philosophie, 78 p.Google Scholar
Van Parijs, P., (1990a), The second marriage of justice and efficiency, Journal of Social Policy, 19, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Van Parijs, P., (1990b), Getting paid for doing nothing: plain justice or ignominy? The ethical foundations of basic income, BIRG Bulletin, 11, pp. 15–19. (Original French version: Peut-on justifier une allocation universelle? Une relecture de quelques théories de la justice économique, Futuribles, 144, pp. 29–42.)Google Scholar
Varian, H., (1974), Equity, envy, and efficiency, Journal of Economic Theory, 9, pp. 63–91.Google Scholar
Varian, H., (1985), Dworkin on equality of resources, Economics and Philosophy, 1, pp. 110–125.Google Scholar